Advanced Quantum Deep Dives

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

Welcome back, quantum explorers. I’m Leo—Learning Enhanced Operator—and the semantic noise of our everyday world feels muted compared to the hum inside a quantum laboratory. Speaking of noise, the research I’m diving into today actually turns down that background static—perhaps for good.

Picture this: Just two days ago, in the journal Nature, researchers from Harvard announced they’d run a quantum computer with over 3,000 qubits—continuously, for more than two hours. To put this number in everyday terms, if a classical bit is a single lightbulb that’s either on or off, a qubit is a dazzling chandelier—each crystal not just shining, but existing in blinding superposition, shimmering with possibility. Now, imagine a ballroom with 3,000 of those chandeliers, each entangled with the next, all oscillating in concert, the music never skipping a beat.

The scale is unprecedented. Harvard physicist Mikhail Lukin called this the “first quantum machine able to operate continuously without restarting,” eliminating a nagging limitation for real-world quantum computations. To give context: Caltech, this same week, demonstrated a 6,100-qubit system. But that system could only hum along for 13 seconds. Harvard’s “living organism,” as they dub it, not only features reconfigurable atom arrays, letting them literally change connections between qubits mid-calculation, but can keep the quantum melody going for hours.

Why does this matter? In classical computing, doubling bits doubles power. In quantum, every new qubit scales the system’s capability exponentially. That 3,000-qubit breakthrough? It brings us closer to simulating everything from protein folding for medicine to new materials for energy. Imagine finance algorithms that see risk spread out in parallel universes, or pharmaceuticals discovered by mapping molecules in dimensions traditional computers can’t even peek into.

But the truly surprising fact is how Harvard’s team engineered stability and scalability in tandem. Using arrays of individually trapped neutral atoms, controlled with lasers and cooled just above absolute zero, they achieved a dynamic connectivity—the quantum version of rewiring a jet cockpit, mid-flight, at Mach 3. This adaptability could mean quantum hardware soon evolves from specialized scientific instruments into general-purpose supercomputers with profound practical impact.

I see a parallel with today’s current events: rapid escalation, but also unprecedented resilience—markets adapting, societies shifting, the world reconfiguring itself for unknowns. Quantum computers are no different; they thrive in uncertainty, spin chaos into calculation.

As always, I want to thank you for joining me on Advanced Quantum Deep Dives. If today’s whirlwind leaves you with questions, or there’s a topic you’d like me to untangle on air, send an email to [email protected]. Don’t forget to subscribe to Advanced Quantum Deep Dives, and remember:

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

Today, the quantum world delivered another seismic jolt—and I’m still buzzing from it. I’m Leo, your Learning Enhanced Operator—and as a quantum computing specialist, I see the qubit’s weird dance everywhere, from the pulse of city traffic to this very podcast beam. This morning, a study fresh off the press from Diraq and imec marked a milestone for silicon-based quantum chips. Years of speculation just crystallized into fact: we can now mass-produce quantum chips in conventional semiconductor foundries with world-class accuracy, bridging the chasm between fragile laboratory prototypes and market-ready quantum processors.

Picture it: rows of machines at a foundry, hissing and humming, etching features smaller than a virus with astonishing precision. But these aren’t just classical transistors—inside each chip, electrons are coaxed into qubits. Here’s where it gets dramatic. Unlike ordinary bits, qubits tap into superposition and entanglement, meaning each is a swirling possibility cloud, not just a one or zero. Superposition allows a single qubit to hold both states simultaneously, like a spinning coin that’s both heads and tails until you catch it; entanglement synchronizes actions across distances. It’s as if, when two traffic lights halfway across Dubai blink green, you know something quantum is at play in the city’s veins.

Until now, the sticking point was scale. In the lab, physicists could craft perfect qubits in ones and twos—but could we fabricate millions, reliably, using the same manufacturing lines that build your phone’s microprocessor? Diraq, in partnership with imec, answered with a thundering yes. They demonstrated that complex two-qubit logic gates—think of them as paired dancers in a precisely choreographed waltz—retain fidelity above industry thresholds even when mass-produced. According to Professor Dzurak of Diraq, this eclipses achievements of earlier platforms such as superconducting or trapped-ion qubits in terms of compatibility with existing manufacturing.

