In this episode, Niall discusses whether Elon Musk's comments about an inevitable civil war are incitement or simply his opinion. Both the Irish Taoiseach and the UK Prime Minister are demanding a crackdown on online commentary around immigration and riots, condemning Musk's remarks.

No 10 has criticized Musk for his post under a video of violent riots in Liverpool, stating that "civil war is inevitable." Keir Starmer’s spokesperson condemned the comment, emphasizing that the violence came from a minority and did not represent Britain. The government is pushing social media platforms to remove criminal content swiftly and is considering legal actions against those inciting violence online.

Musk was responding to a video posted by far-right activist Tommy Robinson, criticizing Starmer's statement on protecting Muslim communities. Musk's interactions with inflammatory content have sparked further controversy.

Some callers believe Musk's comments can be seen as incitement, arguing that influential figures making inflammatory statements can fuel anger and violence, exacerbating an already tense situation. They emphasize the responsibility of public figures to avoid reckless remarks.

Other callers feel Musk's comments are just his opinion and should be protected as free speech. They argue that people are responsible for their own actions and that blaming someone's opinion for inciting violence shifts responsibility away from those actually committing violent acts.

Niall wraps up the discussion by highlighting the importance of responsible speech and the fine line between expressing opinions and inciting violence. He emphasizes the need for public figures to be mindful of their influence and the potential consequences of their words.