
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, I deal with the incoherence in Andy Stanley's apologetic method and theology. It is impossible to separate "the Bible says" from what Matthew or Luke or Paul says. What the authors of the Bible say, the Bible says. Moreover, if one of the authors of Scripture proves unreliable in regards to one miracle, say the virgin birth, then how can we consider that author to be reliable regarding his claim about any miracle? The first step in being able to defend Christianity is to make sure you actually have the true version of Christianity.
By Edward Dingess4.2
3131 ratings
In this episode, I deal with the incoherence in Andy Stanley's apologetic method and theology. It is impossible to separate "the Bible says" from what Matthew or Luke or Paul says. What the authors of the Bible say, the Bible says. Moreover, if one of the authors of Scripture proves unreliable in regards to one miracle, say the virgin birth, then how can we consider that author to be reliable regarding his claim about any miracle? The first step in being able to defend Christianity is to make sure you actually have the true version of Christianity.

8,698 Listeners

37,394 Listeners

1,946 Listeners

1,164 Listeners

3,156 Listeners

1,092 Listeners

47,718 Listeners

1,394 Listeners

983 Listeners

232 Listeners

1,190 Listeners

590 Listeners

16,982 Listeners

125 Listeners