
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


You’re listening to the August episode of 3 Minute 3Rs.
The papers behind the pod:
1. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PloS Biology https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
2. Acute and chronic stress prevents responses to pain in zebrafish: evidence for stress-induced analgesia. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://jeb.biologists.org/content/223/14/jeb224527
3. 3Rs-based optimization of mice behavioral testing: The habituation/dishabituation olfactory test. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108550
Transcript:
It’s the 3rd Thursday of August, and you’re listening to 3 Minute 3Rs, your monthly recap of efforts to replace, reduce, and refine the use of animals in research. This month we’ve got papers on fish pain and a refined mouse olfaction task. But let’s kick the episode off with the arrival of ARRIVE 2.0
[NC3Rs] Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. A lack of experimental detail in publications reporting in vivo experiments, such as experimental design and statistical analysis used, means researchers cannot adequately scrutinise the experimental results or repeat experiments. Consequently, data from these published experiments do not contribute to the knowledge base as researchers need to perform or to develop experimental procedures themselves. To highlight the information required the ARRIVE guidelines were developed in 2010. Although these guidelines were widely endorsed by journals and funders they have not led to improvements in reporting.
To address this, ARRIVE 2.0 has been launched and published in PLOS Biology. The recommendations have been organised into two sets, so scientists can more easily incorporate them into their reporting. The first set, the essential 10 constitute the minimum reporting requirement for reviewers and readers to assess the reliability of the findings presented. The second set, the recommended set, provides further context to the study described. An Explanation and Elaboration document giving further information about each of the 21 items in ARRIVE 2.0 has also been published in PLOS Biology.
To learn more about ARRIVE 2.0, explore the recommendations and find resources, visit its new home on the web at arriveguidelines.org.
[Lab Animal] Next up, let’s think about pain processing. In mammals, studies have shown that stress can alter pain-detection thresholds. Acute stress can have an analgesic effect, while chronic sources can enhance responses to pain, an effect known as hyperalgesia. Both can potentially confound experiments.
Scientists at the University of Liverpool recently explored whether such stress-induced responses are also evident in zebrafish.
The short answer? Yes. The team looked at the behavior of acutely and chronically stressed fish, as well as stress-free controls, after fin clipping. Following the potentially painful procedure, unstressed fish swam more slowly and lingered near the bottom of their tanks.
No such change in behavior was observed in...
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
You’re listening to the July episode of 3 Minute 3Rs.
The papers behind the pod:
1. Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation. Nature review Neuroscience https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-020-0313-3
2. Inactivated rabies vaccines: Standardization of an in vitro assay for residual viable virus detection. Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008142
3. A novel biosafety level 2 compliant tuberculosis infection model using a ΔleuDΔpanCD double auxotroph of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and Galleria mellonella. Virulence https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2020.1781486
Transcript:
[NA3RsC] Reproducibility is a cornerstone of the scientific method. But unfortunately, it’s considered to be quite poor for all research findings, and especially animal studies. Experts in animal biology, experimental design, and statistics argue that one major cause of poor reproducibility is inappropriate standardization in the face of biological variation. In nature, individual animals and humans vary greatly as a result of the interaction between their genes and the environment. So if studies standardize this natural variation too much, then they risk producing findings that are not reproducible outside of a very specific set of conditions.
As a solution, experts recommend that researchers should deliberately diversify their study subjects such as by varying sex, genotype, age, and environmental conditions. This does not necessarily need to increase sample size or cost. And ultimately, this diversification can reduce long-term research costs, increase efficiency, and reduce overall animal suffering. To learn more, go online to read the full paper in Nature Perspectives.
[NC3Rs] Vaccines are a vital tool in the fight against disease. This includes neglected tropical diseases such as rabies, which kills around 60,000 people each year, mainly in Africa and Asia.
When inactivated rabies vaccines are produced, they go through many stages of quality control, including testing for any remaining live virus. This process traditionally uses a lot of animals, but a recent paper by Beatriz Lourenço Moreira and colleagues explores an alternative in vitro assay that could replace some of this animal use
The new method combines two in vitro techniques to create an assay that’s three times more sensitive than in vivo testing and five times quicker than other in vitro assays. What’s more, it could replace the use of animals in residual live virus detection, decreasing animal use in quality control by two thirds overall.
While further validation is needed, and regulatory challenges still exist, this study shows what the 3Rs have to offer in vaccine development. Read the paper now in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases.
[LA]...
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
You’re listening to the June episode of 3 Minute 3Rs.
The papers behind the pod:
Transcript
It’s the Third Thursday of June and you’re listening to 3 Minute 3Rs, your monthly recap of efforts to replace, reduce, and refine the use of animals in research. Instead of the usual 3 segments this month, we’re featuring two, in recognition of the two winners of the 2019 3Rs Prize, awarded by the NC3Rs and sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. We’ll start with a recap of Dr. Francesca Nunn’s paper on red mite interventions in poultry.
[NA3RsC] Laying hens can be infested with poultry red mites which causes major economic and animal welfare issues. These mites can cause anemia, reduced production, and even death. Current treatments are often inadequate and research methods to find new treatments typically have poor translation to field trials.
A recent paper in Veterinary Parasitology describes a novel, high-welfare method for evaluating poultry red mite interventions in vivo. This paper is the winner of 2020 NC3Rs 3Rs Prize award.
Nuun and colleagues developed and optimized a sealed mesh device that attaches to a hen’s thigh. The depth and width of the mesh is precisely sized to both contain the mites and allow them to feed on the hens. This device will both reduce and refine the use of animals in research by allowing efficient pre-screening of new treatments before they enter large field trials. To learn more, read the full paper online.
