To support us on Patreon, go to patreon.com/twomancongress and join a tier!

In this episode, Chad discusses Liebeck v. Mcdonald's. This case is famous for the compensation Ms. Liebeck received for her injuries from hot coffee.

Although not related to Constitutional law, this case serves as a reminder of how the actions of one party may influence judicial decisions.

We hope you enjoy this episode. Please leave us a 5-star rating and review.

Support the show

Disclaimers:
1. Nearly all of our episodes are unedited. We want to give you raw footage, meaning there will be bumps, dings, and pops.
2. The information contained in these episodes is for educational purposes only, not to be used as legal advice.
3. If the information is used as legal advice, Law Schoolers is not liable for any legal outcomes.