In tonights episode, James Hohepa Smith and I discuss the toxic soil proposed for Wyndham Vale and Bacchus Marsh (right next to one of Victoria's major food bowls). We go over the contamination risks as identified by the USA EPA, the harm that can happen and who should be worried.
And I have to ask, why would Labor poison Melbourne's food, why would they dump a toxic mess in their heartland?
Especially when you read quotes like this, "The class of chemicals, called PFAS, are in non-stick pans, water-resistant clothes, food packaging and firefighting foam. Nicknamed “forever chemicals”, they do not break down in the environment and accumulate in the human body. Numerous studies link PFAS exposure with cancer, thyroid problems and developmental issues in children."
Some links to check out for yourself -
USA EPA INFO: https://www.epa.gov/pfas/basic-information-pfas#health
Both 3M (Scotchgard) and DuPont (Teflon) have ceased production of PFOA and PFAS in the USA: https://qz.com/1643554/3m-knew-pfas-was-contaminating-us-food-supply/
Companies deny responsibility for toxic ‘forever chemicals’ contamination: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/sep/11/pfas-toxic-forever-chemicals-hearing-3m-dupont-chemours
The Planning Scheme Amendment Process (from Moorabool Shire Council)
The owners of the site propose to request the Minister for Planning to intervene, to prepare an amendment to the Moorabool Planning Scheme under section 20(4) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. Section 20(4) refers to the ability of the Minister for Planning to amend the Planning Scheme without consultation. It is however discretionary on the Minister as to whether consultation occurs and to what extent.
Any person can request Ministerial intervention to prepare an amendment to a planning scheme. The planning practice note ‘Ministerial Powers of Intervention in Planning and Heritage Matters (2004)’ provides criteria that is considered by the Minister in making a decision on whether to intervene.
The process for requesting Ministerial intervention can be summarised as follows:
1. The applicant will request the Minister’s intervention.
2. Minister considers the request in accordance with the following criteria:
- The matter will be one of genuine State or regional significance.
- The matter will give effect to an outcome where the issues have been reasonably considered and the views of affected parties are known.
- The matter will be the introduction of an interim provision or requirement and substantially the same provision or requirement is also subject to a separate process of review (such as the introduction of permanent controls in a planning scheme).
- The matter will raise issues of fairness or public interest.
- The matter requires co-ordination to facilitate decision
-making by more than one agency.
If the Minister decides to intervene, there is no requirement for public notification under the Planning and Environment Act 1987. There is also no requirement for consultation with Council.
This episode contains material used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)
Tone's Review is made for an adult audience. Viewer discretion is advised.
---
Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/tony-hooper/message