
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
In this week's episode we discuss United States v. Kim, a recent CAAF case that speaks to unique aspects of pleading guilty to offenses speak to potentially constitutionally protected conduct, such as viewing legal pornography in the privacy of your home. We next discuss issues to consider when conducting the required hearing on the admissibility of defense proffered MRE 412 evidence when the government does not oppose the admission of the evidence.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
In this week's episode we discuss United States v. Kim, a recent CAAF case that speaks to unique aspects of pleading guilty to offenses speak to potentially constitutionally protected conduct, such as viewing legal pornography in the privacy of your home. We next discuss issues to consider when conducting the required hearing on the admissibility of defense proffered MRE 412 evidence when the government does not oppose the admission of the evidence.

113,121 Listeners

56,944 Listeners

14,337 Listeners

15,506 Listeners

29,272 Listeners

16,525 Listeners