
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
This week we discuss the case of United States v. Guihama, where the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces revisits the issue of the quantum of evidence required to corroborate a confession before the confession can be admitted in evidence (spoiler alert - not much). We then hear from Lt Col Tony Ghiotto who returns with weaponizing the rules of evidence and narrows in on character evidence.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
This week we discuss the case of United States v. Guihama, where the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces revisits the issue of the quantum of evidence required to corroborate a confession before the confession can be admitted in evidence (spoiler alert - not much). We then hear from Lt Col Tony Ghiotto who returns with weaponizing the rules of evidence and narrows in on character evidence.

113,121 Listeners

56,944 Listeners

14,337 Listeners

15,506 Listeners

29,272 Listeners

16,525 Listeners