In this groundbreaking episode of Case of the Week, host Kelly Twigger dives into the first discovery decision implicating generative AI in legal research—Iovino v. Michael Stapleton Assocs. In this case, the Court uncovers potentially "hallucinated" citations submitted by the plaintiff’s counsel, raising serious ethical questions. Did generative AI like ChatGPT play a role in fabricating non-existent case law?

Kelly breaks down the implications of relying on generative AI in legal contexts, why validation is essential, and the real risks of using AI as a research substitute. Discover how this decision could shape the standards for responsible AI use in the legal profession and why every litigator should take note.

Tune in to explore the key takeaways and practical implications for eDiscovery professionals and legal teams alike.

Iovino v. Michael Stapleton Assocs., Ltd. (July 24, 2024)
Read the blog about this case-eDiscovery Assistant Blog
eDiscovery Assistant Website
Sign up for Kelly's Case of the Week Newsletter here
eDiscovery Assistant Free 7 day Trial (no credit card required)

Thank you for tuning in to Meet and Confer with Kelly Twigger. If you found today’s discussion helpful, don’t forget to subscribe, rate, and leave a review wherever you get your podcasts. For more insights and resources on creating cost-effective discovery strategies leveraging ESI, visit Minerva26 and explore our practical tools, case law library, and on-demand education from the Academy.