
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In this week's episode we discuss the AFCCA case of United States v. Hunt, where the AFCCA applies the new factual sufficiency analysis and concludes that the government failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt -- a huge defense win. We then hear from Allen Abrams on Military Rule of Evidence 105 -- Allen does an excellent job of conveying the importance of the rule and how defenders can harness its power to ensure evidence is used in the manner most beneficial to the client.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
In this week's episode we discuss the AFCCA case of United States v. Hunt, where the AFCCA applies the new factual sufficiency analysis and concludes that the government failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt -- a huge defense win. We then hear from Allen Abrams on Military Rule of Evidence 105 -- Allen does an excellent job of conveying the importance of the rule and how defenders can harness its power to ensure evidence is used in the manner most beneficial to the client.

91,032 Listeners

43,919 Listeners

229,264 Listeners

38,779 Listeners

26,222 Listeners

154,120 Listeners

1,085 Listeners

1,948 Listeners

112,934 Listeners

56,548 Listeners

16,096 Listeners

26,639 Listeners

45 Listeners

21 Listeners

621 Listeners