For the following passage, diagram the argument — where is the conclusion? Do the premises support the conclusion and how? Are there any fallacies?

You can find the answers tomorrow on patreon.com/kyliesturgess, where more resources and additional exercises are available for supporters of the podcast series.

It can be asserted that the suspect committed the murder. The forensic scientist said that the blood stains found at the murder site matched the blood of the suspect. We know that the forensic scientist is an expert in her field and has accurate tests. Fingerprints on the weapon used in the murder matched that of the suspect. 

Put your answer in the comments!