The Court held that pure omissions are not actionable under SEC Rule 10b-5(b). The failure to disclose information required by Item 303 can support a Rule 10b-5(b) claim only if the omission renders affirmative statements made misleading.

Read more cases at https://9robes.ai

The Court held that the Takings Clause does not distinguish between legislative and administrative land-use permit conditions. The Court vacated the judgment of the California Court of Appeal and remanded the case for further proceedings.

More SCOTUS cases at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court ruled that a transportation worker does not need to work in the transportation industry to be exempt from coverage under Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act. The Court vacated the Second Circuit's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Read the case summaries at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's ruling that the government failed to demonstrate the case was moot after removing Yonas Fikre from the No Fly List. The Court held that the government's declaration that Fikre would not be placed on the list again based on current information was insufficient to show the challenged conduct could not reasonably be expected to recur.

Hear and read more opinions at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion in Lindke v. Freed. The Court found that the Ninth Circuit's approach to determining state action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 differed from the approach elaborated in Lindke v. Freed.

The Supreme Court held that a public official's social media activity constitutes state action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 only if the official (1) possessed actual authority to speak on the State's behalf on a particular matter, and (2) purported to exercise that authority when speaking in the relevant social media posts. The Court vacated the judgment of the Sixth Circuit and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Find this and other U.S. Supreme Court Opinions at https://9robes.ai

The Court held that a defendant facing a mandatory minimum sentence is eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) only if he satisfies each of the provision's three conditions - he does not have more than four criminal-history points, does not have a prior three-point offense, and does not have a prior two-point violent offense. The Court rejected the defendant's argument that he only needed to lack the combination of all three characteristics to be eligible for relief.

Find this and more U.S. Supreme Court summaries at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to exclude former President Trump from the state's 2024 presidential primary ballot. The Court ruled that states do not have the authority to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against federal officeholders and candidates, including presidential candidates. The Court held that responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress, not individual states.

Read and listen to more cases at https://9robes.ai

The Supreme Court ruled that the jury's verdict of "not guilty by reason of insanity" on the malice murder charge constituted an acquittal for double jeopardy purposes, even though it was inconsistent with guilty verdicts on other charges. The Double Jeopardy Clause therefore bars retrial of McElrath on the malice murder charge.

Find more case summaries at 9robes.ai

The Supreme Court held that a consumer may sue a federal agency for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). The Court found that the FCRA includes a clear waiver of sovereign immunity, allowing consumers to seek damages against federal agencies that provide false information to credit reporting agencies.

Find this case and others like it at 9robes.ai