
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
In this week's episode I discuss Smith v. Arizona, which is a case currently pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court heard argument on the case on January 10, 2024. The issue is how the Confrontation Clause may limit expert witness testimony. Specifically, in Smith an expert testified that the substances seized from Smith were marijuana and methamphetamine based on his review of another expert's report and notes. The expert also testified as to the steps the non-testifying expert took, her process, and the results. Was Smith denied confrontation? We also hear from Major Ciara who gives a very helpful discussion on how to approach the sentencing case - even for those challenging clients.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
In this week's episode I discuss Smith v. Arizona, which is a case currently pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court heard argument on the case on January 10, 2024. The issue is how the Confrontation Clause may limit expert witness testimony. Specifically, in Smith an expert testified that the substances seized from Smith were marijuana and methamphetamine based on his review of another expert's report and notes. The expert also testified as to the steps the non-testifying expert took, her process, and the results. Was Smith denied confrontation? We also hear from Major Ciara who gives a very helpful discussion on how to approach the sentencing case - even for those challenging clients.

111,948 Listeners

56,508 Listeners

14,250 Listeners

15,592 Listeners

29,207 Listeners

15,950 Listeners