
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, I deal with the incoherence in Andy Stanley's apologetic method and theology. It is impossible to separate "the Bible says" from what Matthew or Luke or Paul says. What the authors of the Bible say, the Bible says. Moreover, if one of the authors of Scripture proves unreliable in regards to one miracle, say the virgin birth, then how can we consider that author to be reliable regarding his claim about any miracle? The first step in being able to defend Christianity is to make sure you actually have the true version of Christianity.
By Edward Dingess4.2
3131 ratings
In this episode, I deal with the incoherence in Andy Stanley's apologetic method and theology. It is impossible to separate "the Bible says" from what Matthew or Luke or Paul says. What the authors of the Bible say, the Bible says. Moreover, if one of the authors of Scripture proves unreliable in regards to one miracle, say the virgin birth, then how can we consider that author to be reliable regarding his claim about any miracle? The first step in being able to defend Christianity is to make sure you actually have the true version of Christianity.

8,635 Listeners

37,573 Listeners

1,937 Listeners

1,171 Listeners

3,132 Listeners

1,082 Listeners

47,842 Listeners

1,389 Listeners

989 Listeners

230 Listeners

1,165 Listeners

589 Listeners

16,943 Listeners

113 Listeners