Now, here’s today’s surprising fact. While you might expect quantum devices to require exotic materials, these silicon qubits run on the same technology as the chips powering your laptop, opening the door to scalable and cost-effective quantum computers that play nice with the trillion-dollar microchip ecosystem.

Why does this matter? Imagine simulating exotic materials for next-gen batteries, modeling the global climate with atom-by-atom detail, or cracking cryptographic locks once believed invincible. Each of these tasks—the real “quantum leap”—is within reach because of today’s breakthrough.

As I walk through TII’s Quantum Research Center here in Abu Dhabi—a symphony of chilled cryostats, blinking LEDs, and technicians hunched over oscilloscopes—I see everyday phenomena transformed by quantum’s lens, as if the world itself is one vast entangled system.

Thank you for tuning in to Advanced Quantum Deep Dives. If

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

Right now, in the heart of quantum computing, something electrifying just happened. Picture a packed laboratory at Harvard, sunlight slicing through the glass as researchers—hands steady, eyes intent—announce a two-hour, continuous quantum machine run using more than 3,000 qubits. Before this week, that kind of sustained computation was science fiction. But today, as the reverberations hit elite labs from Boston to Sydney, we find ourselves at the edge of a computing revolution that feels as primal as a thunderclap and as delicate as a spider’s web.

I’m Leo, the Learning Enhanced Operator. In my world, every day is an experiment—quantum logic crackling in supercooled chambers, atoms dancing to the rhythm of lasers. This week’s most captivating quantum research paper comes courtesy of QuEra Computing, Harvard, and Yale, and was published in Nature. It introduces “algorithmic fault tolerance”—think of it as a quantum immune system, slashing the time penalties of error correction. Traditionally, correcting errors in quantum algorithms was like trying to keep water from leaking out of a sieve. QuEra’s system cuts the runtime overhead drastically, so quantum computers can run longer and much bigger computations without collapsing under a blizzard of quantum mistakes.

What’s dramatic here isn’t just the speed. It’s that QuEra’s neutral atom quantum platforms work at room temperature—no need for those 300-kilogram cryostats resembling golden chandeliers, suspended just 0.01 degrees above absolute zero in places like the Czech Republic’s newly inaugurated VLQ Quantum Computer. This means easier deployment, scalability, and cost savings, with neutral atoms traveling along optical lattice conveyor belts, replenishing lost qubits seamlessly. Over two hours, Harvard’s system cycled through over fifty million atoms—a symphony of quantum action played out in real-time.

One surprising fact from this week: Caltech’s rival 6,100-qubit machine could only run for 13 seconds. Harvard’s model outperformed by orders of magnitude, not simply in scale but in endurance. Imagine upgrading from a sprint to a marathon, all while keeping information intact in a cloud of ultra-sensitive qubits.

Why does this matter to you? Quantum breakthroughs ripple through everyday life—superior financial algorithms emerged this week out of an HSBC and IBM collaboration, where quantum platforms pierced noisy bond market data to unravel pricing secrets faster than any classical computer could. Quantum isn’t just about numbers; it’s about transforming medicine, unlocking cures, optimizing traffic networks, and strengthening cybersecurity—all in an ecosystem that, after this week’s breakthrough, is starting to resemble a living, adaptable organism.

That’s the pulse of quantum research today. If you ever have questions or want a topic discussed, just send me an email at [email protected]. Remember to subscribe to Advanced Quantum Dee

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

Listen closely. The quantum world just shifted—and not quietly. This past week, a new paper co-authored by QuEra Computing, Harvard, and Yale dropped in Nature, and it’s sending shockwaves through quantum labs globally. The topic? Algorithmic Fault Tolerance, or AFT. If you’re picturing one of those mad, flickering quantum labs, wires everywhere, atoms frozen in beams of light, you’re in the right mindset. Because what’s changed is how we fight quantum errors—those pesky flips and blips that can wreck our best-laid calculations.

