
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In this week's episode I discuss Smith v. Arizona, which is a case currently pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court heard argument on the case on January 10, 2024. The issue is how the Confrontation Clause may limit expert witness testimony. Specifically, in Smith an expert testified that the substances seized from Smith were marijuana and methamphetamine based on his review of another expert's report and notes. The expert also testified as to the steps the non-testifying expert took, her process, and the results. Was Smith denied confrontation? We also hear from Major Ciara who gives a very helpful discussion on how to approach the sentencing case - even for those challenging clients.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
In this week's episode I discuss Smith v. Arizona, which is a case currently pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court heard argument on the case on January 10, 2024. The issue is how the Confrontation Clause may limit expert witness testimony. Specifically, in Smith an expert testified that the substances seized from Smith were marijuana and methamphetamine based on his review of another expert's report and notes. The expert also testified as to the steps the non-testifying expert took, her process, and the results. Was Smith denied confrontation? We also hear from Major Ciara who gives a very helpful discussion on how to approach the sentencing case - even for those challenging clients.

90,932 Listeners

43,818 Listeners

228,694 Listeners

38,800 Listeners

26,224 Listeners

153,509 Listeners

1,066 Listeners

1,942 Listeners

112,200 Listeners

56,496 Listeners

15,863 Listeners

26,623 Listeners

45 Listeners

22 Listeners

619 Listeners