The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

The horrific crash on the M9 has shocked the country and left two very different sets of families facing unimaginable consequences.

Five teenage boys died after the BMW they were travelling in was driven the wrong way along the M9 near Moone in Co Kildare and collided head on with a Hyundai carrying three women and a seven year old boy. Gardaí are continuing to investigate all of the circumstances surrounding the incident.

The innocent occupants of the Hyundai were sisters Alma Kinsella and Niamh Kinsella, both in their 30s, their younger sister Ella Hendricken, who is in her 20s, and Alma’s seven year old son. The family, from the Carlow area, had been travelling to Dublin Airport to attend a family wedding in England. Alma and Niamh were reported to be in critical condition, while Ella and the young boy were being treated for serious injuries.

In this episode, Niall opens the phone lines to listeners to discuss a difficult question that has emerged in the aftermath of the tragedy.

While there has understandably been enormous sympathy for the innocent family whose lives have been changed, there has also been anger at the reckless behaviour that led to the crash. Some people have gone further, arguing that the parents of young people involved in serious criminal behaviour should accept some responsibility, or even feel ashamed of what their children have done.

But is that fair?

The discussion takes an emotional turn after a listener contacts the programme with her own story.

Twenty years ago, her teenage son died after crashing a stolen car into another vehicle carrying a husband and wife. She says she has lived ever since with enormous sympathy and guilt over what happened to the innocent couple, but strongly rejects the suggestion that she was a bad parent.

She describes her son as a loving child who developed a passion for cars and mechanics, but says everything began to change in his early teenage years when he lost interest in school and started mixing with the wrong crowd. Gardaí began arriving at the family home, he got into trouble with the law and, despite repeated attempts by his mother and older siblings to steer him away from that lifestyle, his behaviour continued.

Her other two children never got into trouble, went on to build successful lives and careers, and she asks a question many parents will understand: if three children are raised in the same home by the same parents, but only one chooses a destructive path, can the parents really be blamed?

Niall asks callers where parental responsibility begins and where it ends.

Can loving and responsible parents raise a child who eventually becomes involved in theft, violence, joyriding or other serious criminal behaviour?

Should parents be held morally responsible when their teenage children repeatedly break the law?

Or does there come a point where a young person has to take responsibility for their own choices, regardless of how they were raised?

And perhaps the most difficult question of all: if your child caused terrible suffering to innocent people, could you still grieve for them, defend the way you raised them and love them despite what they had done?

New figures suggest Ireland’s relationship with the Catholic Church is continuing to change dramatically, with the annual number of Catholic baptisms across the island falling by around 30% over the past decade.

In this episode, Niall speaks to Dr Tom Finegan, Chairman of The Iona Institute, whose organisation compiled the new figures, and Michael Nugent of Atheist Ireland, to debate what is driving the decline and what it could mean for Irish society.

The Iona Institute says the fall is not simply about people abandoning religion. Births across the island have fallen by almost 19% over the same period, with the organisation estimating that declining birth rates account for roughly 60% of the reduction in baptisms, while increasing secularisation accounts for the remainder.

But the Census figures also show a significant generational shift. In 2016, 78.3% of children aged 0 to 4 were recorded as Catholic, compared with 65.4% in 2022. Over the same period, the proportion recorded as having no religion rose from 9.2% to 15.6%.

There are also striking regional differences. Baptisms have fallen by almost 40% in Dublin, more than 40% in the Diocese of Meath, and almost 38% in Down & Connor, while some more rural dioceses have experienced much smaller declines.

Tom Finegan argues that despite declining Mass attendance and increasing secularisation, “cultural Catholicism” remains a significant force in Ireland, with large numbers of parents still identifying as Catholic and choosing baptism for their children.

Michael Nugent offers a very different perspective, examining whether the decline represents Ireland becoming a genuinely more secular society, whether religion should continue to have such an influence over schools and public institutions, and whether traditional religious identity is gradually being replaced by a society where people increasingly define their morality and values without reference to a Church.

Niall asks whether Ireland is simply witnessing the natural decline of an institution that once held enormous power, or whether something important could be lost with it.

