
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In today's episode Darrel discusses (at length) the issue of whether a client has a legitimate privacy interest in a forensic copy of electronic data seized from the client's electronic device, such as a cellular phone or laptop computer. In McDonnell v. Maryland, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals held that the appellant in that case rekindled his reasonable expectation of privacy in a mirror-image copy of his laptop's hard drive when he revoked consent to search. Major Allen Abrams then discusses when and how you might want to consider using open ended questions during your cross-examination.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
In today's episode Darrel discusses (at length) the issue of whether a client has a legitimate privacy interest in a forensic copy of electronic data seized from the client's electronic device, such as a cellular phone or laptop computer. In McDonnell v. Maryland, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals held that the appellant in that case rekindled his reasonable expectation of privacy in a mirror-image copy of his laptop's hard drive when he revoked consent to search. Major Allen Abrams then discusses when and how you might want to consider using open ended questions during your cross-examination.

111,863 Listeners

56,489 Listeners

14,234 Listeners

15,616 Listeners

29,193 Listeners

15,815 Listeners