On today’s show, Niall hears from a heartbroken wife struggling with a heartbreaking dilemma. After years of trying for a baby, her husband was diagnosed as infertile. She wants to pursue sperm donation and experience pregnancy, but he insists on adoption — saying he couldn’t love a child that wasn’t biologically his.

Callers join the conversation to share their own experiences, opinions, and advice. Should she follow her dream of pregnancy or respect her husband’s wishes to adopt? Can their marriage survive this divide, or is this a choice that could break them apart?

A powerful and emotional discussion on love, parenthood, and what really makes a family.

In this episode, host Niall sits down with outspoken restaurateur and media personality Paul Treyvaud to take a hard look at the state of Irish tourism. Paul pulls no punches as he shares his views on why Ireland's tourism industry is struggling, pointing the finger at government policies, rising costs, and what he sees as a lack of vision for the future. Expect frank opinions, insider perspectives from the hospitality frontline, and a passionate call for change. Whether you agree with Paul or not, this is a conversation you won’t want to miss.

Today on the show, we read a heart-wrenching email from a woman whose world has been turned upside down. After 10 years of what she thought was a happy marriage, her husband returned from a golf trip and confessed to a drunken one-night stand with a hotel employee. Now she's torn between her love for him, his tearful remorse, and her own heartbreak.

Listeners weighed in — and wow, did opinions differ. Some callers said forgiveness is possible when someone is truly sorry, especially for the sake of their family. Others insisted that betrayal is betrayal, and once that trust is broken, there's no going back.

Would you forgive a cheating partner who confessed out of guilt? Or is that a line that can’t be uncrossed?

Tune in for an emotional, raw, and thought-provoking discussion on love, trust, and second chances.

In this episode, we tackle a question that affects almost every homeowner in Ireland: Is property tax giving us value for money?

Dublin City Councillors are preparing to scrap a long-standing 15% discount on Local Property Tax for 2026—the first time this has happened in over a decade. Combined with government-led revaluations reflecting Ireland's soaring house prices, some homeowners could see their annual bills rise by hundreds of euros.

For example, owners of a €450,000 home will now pay around €428 a year, while those with properties worth €1.2 million face an annual charge of €1,094. Yet, by European standards, Labour's Darragh Moriarty argues that Ireland’s property taxes are still relatively modest—and crucially, they help fund local services like waste collection, libraries, street maintenance, and parks.

But is this extra cost justified? That’s what we asked our listeners—and the responses were mixed:

🔊 One caller praised property tax as a fair way to fund essential local services, saying they'd rather pay a little extra than see services cut or rely on income taxes alone.

🔊 Another listener was far less convinced, saying their bins are still overflowing, potholes go unrepaired, and they see little evidence that their tax money is improving their neighbourhood.

🔊 A third viewpoint raised a broader question: Should we even tax homes at all, given that many people are already stretched by mortgages, energy bills, and other rising living costs?

So what do you think—are we paying a fair share to maintain our communities, or is property tax another financial burden without enough return?

In this episode, Niall asks: Should couples who live together have the same legal rights as married couples?

More couples than ever are choosing to live together without getting married. But when it comes to things like inheritance, pensions and property rights, cohabiting partners often have far fewer protections under the law. Should that change, or does marriage deserve to stay different?

Some callers argued that marriage is about serious commitment — legally and financially. They felt if you want the rights and security that come with marriage, you should be willing to make that commitment. For them, it is about protecting what marriage means.

Others said times have changed. They pointed out that many couples build full lives together, raise children and buy homes but still have no legal safety net if things go wrong. They argued that love and loyalty matter more than paperwork, and the law should reflect that.

A few callers said living together is often stronger than some marriages, and that modern families should not be penalised for avoiding a ceremony.

As Niall points out, this is not just about weddings and rings. It is about how the law treats families, fairness in modern relationships, and whether tradition should still decide who is protected.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Ireland limit how many terms a politician can serve?

