
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In this episode Darrel discusses the two Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals opinions that were published in 2022: U.S. v. Anderson and U.S. v. Heppermann. The first case deals with waiver and the second case focuses on statutory construction; although the legal issue was legal and factual sufficiency. We then turn to our advocacy portion where Major Allen Abrams discusses, and gives examples of, pacing and the impact it has on conveying meaning beyond the words themselves.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
In this episode Darrel discusses the two Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals opinions that were published in 2022: U.S. v. Anderson and U.S. v. Heppermann. The first case deals with waiver and the second case focuses on statutory construction; although the legal issue was legal and factual sufficiency. We then turn to our advocacy portion where Major Allen Abrams discusses, and gives examples of, pacing and the impact it has on conveying meaning beyond the words themselves.

90,932 Listeners

43,818 Listeners

228,901 Listeners

38,804 Listeners

26,236 Listeners

153,509 Listeners

1,067 Listeners

1,942 Listeners

112,200 Listeners

56,496 Listeners

15,890 Listeners

26,623 Listeners

45 Listeners

22 Listeners

619 Listeners