
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, I deal with the incoherence in Andy Stanley's apologetic method and theology. It is impossible to separate "the Bible says" from what Matthew or Luke or Paul says. What the authors of the Bible say, the Bible says. Moreover, if one of the authors of Scripture proves unreliable in regards to one miracle, say the virgin birth, then how can we consider that author to be reliable regarding his claim about any miracle? The first step in being able to defend Christianity is to make sure you actually have the true version of Christianity.
By Edward Dingess4.2
3131 ratings
In this episode, I deal with the incoherence in Andy Stanley's apologetic method and theology. It is impossible to separate "the Bible says" from what Matthew or Luke or Paul says. What the authors of the Bible say, the Bible says. Moreover, if one of the authors of Scripture proves unreliable in regards to one miracle, say the virgin birth, then how can we consider that author to be reliable regarding his claim about any miracle? The first step in being able to defend Christianity is to make sure you actually have the true version of Christianity.

8,591 Listeners

37,434 Listeners

1,947 Listeners

1,164 Listeners

3,128 Listeners

1,088 Listeners

47,496 Listeners

1,394 Listeners

982 Listeners

233 Listeners

1,186 Listeners

591 Listeners

16,894 Listeners

113 Listeners