You've heard it before: support your position with data. But what if the data doesn't hold up?

This week on S4N, Gene unpacks the chilling case of Sally Clark – a British solicitor wrongfully convicted by numbers that looked airtight and were completely wrong – to expose how numbers can distort, not clarify, high-stakes decisions.

We break down the prosecutor's fallacy, the critical difference between precision and accuracy, and why data that appears authoritative can be fundamentally wrong. More importantly, we translate this into practical negotiation insight, so you can interrogate data, challenge assumptions, and avoid blindly trusting expert analysis.

When you trust data too much, and when your belief in your case outpaces what the data can actually support, decisions fall apart. This episode exposes a simple truth: the quality of your decisions is only as good as the quality of the information behind them.

Whether you're negotiating a deal or evaluating risk, this episode will sharpen your skepticism – and your judgment.

Remember: negotiation is life.

Mentioned in this episode:

• The Maths of Life and Death by Kit Yates