
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Tribe of Dan is one of the twelve tribes of Israel, named after Dan, the first of two sons born to Jacob and Bilhah, the maidservant of Jacob’s second wife, Rachel. The tribe is associated with early instances of idolatry in Israel, particularly during the reign of Jeroboam I, who established a shrine in the city of Dan that included a golden calf dedicated to Baal. Notably, the Tribe of Dan is absent from the list of the 144,000 sealed tribes of Israel in Revelation 7. This omission has led to various speculations and interpretations among scholars and theologians regarding the tribe’s spiritual significance and possible future role in prophecy. In the Bible, Dan is symbolically associated with a snake, based on the blessing Jacob gave him in Genesis 49. This serpent imagery has contributed to the tribe’s negative portrayal in biblical tradition. What other animal is associated with the Tribe of Dan? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #349.
A 1998 film starring Nicolas Cage, ‘Snake Eyes’, began trending following the recent murder of Charlie Kirk. The movie takes place over a single night at a casino in Atlantic City during a heavyweight boxing match. Notably, the date shown on the event marquee is September 10—the same day Kirk was assassinated. The marquee also features the name of the defending champion: Tyler “The Executioner.” This drew attention, as the man who is being charged with executing Charlie Kirk is also named Tyler. The parallels don’t end there. The film’s plot revolves around the assassination of a politician, shot in the neck—just like Kirk. The character’s name? Charles Kirkland. Is this all a coincidence? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #348.
FBI Director Kash Patel shocked the nation last weekend when he revealed on social media that the FBI is still actively investigating the murder of Charlie Kirk. He stated that the bureau is examining numerous aspects of the case, including several conspiracy theories that have been circulating. He said they were still investigating the location from where the shot was taken, the possibility of accomplices, the text message confession and related conversations, Discord chats, the angle of the shot and bullet impact, how the weapon was transported, hand gestures observed as potential signals, and visitors to the alleged shooter’s residence in the hours and days leading up to the assassination. Why was this post so shocking, and how confident can the public be in the narrative presented so far? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #347.
Human nature is not complicated. We are all born with the same basic instincts, and it’s easy for us to understand when people act in ways that align with this shared nature. But when someone behaves in a way that diverges from it, we often find it confusing—even foolish. For example, the moment when Charlie Kirk’s wife, Erika, spoke at his memorial and said she forgave the man who murdered her husband. Many people admitted they could never do what she had done. Even President Trump, speaking after her, implied he could not imagine offering such mercy. Why is her act of forgiveness so difficult for most people to comprehend? Because it is supernatural, and it transcends every natural instinct we possess. What is the source of that supernatural strength, and how can you have it too? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #346.
The outraged cries about threats to free speech following ABC Disney's suspension of 'Jimmy Kimmel Live' ring hollow—especially coming from the same voices that once cheered when Roseanne Barr was fired for comments about former National Security Advisor Susan Rice. These same individuals also pushed for Tucker Carlson’s removal from Fox News and celebrated when it happened. They applauded social media companies for suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story ahead of the 2020 election and supported censorship of dissenting views during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly around vaccines and alternative treatments. Yet now, they claim to be defenders of free speech and the First Amendment. How does their sudden concern only serve to highlight their hypocrisy? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #345.
Over the past few days, since the brutal assassination of Charlie Kirk, many on the political left have argued that political violence in America is a problem on both sides of the aisle. However, while making that case, numerous individuals on the left have simultaneously been posting videos that callously celebrate and mock Kirk’s death. Some have recorded themselves singing gleeful songs with lyrics like “we got Charlie in the neck,” while others have created T-shirts depicting him being shot, accompanied by slogans such as “debate this” and “protect ya neck.” This widespread mockery and celebration of his murder is coming exclusively from the left. What comparable examples exist of similar reactions from the right in response to a political figure’s murder? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #344.
Every year in late spring, as the semester winds down and universities prepare for commencement ceremonies, there is always at least one student who takes to social media to celebrate a particular accomplishment. It’s not just the achievement of completing their education and earning a degree, but they're celebrating the fact that they made it through college without becoming a liberal. In many ways, this is seen as a greater accomplishment than earning the degree itself, given that liberal indoctrination on college campuses has shaped the minds of the vast majority of students. How did Charlie Kirk help students reach this milestone, and why did that make him a threat to his opponents? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #343.
In various parts of Europe, a new trend has emerged among women who wear long, loose-fitting shirts—often referred to as "subway shirts"—while commuting on public transportation. The purpose of this clothing choice is to feel safer and reduce the risk of harassment during their daily travels. Many reports of harassment have surfaced in countries such as France and the United Kingdom, with many women sharing their experiences on social media. These posts often include demonstrations of how they use oversized shirts to conceal their figures, along with advice encouraging others to do the same. Is this trend a practical solution to protect women, or does it reflect a larger, unaddressed challenge related to migration and public safety in Europe? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode #342.
Tensions in the United Kingdom have escalated significantly, with civil unrest approaching dangerous levels. At the heart of the division is the contentious issue of illegal immigration. Many British citizens have expressed frustration over the increasing number of migrants crossing the English Channel and entering the country illegally. One form of protest is a campaign known as ‘Operation Raise the Colours’, where individuals display the Flag of England and the Union Jack in public spaces. Critics argue that the flags are racist, and they have gone so far as to call for a parliamentary ban on them. How is this situation similar to the ongoing immigration debate in the United States, and how has the success of the Trump administration at reducing illegal immigration inspired some in the UK to demand similar government action? Join the conversation and get answers to these questions and more on According2Sam episode 341. #unitedkingdom #ILLEGALimmigrants #RaiseTheColours
For nearly a decade, we’ve been told that Russian operatives hacked the Democratic National Committee and stole emails and other documents, which were then passed to WikiLeaks and published ahead of the 2016 election. Both WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and the Russian government have denied that Russia was the source of the leaked DNC materials. Although no definitive evidence has been publicly presented to prove Russia was responsible, many Americans still accept this claim as fact. However, recent declassifications and disclosures from the current Director of National Intelligence cast doubt on that narrative, revealing that parts of the intelligence community had only low confidence in Russia’s involvement. What, then, is the most likely source of the leaked DNC documents in 2016? Join the conversation and get answers to this question and more on According2Sam episode #340.
From the publisher's feed