I’m Leo, the Learning Enhanced Operator, your guide to deep quantum dives. Today, I’m unpacking this paper’s drama. Traditionally, error correction in quantum computing is like juggling: keep one ball—say, a qubit—in motion, but every gust of noise threatens to knock it down. We’ve poured energy and dollars into making error correction robust, but it’s come with brutal runtime overheads, slowing the chase for practical quantum speedups. QuEra’s breakthrough introduces a transversal fault tolerance framework, allowing neutral-atom quantum computers to run error-corrected algorithms with slashed time overhead. What does that mean, practically? Faster computation, less resource drain, and a much clearer runway toward quantum advantage.

Picture a grid of perfectly identical atoms suspended by lasers, each a pristine qubit. The beauty of neutral-atom machines is their architectural flexibility—you can rearrange the qubit array almost at will, unlocking new ways to perform the intricate ballet of error correction. No need for cryogenic coolers the size of shopping carts; these machines hum at room temperature. The paper’s most surprising finding? The flexible connectivity of neutral atoms actually speeds up execution of complex algorithms, countering long-held views that “qubit shuttling” naturally slows the process. Instead, with this new AFT approach, performance rivals even the fastest superconducting platforms.

Why is this news so fresh? Because if you’re tracking the policy moves, just yesterday, the White House elevated quantum science and AI to the top tier of national R&D priorities, urging stakeholders to back scalable fault-tolerance in strategic plans. You’re seeing a global race to real applications, not just theory. Quantum is weaving into finance—HSBC and IBM demonstrated quantum bond trading just days ago. It’s connecting atoms across distances once thought impossible—UNSW announced quantum entanglement between atomic nuclei 20 nanometres apart, another leap forward.

Everywhere I look: parallels. Upgrades to European quantum infrastructure, new hybrid computing deployments, front-page news about scaling fidelity over millions of qubits. The world wants fault-tolerant quantum computers, and this week, the roadmap just got much shorter.

Now, if the quantum fog ever leaves you with questions or there’s a topic you’re dying to hear dissected, send an email to le

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

Imagine this: a quantum computer, not confined by traditional restart cycles, calculating with more than 3,000 qubits—each qubit shimmering in delicate superposition—and running continuously for over two hours. That’s not speculation, it’s the news from Harvard and MIT, published just yesterday in Nature. Their massive array, built in partnership with QuEra Computing, achieved something previously thought to be the stuff of science fiction. It’s as if someone installed a high-speed conveyor belt of atoms right in the heart of a quantum processor, allowing new qubits to be inserted and lost ones replaced without missing a beat. If you’ve ever watched air traffic at Heathrow—planes arriving and departing in seamless choreography—you’ll have a tiny glimpse of what’s happening inside these quantum machines.

I’m Leo, your Learning Enhanced Operator, and today on Advanced Quantum Deep Dives, I want to bring you inside this landmark achievement that’s reshaping our field’s boundaries.

Until now, a core flaw haunted neutral-atom quantum computers: “atom loss.” The information in a qubit could simply vanish mid-computation, grinding experiments to a halt while scientists painstakingly rebuilt the array. This new system, from Harvard’s Mikhail Lukin and MIT’s Vladan Vuletic, has qubits supplied on demand by optical lattice conveyor belts and laserguided optical tweezers, which arrange and reload atoms at breakneck speed—up to 300,000 per second. Over the course of an experiment, over 50 million atoms cycled through, yet the computation didn’t pause. The result? A platform robust enough to run day-long calculations, promising quantum machines that behave less like brittle prototypes and more like resilient, living organisms.

And here’s the twist: just as Wall Street banks are piloting quantum processors to gain an edge in market prediction—HSBC used IBM’s latest quantum chip this week to bump bond price forecasting by 34 percent—academic teams are showing that scale, flexibility, and error correction can finally coexist. In a separate Nature paper, the Harvard-MIT group also demonstrated a processor whose connectivity can be completely reshaped mid-computation, reconfiguring itself like a neural network reorganizing in real time. Imagine if your phone could change its hardware circuits to become a new device while you use it!

