
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
This week we discuss the case of United States v. Guihama, where the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces revisits the issue of the quantum of evidence required to corroborate a confession before the confession can be admitted in evidence (spoiler alert - not much). We then hear from Lt Col Tony Ghiotto who returns with weaponizing the rules of evidence and narrows in on character evidence.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
This week we discuss the case of United States v. Guihama, where the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces revisits the issue of the quantum of evidence required to corroborate a confession before the confession can be admitted in evidence (spoiler alert - not much). We then hear from Lt Col Tony Ghiotto who returns with weaponizing the rules of evidence and narrows in on character evidence.

90,894 Listeners

43,819 Listeners

228,796 Listeners

38,797 Listeners

26,225 Listeners

153,474 Listeners

1,064 Listeners

1,942 Listeners

112,060 Listeners

56,481 Listeners

15,853 Listeners

26,615 Listeners

45 Listeners

22 Listeners

620 Listeners