Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share A Brief History of Section 230, With Patrick Carome
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
A Brief History of Section 230, With Patrick Carome
Patrick Carome, one of the leading advocates in Section 230 litigation famous for representing AOL in the landmark Section 230 case, Zeran v. AOL, joins Ellysse and Ashley to explore the history behind Section 230, Congress' intentions in passing it, and the foundational case that set the precedent for how courts interpret it.
Mentioned:
- Zeran v. Am. Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997).
- Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Servs. Co., No. 31063/94, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 229 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 24, 1995).
- Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe, Inc., 776 F. Supp. 135 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).
Related:
- Ashley Johnson and Daniel Castro, “The Exceptions to Section 230: How Have Courts Interpreted Section 230?” (ITIF, February 2021).
View all episodes
By Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF)
5
1111 ratings
Patrick Carome, one of the leading advocates in Section 230 litigation famous for representing AOL in the landmark Section 230 case, Zeran v. AOL, joins Ellysse and Ashley to explore the history behind Section 230, Congress' intentions in passing it, and the foundational case that set the precedent for how courts interpret it.
Mentioned:
- Zeran v. Am. Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997).
- Stratton Oakmont, Inc. v. Prodigy Servs. Co., No. 31063/94, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 229 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 24, 1995).
- Cubby, Inc. v. CompuServe, Inc., 776 F. Supp. 135 (S.D.N.Y. 1991).
Related:
- Ashley Johnson and Daniel Castro, “The Exceptions to Section 230: How Have Courts Interpreted Section 230?” (ITIF, February 2021).
More shows like Ellysse and Ashley Break the Internet
View all
Freakonomics Radio
32,237 Listeners
The Daily
111,438 Listeners