
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


If you would like to support us, go to patreon.com/twomancongress/
Chad and I discuss the arguments for and against Originalism and Contemporary methods of interpreting the Constitution.
Because of current events, we felt like this topic is necessary today so that people understand how the Supreme Court works with its relationship to the Constitution.
Thank you for listening and for your support. Please share this episode with your family and friends. We love you all!
Support the show
Disclaimers:
1. Nearly all of our episodes are unedited. We want to give you raw footage, meaning there will be bumps, dings, and pops.
2. The information contained in these episodes is for educational purposes only, not to be used as legal advice.
3. If the information is used as legal advice, Law Schoolers is not liable for any legal outcomes.
By Law Schoolers3.4
99 ratings
If you would like to support us, go to patreon.com/twomancongress/
Chad and I discuss the arguments for and against Originalism and Contemporary methods of interpreting the Constitution.
Because of current events, we felt like this topic is necessary today so that people understand how the Supreme Court works with its relationship to the Constitution.
Thank you for listening and for your support. Please share this episode with your family and friends. We love you all!
Support the show
Disclaimers:
1. Nearly all of our episodes are unedited. We want to give you raw footage, meaning there will be bumps, dings, and pops.
2. The information contained in these episodes is for educational purposes only, not to be used as legal advice.
3. If the information is used as legal advice, Law Schoolers is not liable for any legal outcomes.

508 Listeners

193 Listeners

443 Listeners

47 Listeners

60 Listeners

78 Listeners