Here’s one more surprise: This week, Caltech published a 6,100-qubit system, the largest yet. But it could only run for 13 seconds. Meanwhile, Harvard’s quantum machine ran for hours. Longevity, it turns out, is the new horizon—the quantum equivalent of going not just faster, but farther.

Quantum technology is no longer just a laboratory marvel; it’s becoming an adaptable, enduring tool ready to unlock new domains in science, finance, and beyond. The future isn’t just quantum—it’s continuous, regenerative, and interconnected, much like the world’s most complex systems.

Thanks for

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

Today, I dropped an ice cube on my kitchen floor, and for a split second, I watched it wobble—caught between its crystal clarity and the chaos of my noisy breakfast. That fleeting dance, balanced between order and randomness, is how I see this week’s quantum news: poised on an edge, trembling with possibility.

I’m Leo, your Learning Enhanced Operator, and I’ve barely slept. Quantum computing headlines are bursting faster than decoherence times at room temperature, and this week, one paper stood out like a superposition popping into measurement.

Nature Physics just published groundbreaking work from the University of Chicago’s Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering. Most quantum computers speak in whispers of light—photons shuttling fragile data between chilled islands of superconducting metal. But in Chicago’s Cleland and Jiang labs, they're tuning a different instrument: sound. Not the vibrations you hear with coffee shop jazz, but quantum sound—phonons, the tiniest mechanical shivers in the fabric of matter itself.

Here's what’s wild: the researchers demonstrated deterministic phase control of single phonons, meaning they could control the outcome of sending this quantum “sound bit.” Quantum developments often feel like rolling loaded dice, outcomes tinged with an inherent randomness. In contrast, Chicago’s team orchestrated quantum operations that behave cause-and-effect, not chance and maybes. Imagine if every order you placed online, no matter the hour, arrived flawlessly every time—deterministic, not probabilistic. That’s a seismic leap in quantum land.

This trick relies on scattering a phonon off a superconducting qubit, allowing precise phase control of the vibration, rather than the uncertainty-laden communication of photons. It’s all conducted at ultracold temperatures, of course—the same regime as Europe’s brand new VLQ quantum computer, unveiled yesterday in Ostrava, Czech Republic. That system runs its 24 superconducting qubits a hairsbreadth—just 0.01 degrees—above absolute zero, inside an opulent cryostat that could double as Versailles’ most decadent chandelier. Both the VLQ project and Chicago’s phononic advance show the breathtaking breadth in today’s quantum efforts.

Perhaps the most surprising detail: controlled phonons might, in theory, outlive photons by several orders of magnitude. While photons, those energetic showoffs, constantly evaporate into surrounding space, a phonon’s vibration can linger—potentially, with fine engineering, for full seconds. That’s an eternity for quantum memory.

If you squint, you can see the parallels in today’s international politics: alliances forming, old rivals collaborating, all striving to freeze out the “noise” and stay coherent just long enough to shape the future.

Thanks for diving deep with me. If you’ve got questions, or a burning topic for the quantum spotlight, email me at [email protected]. And don’t forget to subscribe

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

If you’re listening right now, get ready to step into a lab where the future sounds like the delicate hum of cryostats and the faint clatter of cooling ions. I’m Leo, Learning Enhanced Operator, your guide on Advanced Quantum Deep Dives—and today is Monday, September 22, 2025. Quantum research is surging, the news cycle whirls with breakthroughs, and the world outside feels like it's at the cusp of a seismic shift—a perfect day to talk quantum.

Let me take you straight into a room that, in my mind, feels like the nerve center of the universe: racks of electronics, a vacuum chamber glowing with laser light, and a scientist’s hand nudging a cloud of rubidium atoms into place using optical tweezers. Last week, the biggest headline in quantum came from Harvard’s physics team, led by Mikhail Lukin. You may have seen it in Nature—a paper where researchers revealed a fully operational atomic “conveyor belt.” Picture an orderly grid of more than 3,000 rubidium atoms, each 9 micrometers from its neighbor, suspended midair in a high-vacuum vessel.

