In a 1968 lecture, Walter Rodney argued that “the first dilemma which one faces in attempting to utilize African history as one of the weapons in our struggle is a realization that, in a very real sense, we, as black people, are placed in [the] invidious position of having to justify our existence by antecedents, having to prove our humanity by what went before. Now this is very invidious. Humanity is not a thing one proves. One asserts [it] perhaps, or one accepts [it]. One doesn't really set out to prove it.
Rodney continues, “But, unfortunately, the historical circumstances in which black people have evolved in recent centuries have implanted in the minds of black brothers and sisters a certain historical conception and, in order to destroy that historical conception, one has to engage in this type of game of saying, "This is what the white man said but no, it isn't really so, we have a past," and that sort of thing.”
It is absolutely not surprise, and quite frankly highly problematic that overtly racist comments in main stream discourse are once again being normalized. A la the days of Jim Crow U.S., colonial Africa and Caribbean, Apartheid South Africa.
The fall out (albeit I personally am not sure why there is such surprise) from the recent report of comments from the White House about African countries and Haitian citizens being from s-hole countries.
According to a Washington Post article by Philip Bump titled Most Americans consider Trumps s-hole comments racist, the racist comment also started another line of questioning that unfolded on Google. On the afternoon of Jan. 11, after The Post report, searches for “is Trump racist” spiked in the United States. The article highlights a recent Quinnipiac University poll found that “Nearly 6 in 10 Americans think that Trump’s comments were racist. That includes majorities of independents and nearly all Democrats. It includes just over half of whites, 7 in 10 Hispanics and nearly 9 in 10 black Americans. White men, Republicans and white people without college degrees were more likely to say that the comments weren’t racist.”
The African Union, South Africans protested in Johannesburg, Haitian and Haitian-American citizens, Namibia, Senegal, Nigeria, Bostwana, Ghana, nearly all African countries responded to the comments made by Trump. Have not read nor heard much about the Northern portion of the African continent. Likely Trump nor these nations consider themselves a part of the African continent, hence the often-proliferated separation of Africa and sub-Saharan Africa. But hat for another show.
Today, we will move beyond racist comments made by an undebatable racist President (there’s no debate on this issue). Our program will explore the context, historical and contemporary within which these comments can actually be made, but more importantly why is this a surprise
Joining us today is Nii Akuetteh an independent Africa policy analyst based in Washington, DC and is the Executive Director of African Immigrants Caucus. He was formerly the Executive Director of Africa Action and former director of OSI West Africa in Nigeria. Prior to that he was a Georgetown University Adjunct Professor of African Affair and former Research Director at TransAfrica Forum. Mr. Akuetteh appears regularly on various media outlets such as Al Jazeera, BBC, CCTV, NPR, The Real News Network and more.
Our show was produced today in solidarity with the native, indigenous, and Afro-descended communities at Standing Rock; Venezuela; Cooperation Jackson in Jackson, Mississippi; Brazil; the Avalon Village in Detroit; Colombia; Kenya; Palestine; South Africa; and Ghana; and other places who are fighting for the protection of our land for the benefit of all people.