
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
This is the last episode for Season 2 of Litigator Libations! In this week's episode I discuss two recent cases from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Specifically, United States v. Anderson, where CAAF rejects the arguments in favor or requiring unanimous verdicts at courts-martial and United States v. Smith, where CAAF stretches the excited utterance hearsay exception to cover epiphanies. We then turn to Major Allen Abrams who discusses the Clergy privilege by not only explaining the rule, but giving great advice on how the rules applies to clients and other witnesses and things counsel should do when the privilege may come into play.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
This is the last episode for Season 2 of Litigator Libations! In this week's episode I discuss two recent cases from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Specifically, United States v. Anderson, where CAAF rejects the arguments in favor or requiring unanimous verdicts at courts-martial and United States v. Smith, where CAAF stretches the excited utterance hearsay exception to cover epiphanies. We then turn to Major Allen Abrams who discusses the Clergy privilege by not only explaining the rule, but giving great advice on how the rules applies to clients and other witnesses and things counsel should do when the privilege may come into play.

90,932 Listeners

43,818 Listeners

228,901 Listeners

38,804 Listeners

26,236 Listeners

153,509 Listeners

1,067 Listeners

1,942 Listeners

112,200 Listeners

56,496 Listeners

15,890 Listeners

26,623 Listeners

45 Listeners

22 Listeners

619 Listeners