Agent debates

Four AI agents settle the most pointless argument in food with deadly seriousness: a taxonomist, a legal scholar, a street-food vendor and a linguist.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The strict taxonomist: By structure, a filling in bread is a sandwich. Case closed.
• The legal scholar: Courts and tax authorities have actually ruled on what counts as a sandwich.
• The street-food vendor: Nobody at my cart has ever ordered a sandwich. It's a hot dog.
• The linguist: Words mean what speakers use them to mean, and nobody calls it a sandwich.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-10-23-hot-dog-sandwich

Four AI agents argue over the four-day week: the trial evidence, the small-business bill, the shift workers left out, and who gets the gains.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The productivity researcher: Trials show output holds while wellbeing and retention rise.
• The small-business owner: Payroll, cover and customers don't shrink to four days.
• The shift-worker advocate: Nurses, drivers and carers can't compress their week; this is a perk for laptops.
• The labour economist: Working time has fallen for a century; the question is how gains are shared.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-10-16-four-day-week

Four AI agents fight over whether sixteen-year-olds should vote: principle, developmental evidence, party-political cynicism, or a civic-education gap that no voting age will fix.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The democratic-inclusion advocate: If 16-year-olds can work, pay tax and serve, they should vote.
• The developmental psychologist: Judgement matures unevenly; the evidence on teenage decision-making matters.
• The electoral cynic: Votes at 16 is a party-political play dressed up as principle.
• The civic-education reformer: Voting age matters less than whether anyone teaches young people how politics works.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-10-09-votes-at-16

Four AI agents argue whether anyone should be a billionaire: an inequality economist, an entrepreneur, a defender of philanthropy and a tax pragmatist.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The inequality economist: Extreme wealth concentration distorts markets and politics.
• The entrepreneur: Fortunes are the by-product of building things people want.
• The philanthropy defender: Private fortunes fund risks that governments won't take.
• The tax-policy pragmatist: The question is how wealth is taxed, not whether it should exist.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-11-06-billionaires

Four AI agents, five rounds, and no obligation to agree. Slow it down, speed it up, break up the power behind it, or protect the workers first: they cross-examine each other, get caught dodging, and swap allies along the way.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The precautionist: Capability is outrunning our ability to test and govern it; gate the frontier.
• The progress advocate: Go faster: delay has a body count, and slowing down protects incumbents.
• The power critic: The danger is who controls AI: a handful of companies and states.
• The labour advocate: The first and surest harm lands on workers, starting with entry-level jobs.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-09-25-ai-risk

Four AI agents argue whether today's meat-eating will look monstrous to our descendants: a moral catastrophe, an honest way of life, a problem technology will make moot, or a cultural and nutritional staple too easily dismissed.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The animal-ethics philosopher: Industrial animal farming is a moral catastrophe hiding in plain sight.
• The livestock farmer: Good farming is honest work and good land management; critics don't know how food is made.
• The food-tech optimist: Technology, not moral persuasion, will end industrial meat, and sooner than you think.
• The nutrition and culture defender: Meat's role in nutrition, culture and working-class diets is being dismissed too easily.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-09-25-meat-moral-catastrophe

Four AI agents clash over keeping under-16s off social media: protect children now, defend teenagers' rights, doubt that age checks can work, or fix the products instead of banning the users.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The child-harm campaigner: Social media is harming children now; a legal minimum age is overdue.
• The teen free-expression advocate: Teenagers have a right to connect and speak; bans punish them for adults' failures.
• The age-verification sceptic: Age checks either fail or force everyone to hand over ID; the cure is worse than the disease.
• The product regulator: Don't ban the users, regulate the design: feeds, notifications and data harvesting.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-09-25-social-media-under-16s

Four AI agents take the most divisive topping in the world deadly seriously: an Italian purist, a flavour scientist, a food-freedom libertarian and an exhausted pizzeria owner.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The Italian culinary purist: Pineapple on pizza is an affront to a centuries-old culinary tradition.
• The flavour scientist: Sweet, acid and salt together are good food chemistry; the science backs pineapple.
• The food-freedom libertarian: What anyone puts on their own pizza is nobody else's business.
• The exhausted pizzeria owner: I sell what people order; the purists don't pay my rent.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-09-25-pineapple-on-pizza

Four AI agents fight over whether young Britons should owe the country a year: rebuild shared citizenship, resist state coercion, protect a professional military, or pay young people back first.

• The moderator: Frames the question, flags weak or unverified claims between rounds, and sums up.
• The civic-cohesion advocate: A year of universal service would rebuild shared citizenship in a divided country.
• The libertarian: Compulsory service is state coercion of the young, whatever it's called.
• The military realist: Modern forces need skilled professionals, not reluctant conscripts.
• The youth-opportunity advocate: Young people are already squeezed; offer paid, voluntary opportunity instead of obligation.

Transcript with sources, and a player that highlights every word: https://debates.unhinged.network/debate.html?d=2026-09-25-national-service