Accounting in the Wild is back — with a renewed focus: by a small practitioner, for small practitioners.
Artificial intelligence is rapidly finding its way into tax practices, sometimes in obvious places like ChatGPT or Claude — and sometimes embedded in software we may not even realize is using AI.
The IRS recently weighed in with its initial thoughts on what tax professionals need to consider when using AI. In this episode, Jason Dinesen looks at that guidance through the eyes of the small practitioner.
We’ll talk about AI hallucinations and the importance of human review, the due-diligence and competency requirements of Circular 230, and why practitioners need procedures governing how AI is used in their firms.
We’ll also get into one of the biggest issues for tax professionals: client data. If client information is being provided to an AI tool, Sections 6713 and 7216 can come into play — meaning AI isn’t simply a technology issue. It can become a disclosure, consent, and potentially penalty issue.
And then there’s the question that caused plenty of debate among tax professionals: If AI makes us more efficient, what does that mean for what we charge clients?
Along the way, Jason makes the case for thinking of AI as something like junior staff: potentially very knowledgeable and capable of doing a lot of the heavy lifting, but still requiring an experienced practitioner to review the work, recognize when something doesn’t look right, and supply the nuance the machine may be missing.
Finally, we bring everything back to practical steps a small firm can take right now:
• Identify the AI tools you know you’re using — and the ones that may be embedded in other software.
• Determine whether client information is being shared with those tools.
• Review your client disclosures and consent procedures where necessary.
• Start documenting your firm’s AI policies and procedures.
• If you bill by the hour, consider how AI-assisted work affects your billing practices.
AI doesn’t have to be something small practitioners fear or ignore. But using it responsibly requires understanding what the tools are doing — and remembering that the practitioner is still ultimately responsible for the work.
Accounting in the Wild: by a small practitioner, for small practitioners.