In no way do anyone ever , using their senses, perceive any of the globes claims.

The globe is nonsense.

The Globe Concept Tries To Make Sense Out Of NONSENSE

Ideas have consequences.

The globe belief leads to nihilism.

The Globe Belief Has Consequences

How To Cope That Earth Is Flat Ask, Ignore, Repeat

Globe Earther can’t deal with evidence so he goes into an
NPC like infinite loop.

Asks a question.
Ignores the answer.
Repeat.

Russian Girl gets introduced to the nature of our flat earth.

Current Satellite access salesman , former UN Youth liaison for Outer Space , former NASA employee has a laid back dialogue with Flat Earthers 

Koolaid Drinking And Space Pill Popping IRL Space Evangelist Vs Flat Earth

Just an Average dude gets the full exposition on what flat earthers experience and their critical thinking approach.

Average Glober Peaks Behind The Flat Earth Curtain

Test The Earth Yourself Or Be An NPC
Conversation on the 24/7 Flat Earth Discord with an NPC

FLAT EARTH
It’s your responsibility to know what’s true not the experts.

Don’t out-source your brain.

Tyranny of Experts

Discussion With Another Physics PHD

The conversation begins with a foundational question about the nature of pressure, comparing how it functions in liquids versus gases. This quickly evolves into a core debate between a speaker with a Ph.D. in physics and a group of skeptics on a Flat Earth Discord server. The central point of contention is whether a column of gas creates pressure due to its own weight in the same way a column of water does.

The skeptics argue that the kinetic theory of gases and the lack of a defined “surface” mean that gravity does not hold gas down, and therefore gas pressure cannot exist outside of a sealed container. The physicist counters by explaining the principles of atmospheric pressure, intermolecular forces, and thermodynamics, arguing that the weight of the air above is precisely what creates pressure at lower altitudes. The discussion delves into the philosophy of science, the validity of scientific models, and the burden of proof. The skeptics cite specific amateur experiments, such as laser tests over long distances of water, which they claim empirically disprove the Earth’s curvature. The conversation concludes with a sociological debate about why such “evidence” is not accepted by mainstream science, with the physicist suggesting a global conspiracy is less likely than errors in the experiments themselves.

Justification For A Flat Earth

Summary of the Discussion

A person new to the concept of a flat Earth asks a proponent (DJ) to explain the difference between the flat Earth and globe Earth models and to provide evidence.

The Flat Earther argues that their primary evidence is direct, everyday experience: the ground feels stationary, water surfaces appear perfectly flat, and the horizon looks flat. He contrasts this with the globe model, which he describes as a “belief system” taught from a young age that contradicts our senses. He claims Globe Earthers experience a flat, motionless world but believe it’s a rapidly spinning, curving sphere.

The newcomer counters by suggesting that the Earth is simply too large for its curvature to be perceptible to a small human. The Flat Earther agrees this is the standard explanation but claims that when objective measurements are taken, no curvature is found. He uses the example of a 10-mile lake, explaining that according to globe mathematics, there should be 66 feet of curvature, which would hide the opposite shore. However, he asserts that in reality, one can see straight across, which he presents as proof that the Earth is flat. The conversation concludes with the newcomer asking about the group’s belief in NASA.