
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Within Christian circles on the faith and sexuality, we (especially Side B people) spend a lot of time talking about different “sides” and where we stand. Some people think we shouldn’t even talk about sides at all. While there may be merit to some of their objections, we still think it’s a valuable way of framing things. This episode explains why we keep using “Side A” and “Side B”. We might give you some new ideas, might change your mind… or it might just give you more things to argue about with us. We welcome all of those!
Note: This episode uses the terms “Side A” and “Side B” (and X, and Y) as shorthand quite a bit. If you’re new to the conversation (welcome!), you can totally join us for an insider conversation…but first you might find it helpful to check out Communion & Shalom episode #3, where we talk through the four “sides”: #3 - A-B-Y-X | 4 Sides on SSA/Gay Sexuality
__________
Timestamps
(00:57) Why did this topic come up?
(04:40) What are the strengths of using "sides" language or framework?
(09:33) Critiques of using "sides" language or frameworks
(25:03) Critiques we find wisdom in
(27:08) Alternatives: What other language besides "sides" could we use?
(35:59) Is "sides" language sufficient for our moment?
__________
Links and References
Below are some names mentioned in this episode, which may help make this conversation easier to follow and look up.
__________
If you like this podcast, please consider…
→ Sharing feedback or questions! www.podpage.com/communion-shalom/contact
→ Supporting us on Patreon! patreon.com/communionandshalom
→ Following us on Instagram! @communionandshalom
—
Credits
Creators and Hosts: David Frank, TJ Espinoza
Audio Engineer: Carl Swenson (www.carlswensonmusic.com)
Podcast Manager: Elena
5
1111 ratings
Within Christian circles on the faith and sexuality, we (especially Side B people) spend a lot of time talking about different “sides” and where we stand. Some people think we shouldn’t even talk about sides at all. While there may be merit to some of their objections, we still think it’s a valuable way of framing things. This episode explains why we keep using “Side A” and “Side B”. We might give you some new ideas, might change your mind… or it might just give you more things to argue about with us. We welcome all of those!
Note: This episode uses the terms “Side A” and “Side B” (and X, and Y) as shorthand quite a bit. If you’re new to the conversation (welcome!), you can totally join us for an insider conversation…but first you might find it helpful to check out Communion & Shalom episode #3, where we talk through the four “sides”: #3 - A-B-Y-X | 4 Sides on SSA/Gay Sexuality
__________
Timestamps
(00:57) Why did this topic come up?
(04:40) What are the strengths of using "sides" language or framework?
(09:33) Critiques of using "sides" language or frameworks
(25:03) Critiques we find wisdom in
(27:08) Alternatives: What other language besides "sides" could we use?
(35:59) Is "sides" language sufficient for our moment?
__________
Links and References
Below are some names mentioned in this episode, which may help make this conversation easier to follow and look up.
__________
If you like this podcast, please consider…
→ Sharing feedback or questions! www.podpage.com/communion-shalom/contact
→ Supporting us on Patreon! patreon.com/communionandshalom
→ Following us on Instagram! @communionandshalom
—
Credits
Creators and Hosts: David Frank, TJ Espinoza
Audio Engineer: Carl Swenson (www.carlswensonmusic.com)
Podcast Manager: Elena
4,303 Listeners
614 Listeners
1,624 Listeners
1,184 Listeners
90 Listeners
23 Listeners
817 Listeners
524 Listeners