Does society need religion to provide community, morality and a sense of belonging? Can those things exist just as strongly without God? And when cultural Catholicism eventually fades, if it does, what takes its place?

A lively debate about faith, atheism, falling birth rates and the changing face of modern Ireland.

In this episode, Niall Boylan speaks to Daily Mail journalist Ken Murray about a controversial proposal from Reform UK that would force some long term welfare claimants to carry out 20 hours of community work every week in order to continue receiving their benefits.

Under Reform UK’s proposed Welfare to Work scheme, people who have been unemployed for more than a year and are considered fit to work could be required to carry out unpaid community work or face sanctions on their benefits. Suggested jobs include cleaning high streets, maintaining parks, working in libraries, carrying out council house repairs and helping charities, with claimants receiving £30 a week towards expenses. Reform argues that more than 330,000 Universal Credit claimants who are capable of working have been unemployed for over a year.

Could something similar work in Ireland?

The latest CSO unemployment figures estimate that 149,900 people were unemployed in July 2026, giving Ireland an unemployment rate of 5.1%. Youth unemployment was considerably higher at 12.3%.

Separate Live Register figures give an indication of the number of people claiming Jobseeker related payments. In June 2026, the seasonally adjusted Live Register stood at 172,600, while 54,477 people had been continuously registered for a year or longer. The number of Jobseeker’s Allowance claims was also up 3.4% compared with the previous year.

So should people who have been unemployed for a prolonged period and are capable of working be expected to give something back to the community in return for their welfare payment?

Supporters might argue that if taxpayers are supporting somebody financially, asking that person to spend part of their week cleaning streets, maintaining parks, helping community organisations or carrying out other useful work is hardly unreasonable. It could provide routine, experience and a pathway back into employment.

Critics will see it very differently. Ireland has been here before with schemes such as JobBridge, which became heavily criticised over concerns about the quality of some placements and whether employers were benefiting from subsidised labour rather than creating properly paid jobs. Youth organisations reviewing JobBridge called for significant reform and questioned whether it always provided genuine progression into secure employment.

And that raises the central question: is asking someone to work 20 hours for their welfare payment a reasonable contribution to society, or is it effectively creating a pool of cheap or unpaid labour?

Would councils stop employing cleaners, maintenance workers and other properly paid staff if welfare recipients could carry out the work instead? Would it create a race to the bottom in wages? Or have we reached the point where someone who is capable of working but remains on welfare for years should be expected to contribute something in return?

Niall and Ken debate whether Ireland should consider its own version of Reform UK’s proposal and ask listeners the simple but highly divisive question: Should unemployed people be forced to work for their dole?

In this episode, Niall Boylan speaks to journalist Laura Perrins about whether Ireland needs to fundamentally rethink who we send to prison and what prison is actually supposed to achieve.

Ireland’s prisons are under enormous pressure. On 13 August 2026, 5,619 people were in custody across the State, with 339 prisoners sleeping on mattresses on the floor. Limerick Women’s Prison was operating at approximately 161% of capacity. The overcrowding crisis has renewed calls from penal reform advocates for greater use of community service, probation and other alternatives to short custodial sentences, particularly for offenders who do not pose a serious threat to the public.

The controversy intensified following the extraordinarily early release of Alison Chawke, who served just 28 days after being sentenced to two years and two months, with the final 14 months suspended, for her role in an assault on two men at a Limerick hotel. Chawke was released under the Community Return Scheme, which allows eligible prisoners to leave custody under supervision and complete unpaid community work. Her case has become part of the wider debate about overcrowding and whether prisoners are now being released far earlier than the public might reasonably expect.

But it also raises a much bigger question. Should prison always be the answer?

Some penal reform experts argue that prison should increasingly be reserved for people who pose a genuine danger to society, rather than automatically imprisoning people convicted of non violent or relatively minor offences. In 2024, 67% of Ireland’s prison population were serving sentences of less than one year, and reform advocates argue that many of those sentences could potentially be replaced by community service or other sanctions.

Niall and Laura ask whether someone convicted of fraud, failing to pay a fine or another financial offence necessarily needs to occupy a prison cell. Could offenders instead face substantial community service, financial penalties, restrictions on their liberty or compulsory work programmes?

