With the gracious hosting of Amos Wollen, myself and Noah McKay debated Alex Malpass and Nathan Bray on the question of God's existence - specifically, theism versus naturalism. Noah and I defended theism via appeal to a historical case for miracles and the fine-tuning of the universe for life. Alex and Nathan contended that theism was no better an explanation for these phenomena than naturalism, and that because naturalism is simpler than theism then, all thing being equal, we ought to prefer it to theism. This was an exciting, substantive exchange, and I hope you like it.

Video of this interview is available on YouTube.

To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee.

Follow me on X-formerly-Twitter.

EPISODE CHAPTERS

00:00:00 Introduction

01:50 Miles's opening statement

07:15 Noah's opening statement

13:29 Nathan's opening statement

19:28 Alex's opening statement

25:58 Cross-examining Miles

46:39 Cross-examining Noah

01:06:48 Cross-examining Nathan

01:27:09 Cross-examining Alex

01:47:12 Closing statements

Get full access to Miles K. Donahue at mileskdonahue.substack.com/subscribe