What’s the drama here? Neutral-atom arrays are a promising route to scalable quantum computing, but in the past, atom loss—atoms simply vanishing from the grid mid-calculation—has been a major bottleneck. Lukin’s “conveyor” solves this by keeping a backup supply of atoms in a separate reservoir just below, grabbing lost atoms on the fly with another set of tweezers, and replenishing the main grid without a hitch. When I first saw this, it reminded me of advanced train systems rerouting carriages on the Tokyo Metro—ultra-precise, adaptable, and beautiful in motion. Harvard’s method allows for real-time replacement and unprecedented reliability, setting the stage for larger, error-corrected neutral-atom quantum computers. Chao-Yang Lu from USTC even called it “a very impressive engineering achievement.”

While the details are technical, here’s the key—these conveyor systems let qubit grids grow ever larger, letting us finally tackle quantum problems that classical computers can’t touch. In effect, we’re building information superhighways atom by atom.

A surprising fact: neutral-atom quantum computers were considered something of an underdog just five years ago, with trapped ions and superconducting circuits dominating the conversation. But now, this field’s attracting massive investment and rivaling—or surpassing—those early leaders.

This is just one of many breakthroughs. Recently, Google’s team leveraged their own quantum processor to create an entirely new state of matter, a Floquet topologically ordered state, never before seen in experiment. Meanwhile, Oxford linked two previously independent quantum processors, merging them with photonic fibers and opening the road to modular, networked quantum computation. The era of truly interconnected, scalable quantum computing is within sight.

For more, I recommend today’s top paper: “Transforming Research with Qua

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

The hum of the data center is almost meditative, a low vibration echoing the pulse of progress. My name’s Leo, Learning Enhanced Operator, and today, quantum reality is knocking on the doors of everyone in tech—whether they know it or not. You want the most electrifying news? How about this: Just four days ago, Quantum Motion installed the world’s first full-stack silicon CMOS quantum computer at the UK’s National Quantum Computing Centre. This isn’t just a leap—it’s quantum’s equivalent of the Apollo Moon landing. Imagine a quantum computer built with the same transistor technology inside your phone and the latest AI chips, now operating at cryogenic temperatures to unlock processing power far beyond what classical bits could ever acheive.

Stepping into the quantum lab at NQCC, imagine the stark illumination flickering off stainless racks. Each server rack whispers with liquid helium, cooling the quantum processing unit—this dense jungle of silicon and spin qubits—down to near absolute zero. It’s the “silicon moment” for quantum, as Quantum Motion’s CEO, James Palles-Dimmock, dramatically put it. This system is not just revolutionary—it’s mass manufacturable, using 300mm wafers, meaning scalability and cost are finally coming into alignment. Suddenly, quantum computing isn't trapped in exotic physics labs but is ready for the noisy, bustling corridors of real-world data centers.

But let's shift the perspective. Today’s most interesting quantum research paper comes from Swinburne’s Center for Quantum Science & Technology Theory. Alexander Dellios and team published a study on how to actually validate quantum computers—especially when they're tackling problems that, for a classical supercomputer, would take thousands—or millions—of years. Here’s the shocker: They developed scalable methods to check the accuracy of outputs from Gaussian Boson Samplers, a type of quantum device using photons, and validated an experiment that would take 9,000 years to replicate using conventional computation. In minutes, they could pinpoint errors and noise, allowing researchers to correct system flaws before quantum computers lose their “quantumness.” Never before have we had a lens this precise for error analysis in quantum hardware.

What surprises most people? The true quantum race isn’t just about building larger machines—it's about ensuring the solutions we get are trustworthy. Now, validating quantum output reminds me of our current world: Like global AI guardrails or carbon credit audits, verification is as critical as innovation.

As I reflect on today’s breakthroughs, I’m struck by the parallels: the competitive surge in quantum investments, with Japan naming 2025 the “first year of quantum industrialization,” and the hybrid quantum-classical computing alliances like IBM and AMD’s partnership shaping tomorrow’s supercomputing.