And where should we draw the line? If prison is increasingly regarded as a last resort, does that create a fairer and more effective justice system, or does it risk removing the punishment and deterrence that victims and the wider public expect when somebody commits a crime?

Niall Boylan is joined by John Dallon, one of the leaders of the Dublin fuel protests earlier this year, and election candidate Eddie Punch, as motorists face another painful rise in petrol and diesel prices.

From September 1, the first stage of the Government’s planned restoration of fuel taxes is due to add around 9c a litre to petrol and 10c to diesel, with the NORA levy also returning. At the same time, pump prices are already rising because of renewed volatility in global oil markets linked to the continuing conflict with Iran. Average diesel prices have climbed to about €1.92 a litre, with petrol around €1.84, meaning the September tax increase could push diesel through the €2 mark. Further tax increases had been planned for October, November and December, although the Government is now under growing pressure to postpone them.

John Dallon says protesters are prepared to take action again if motorists and hauliers are pushed beyond breaking point. But after the disruption caused by previous demonstrations, critics argue that blocking roads, fuel depots and city centres damages businesses and punishes ordinary people trying to get to work.

Niall asks: Are fuel protesters justified in bringing the country to a standstill to force the Government to act, or do disruptive protests ultimately hurt the very people they claim to represent?

Niall Boylan is joined by columnist and journalist Brenda Power to discuss the horrific M9 crash that has left five teenagers dead and four innocent members of one family seriously injured, including a seven year old boy.

The latest information suggests the five teenagers were travelling in a stolen BMW and had allegedly been involved in attempted burglaries and car break ins in the Athy area earlier that night. Gardaí had tried to stop the car at around 2am, but it sped away. Investigators believe the BMW then travelled the wrong way along the M9 on two separate occasions before eventually crashing head on into a Hyundai carrying three sisters and the young son of one of the women. Two of the women remain in a critical condition, while the third woman and child are seriously injured. Gardaí were not pursuing the BMW at the moment of impact.

The tragedy comes just eight days after another stolen car carrying nine teenagers travelled the wrong way on the M50 and crashed into an innocent motorist. Garda Commissioner Justin Kelly has warned that some drivers are deliberately engaging in this behaviour for social media attention, describing it as reckless and devastating.

The Garda Representative Association is now calling for proper pursuit training, saying Gardaí are effectively “damned if they do and damned if they don’t”. The GRA says no Garda currently receives specific pursuit training and that deliberately driving against motorway traffic to evade Gardaí amounts to playing Russian roulette with people’s lives.

Niall asks Brenda whether the law now needs to change. Should specially trained Gardaí be given greater legal protection and additional powers to forcibly stop a vehicle being deliberately driven the wrong way down a motorway?

Or would allowing Gardaí to ram or force such vehicles off the road create an even greater risk to innocent motorists?

And after two terrifying incidents in little more than a week, have we reached the point where doing nothing is potentially more dangerous than allowing Gardaí to intervene?

This week on Not Suitable For Broadcast, Niall Boylan is joined once again by his former producer AJ Walsh for a fast, funny and unapologetically opinionated look back at some of the biggest talking points of the week.

They ask whether the Government is genuinely expanding choice for women and families, or increasingly looking down on traditional marriage, motherhood and stay at home parenting. They also get into Ireland’s cash economy and ask the awkward question: if you knew your neighbour was taking cash in hand and not declaring it, would you report them?

Family loyalty comes under the microscope too. If a brother committed a violent assault or your child was caught dealing drugs, how far would you go to protect them before loyalty becomes enabling?

Niall and AJ also look at the cost of holidaying in Ireland and ask whether hotels, restaurants, attractions and car hire have simply become too expensive for tourists. Then things get even more heated as they debate whether householders should have stronger legal protection when confronting burglars inside their own homes, and whether offensive speech should ever become a criminal matter under hate speech laws.

There is some light relief when the clampers themselves get clamped in Dublin, before the lads turn their attention to an extraordinary 24 hours in the skies, with the eclipse grabbing all the headlines while six planets and the Perseid meteor shower were putting on their own show.