Twelve states in the United States are calling for limits on how long members of Congress can stay in office. Some believe Ireland should do the same to stop politics becoming a lifelong career for the same faces decade after decade. Would term limits shake up Irish politics or just swap out one set of problems for another?

Some callers said term limits are badly needed. They argued that too many politicians get comfortable, lose touch, and do little to earn their place once elected. They felt limits would clear out the old guard and bring in new people with fresh ideas and real-life experience.

Others disagreed, saying it is up to voters to decide who stays or goes. They argued that if someone does a good job and people want them back, that is democracy in action. Some pointed out that experience matters and that not all long-serving politicians are out of touch.

A few callers felt term limits would change little if deeper issues in the system were not fixed. They said Ireland needs more accountability and genuine change, not just new faces following the same old party line.

As Niall points out, this debate is about more than years in office. It is about trust in politics, the quality of leadership, and whether new rules would really bring new ideas.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should you put a dog down for biting?

A distressed listener wrote in about a painful family dilemma. Her five-year-old dog bit their three-year-old son on the leg badly enough to need stitches. Her husband now insists the dog must be put to sleep to protect their child. She believes it was a one-off incident that could be managed with training or rehoming. Who is right?

Some callers sided with the husband, saying once a dog bites a child so seriously, you can never fully trust it again. They argued the safety of a child must always come first, even if it means making a heartbreaking decision.

Others said putting the dog down is too extreme. They pointed out that dogs often bite when provoked or scared and that proper training or rehoming could prevent it from happening again. Some argued families have to take responsibility too, and killing the dog is not the only answer.

As Niall points out, this is not just about a dog. It is about balancing love for a family pet with the responsibility to protect a child, and deciding whether one bite should mean the end.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should there be limits on free speech?

The EU is pressuring the Irish Government to bring in stricter hate speech laws that would make it illegal to say or share certain things that are seen as inciting hatred or violence. Some say this is badly needed to protect vulnerable groups. Others believe it is a dangerous step towards censorship and losing the right to speak freely.

Some callers supported tighter rules, saying free speech should not mean giving people a free pass to spread hate, threats, or messages that fuel real-world violence. They argued that with so much online abuse and polarisation, clear limits help keep communities safe.

Others argued the opposite. They said once you start restricting speech, it becomes easy for governments to control what people can say about anything, including politics. They warned that fear of saying the wrong thing could silence ordinary people and damage honest debate.

As Niall points out, this debate is about finding a balance — how to protect people from harm without losing the freedom to speak your mind.

In this episode, Niall asks: Would you stand by a loved one if they committed a serious crime?

It is one of the hardest questions any family could face. If your son, daughter or close relative was found guilty of something terrible like rape or murder, would you stand by them or cut all ties? Some say family loyalty comes first no matter what. Others believe there are crimes so serious that the bond is broken forever.

Some callers said they could never turn their back on their child, no matter the crime. They argued you can hate the act but still love the person who did it, because family means standing beside them in the darkest times, not just when things are good.

Others could not accept that idea. They said some crimes cross a line that cannot be forgiven, and that standing by a guilty loved one only adds to the pain of the victim and their family. For them, loyalty has limits.

As Niall points out, this is not a question most people ever want to face — but it reveals where we draw the line between unconditional love and what we cannot excuse.

In this episode, Niall asks: Should Ireland scrap student loans for graduates who stay and work here for ten years?

The government recently confirmed there will be no cut to college fees, leaving many students and families struggling with the high cost of third-level education. One idea suggested before is to let students borrow the full amount for fees — but if they stay and work in Ireland for a decade, the loan is wiped.

Some callers supported the idea, saying it would keep skilled graduates like nurses, engineers, and teachers in the country. They argued it rewards young people who commit to giving back and helps families who can barely cover rising fees.

Others disagreed, saying the plan is unfair on taxpayers who would foot the bill. They felt a free degree for staying puts students ahead of other workers who also pay their way but get no such benefit. Some said the real problem is not fees, but the high cost of living that drives people abroad anyway.

As Niall points out, this is not just about student debt — it is about how to keep Irish talent at home and whether the State should give graduates a reason to stay.