[NC3Rs] The second winner of the 2019 3Rs Prize award is Dr Marta Shahbazi from the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology for her work reducing the number of mice needed for embryonic developmental research.
Historically embryos have been difficult to culture beyond the implantation stage of pregnancy. But with up to 40 per cent of pregnancies ending by implantation, it’s a critical stage to understand. So researchers typically use extensive breeding programmes to generate transgenic mice and retrieve embryos needed for experiments with invasive surgeries.
Now, building upon previous research, Marta and colleagues have established advanced 3D cultures of human and mouse embryonic stem cells to mimic the embryo at implantation. Using these cultures, they’ve been able to study the cellular events triggering implantation in greater detail than ever before. Not only that, they’ve also replaced the use of 500 mice.
Groups worldwide are now adopting the cultures to answer their own biological questions about embryonic development. Why not join them, and check out Marta’s prize-winning research by following the link in the description.
With congratulations to Dr. Nunn and Dr. Shahbazi, that’ll do it for June! 3 Minute 3Rs is brought to you by the NC3Rs, the North American 3Rs Collaborative, and Lab Animal. Come back in July for three more 3rs papers.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
You’re listening to the May episode of 3 Minute 3Rs.
The papers behind the pod:
1 Refining rodent models of spinal cord injury: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113273
2 Preclinical validation of the micropipette-guided drug administration (MDA) method in the maternal immune activation model of neurodevelopmental disorders https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159120302543
3 Identifying obstacles preventing the uptake of tunnel handling methods for laboratory mice: An international thematic survey https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231454
Transcript
It’s the Third Thursday of May and you’re listening to 3 Minute 3Rs, your monthly recap of efforts to replace, reduce, and refine the use of animals in research. This episode, we’ll be talking about that last R, starting with a refined rodent model of spinal cord injury.
[NC3Rs] Spinal cord injury research relies heavily on the use of rodent models, but these models can cause significant suffering. To address this, the UK’s RSPCA convened an expert working group whose practical experience and expertise have informed a new set of recommendations on applying the 3Rs to rodent models of spinal cord injury.
The 13 recommendations include reducing the severity of cervical level injuries or applying them to just one side of the body; providing adequate pain relief as standard; and planning and publishing research in accordance with good practice guidelines. A common theme is finding a balance between refining protocols and reducing animal use – for example, the appropriate use of both male and female subjects to reduce sex bias and improve translatability.
If you work on spinal cord injury, these recommendations can help guide your 3Rs initiatives and ultimately improve treatments for those affected. Read them online now in Experimental Neurology.
[Lab Animal] Next, what if there was a better way to administer treatments to your mice? Oral gavage can cause stress and minipumps require surgery, while providing a drug in food or water for the animals to consume at their leisure can be imprecise.
To refine oral delivery, Joseph Scarborough and colleagues at the University of Zurich present their micropipette-guided drug administration, or MDA, method.
They trained their mice to voluntarily consume what was on offer from a micropipette by sweetening the deal, adding a touch of sweetened condensed milk mixed with water as a delivery vehicle. The mice found things palatable indeed but to validate the approach, the researchers compared pharmokinetic profiles of risperidone administered via traditional gavage and the new MDA method. Those profiles were similar, except for stress levels. Cortisone was lower in the animals who consumed the risperidone willingly.
To check out MDA protocol and see additional results with mouse models of maternal immune activation, see the publication in Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.
And finally, let’s take a look at...
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
You’re listening to the April episode of 3 Minute 3Rs, brought to you by the NC3Rs, North American 3Rs Collaborative, and Lab Animal.
The papers behind the pod:
1. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150618)
2. Engineering a 3D functional human peripheral nerve in vitro using the Nerve-on-a-Chip platform. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-45407-5
3. Laboratory Animal Welfare Meets Human Welfare: A Cross-Sectional Study of Professional Quality of Life, Including Compassion Fatigue in Laboratory Animal Personnel https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2020.00114/full
Transcript:
Still social distancing, 3 Minute 3Rs is back with your April recap of efforts to replace, reduce, and refine the use of animals in research. Let’s get right to it, starting this month with a replacement paper related to a topic that’s probably near the top of many of our minds.
[NC3Rs] Understandably, within recent weeks the focus of scientific research has predominantly shifted to COVID-19. While many experiments investigating treatment options or vaccines may require animals, there are opportunities where the 3Rs could be implemented in COVID-19 research.
Researchers in Beijing have been doing just that by using in vitro and in silico methods to investigate the impacts of Chloroquine and Hydroxycholoroquine, two drugs that have recently received media attention. In their publication in Clinical Infectious Diseases, Yao et al used an established cell line to determine both drugs reduced the replication of COVID-19 in vitro. When administered prior to viral challenge, Hydroxychloroquine provided increased protection over Chloroquine. The group then used existing data from clinical trials and in vivo studies to develop an in silico physiologically based pharmacokinetic model and investigate potential effective dosing regimens in humans. The data from this publication are now being used to inform the design of a future clinical trial.
While further experiments will be needed to confirm whether Hydroxycholoroquine is able to help patients with COVID-19, the publication demonstrates there continues to be opportunities to apply the 3Rs in scientific research. And where these opportunities exist, the 3Rs principles should always be considered.
[NA3RsC] Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and ALS are often serious, life-threatening, and without a cure. Treatments can help, but finding drugs that work in final human clinical trials has been challenging. In part, this is due to the difference in biology between human and animal models. Microphysiological systems hold potential to increase translation but developing neural related models...
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
From the publisher's feed
…