Politics, family, crime, free speech, tourism, hypocrisy and a bit of astronomy thrown in for good measure. It is another week of stories that are definitely Not Suitable For Broadcast.

In this episode, Niall Boylan speaks to Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín about the rising cost of fuel and the Government’s plans to unwind reductions in excise duty from September.

Tóibín says the Government is on course to collect around €1.7 billion in VAT on fuel this year, approximately €238 million more than last year, while motorists are still struggling with the cost of living. He also warns that drivers could face a series of fuel price increases across September, October and November as tax measures change. Niall asks whether motorists are once again being treated as an easy source of revenue, whether the Government should postpone the increases, and how much more families and commuters can realistically absorb.

Later, Niall opens the phone lines on a very different and difficult question.

Ukrainians living in accommodation centres across Limerick and Clare have reportedly been given notice to leave, with some expected to find and pay for their own accommodation or fund their journey home. Those with exceptional circumstances may still qualify for additional support.

The discussion turns to younger Ukrainian men who may fear returning home because of the war and the possibility of being expected to fight. Niall asks listeners to put themselves in their shoes. If staying meant risking your life on the front line, would you remain and defend your country, or would you take your partner and children somewhere safe?

And if Ireland found itself at war tomorrow, and you had the choice between staying to fight or boarding a plane with your family and escaping to safety, what would you do?

On today’s show, Niall Boylan talks to podcaster Elaine Mullally about a family dilemma sent in by a listener who fears she and her husband are being taken advantage of by their own son.

Their 25-year-old son, his girlfriend and their two-year-old child moved into the family home so they could save for a place of their own. They pay no rent, and the grandparents regularly babysit while the young couple go out. But despite saying they are saving, the couple still enjoy regular takeaways, weekends away and nights out with friends, and they are now planning a week in Portugal this September.

When the listener’s husband suggested they needed to make more sacrifices if they were serious about buying a home, the couple became annoyed and told him it was none of his business how they spent their money.

Now he wants to give them three months’ notice to leave. His wife, however, is terrified that doing so could destroy their relationship with their son and, even worse, mean losing contact with the grandson she adores.

Niall and Elaine ask: Are these parents helping their son get on his feet, or are they simply funding his lifestyle? If you live rent-free with your parents to save for a home, do they have the right to question how you spend your money? And should the grandparents finally tell them to leave, even if it risks tearing the family apart?

Where should Ireland draw the line between free speech and hate speech?

In this episode, Niall talks to callers and Tomas O’Reilly, a Brussels based policy adviser and journalist whose work has previously appeared in Euronews and The European Conservative. Tomas currently works as a policy adviser in the European Parliament.

The discussion comes as a new official report highlighting racism and discrimination in Ireland reignites calls for tougher hate speech laws. The Irish Government previously dropped controversial proposed hate speech provisions following significant public and political opposition, but the debate is far from over.

Should freedom of speech protect opinions that many people consider deeply offensive, racist or discriminatory? Can words themselves cause enough harm to justify criminal prosecution? Is simply saying something offensive ever something that should make you a criminal? And, perhaps most importantly, who gets to decide what crosses the line?

Niall hears from callers with very different views on whether Ireland needs stronger protections against hate speech or whether expanding these laws could have a chilling effect on political debate, controversial opinions and freedom of expression.

Tomas also discusses his latest article for Gript, which examines a renewed push within the European Union to establish broader EU level rules covering online hate speech and hate crime.

Summary of Tomas O’Reilly’s Gript Article

Tomas reports that the European Commission is considering a new attempt to introduce EU wide minimum criminal rules covering online hate speech, after an earlier 2021 proposal stalled because it required unanimous agreement from member states. According to the article, Brussels is examining whether certain online hate offences could instead be dealt with under existing EU powers relating to crimes such as computer crime, potentially allowing measures to proceed through qualified majority voting rather than unanimity. The article also says Irish Justice Minister Jim O’Callaghan has expressed opposition to expanding the EU definition of hate crimes, while Ireland is separately facing infringement proceedings from the European Commission over whether its existing hate speech legislation sufficiently complies with EU requirements. The dispute could ultimately end up before the European Court of Justice.

Full piece available on gript media: