
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In today's episode we discuss United States v. Shields; a recent CAAF opinion that points out two things: 1) Even when a search is conducted pursuant to a lawful search authorization, the search must still be reasonable within the bounds of that authorization, and 2) Military Judge's have extremely broad discretion when it comes to findings of fact. We then discuss group voir dire with some thoughts on how to phrase your questions to make them less confusing and more conversational.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
In today's episode we discuss United States v. Shields; a recent CAAF opinion that points out two things: 1) Even when a search is conducted pursuant to a lawful search authorization, the search must still be reasonable within the bounds of that authorization, and 2) Military Judge's have extremely broad discretion when it comes to findings of fact. We then discuss group voir dire with some thoughts on how to phrase your questions to make them less confusing and more conversational.

90,966 Listeners

43,891 Listeners

228,907 Listeners

38,807 Listeners

26,241 Listeners

153,524 Listeners

1,069 Listeners

1,942 Listeners

112,031 Listeners

56,537 Listeners

15,852 Listeners

26,625 Listeners

46 Listeners

22 Listeners

613 Listeners