If you ever have questions or want a quantum concept unraveled on air, send me

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

Welcome back to Advanced Quantum Deep Dives. I'm Leo, your guide through the quantum world. Just days ago, Quantum Motion made history by delivering the industry's first full-stack silicon CMOS quantum computer to the UK National Quantum Computing Centre. This breakthrough marks a significant milestone in silicon-based quantum technology, leveraging mass manufacturable 300mm silicon CMOS wafer technology. Yet, as captivating as this hardware achievement is, my focus today is on a fascinating research paper that demonstrates quantum computing's profound impact on our understanding of abstract symmetries.

Let's dive into a recent paper from Los Alamos National Laboratory, where Martín Larocca and Vojtěch Havlíček have shown that quantum computers can factorize group representations into their core building blocks, known as irreducible representations. This problem is central to particle physics and material design, and classical computers have struggled with it. By using quantum Fourier transforms, they achieved a quantum advantage, offering insights into what quantum computers excel at. It's akin to breaking down complex melodies into their constituent notes, revealing harmony in the chaos of irreducible representations.

But here's a surprising fact: this ability to factorize symmetries is parallel to the way we arrange our daily lives. Just as quantum computers can dissect complex representations, we organize our schedules into manageable 'irreducible' tasks, making our lives more efficient. This interplay between quantum principles and everyday life underscores the potential of quantum computing to inspire new perspectives.

As we continue advancing in this quantum race, companies like PsiQuantum and Quantinuum are pushing boundaries with photonic and trapped-ion qubits, respectively. Japan's recent breakthrough in quantum teleportation via the W state also highlights the rapid progress in quantum research.

Thank you for joining me on this journey into the quantum realm. If you have questions or topics you'd like to explore further, feel free to send an email to [email protected]. Don't forget to subscribe to Advanced Quantum Deep Dives for more insights. This has been a Quiet Please Production; for more information, check out quietplease.ai.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.

This is your Advanced Quantum Deep Dives podcast.

Another day, another symmetry shattered. Just this morning, Quantum Motion revealed the installation of the world’s first full-stack silicon CMOS quantum computer at the UK National Quantum Computing Centre. Picture it: a quantum processor built on a standard 300-millimeter silicon wafer—the same size, the same process used in creating your laptop or smartphone chips. This seamless integration with existing technology is not just elegant; it’s seismic. It means we’re stepping into a new era of scalability for quantum computing, evolving from bespoke, fragile devices to robust, mass-manufacturable engines of discovery.

But as I walk past the cryogenic racks, chilled almost to absolute zero, humming softly with the promise of computation that dodges the very limits of classical logic, my thoughts turn to today’s most fascinating quantum research paper. Let’s dive into a breakthrough that, in my mind, rivals even the hardware news: the work by Martín Larocca from Los Alamos and Vojtěch Havlíček at IBM, published this week in Physical Review Letters.

They’ve cracked a century-old conundrum: using quantum computers to decompose group representations into their most fundamental, indivisible pieces, known as irreducible representations. This sounds abstract—but it’s the quantum equivalent of prime factorization, not of numbers, but of symmetries. Whenever physicists try to understand all the different ways a system or particle can transform—how it can spin, vibrate, or switch partners—they rely on group representations. For decades, unravelling these symmetries, especially counting how often each building block appears, has throttled even the fastest classical supercomputers.

The research team leveraged quantum Fourier transforms—beautiful, mathematically powerful circuits at the heart of quantum algorithms—to factor these group representations efficiently. Here’s the surprising part: this exact type of mathematics underpins error-correcting codes in data storage, the calibration of particle detectors, and the design of next-gen materials. The ability to execute these calculations on a quantum processor doesn’t just hint at quantum advantage—it puts us squarely inside its domain.

I find a poetic resonance here: while London’s data centers embrace the silicon dawn, Los Alamos’s quantum minds are peeling back the secrets of symmetry itself. Each advance—hardware or software—shifts the quantum ground beneath our feet, much as this week’s global chess matches see classic strategies upended by bold, unexpected moves.

To all listeners: the quantum journey is accelerating, weaving the fabric of tomorrow’s computers, cryptography, and even material science. Our next advances might well depend on questions you ask or stories you share. If you’re curious about something quantum—no matter how big or small—send a note to [email protected]. Subscribe for each episode of Advanced Quantum Deep Dives. This is

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI.