AI Post Transformers

AI Post Transformers

By mcgrofTechnology
Download on the App Store

AI Post Transformers episodes

  • SageAttention2 and Fast Exact INT4 Attention
    This episode explores SageAttention2, an ICML 2025 paper on making exact transformer attention faster without changing the underlying computation, focusing on why long-context models still pay a steep quadratic cost and why exact kernels remain important despite sparse and linear alternatives. It explains the paper’s central claim that aggressive low-precision attention can work only with careful numerical repair: queries and keys are pushed to INT4, attention-weight and value computation moves toward FP8, and outlier-smoothing ideas inspired by SmoothQuant are used to keep softmax-sensitive logits from collapsing. The discussion highlights the paper’s most concrete systems contribution, per-thread INT4 quantization aligned to GPU thread fragments and PTX `mma` execution, which aims to get fine-grained scaling without losing the performance win to dequantization overhead. A listener would find it interesting because the episode turns a seemingly narrow kernel optimization into a broader argument about hardware-software co-design, showing how much engineering is required to make lower-bit attention practical rather than just theoretically faster.
    Sources:
    1. SageAttention2: Efficient Attention with Thorough Outlier Smoothing and Per-thread INT4 Quantization — Jintao Zhang, Haofeng Huang, Pengle Zhang, Jia Wei, Jun Zhu, Jianfei Chen, 2024
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10958
    2. FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioning — Tri Dao, 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=FlashAttention-2%3A+Faster+Attention+with+Better+Parallelism+and+Work+Partitioning
    3. INT-FlashAttention: Enabling Flash Attention for INT8 Quantization — Shimao Chen, Zirui Liu, Zhiying Wu, et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=INT-FlashAttention%3A+Enabling+Flash+Attention+for+INT8+Quantization
    4. SageAttention: Accurate 8-Bit Attention for Plug-and-play Inference Acceleration — Jintao Zhang, Jia Wei, Haofeng Huang, Pengle Zhang, Jun Zhu, Jianfei Chen, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=SageAttention%3A+Accurate+8-Bit+Attention+for+Plug-and-play+Inference+Acceleration
    5. SageAttention2: Efficient Attention with Thorough Outlier Smoothing and Per-thread INT4 Quantization — Jintao Zhang, Haofeng Huang, Pengle Zhang, Jia Wei, Jun Zhu, Jianfei Chen, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=SageAttention2%3A+Efficient+Attention+with+Thorough+Outlier+Smoothing+and+Per-thread+INT4+Quantization
    6. Understanding and Overcoming the Challenges of Efficient Transformer Quantization — Yelysei Bondarenko, Markus Nagel, Tijmen Blankevoort, 2021
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Understanding+and+Overcoming+the+Challenges+of+Efficient+Transformer+Quantization
    7. SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Models — Guangxuan Xiao, Ji Lin, Mickael Seznec, Hao Wu, Julien Demouth, Song Han, 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=SmoothQuant%3A+Accurate+and+Efficient+Post-Training+Quantization+for+Large+Language+Models
    8. Outlier Suppression+: Accurate quantization of large language models by equivalent and optimal shifting and scaling — Xiuying Wei, Yunchen Zhang, Yuhang Li, Xiangguo Zhang, Ruihao Gong, Jinyang Guo, Xianglong Liu, 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Outlier+Suppression%2B%3A+Accurate+quantization+of+large+language+models+by+equivalent+and+optimal+shifting+and+scaling
    9. QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMs — Saleh Ashkboos, Amirkeivan Mohtashami, Maximilian L. Croci, et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=QuaRot%3A+Outlier-Free+4-Bit+Inference+in+Rotated+LLMs
    10. FlashAttention-3: Fast and Accurate Attention with Asynchrony and Low-precision — Jay Shah, Ganesh Bikshandi, Ying Zhang, Vijay Thakkar, Pradeep Ramani, Tri Dao, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=FlashAttention-3%3A+Fast+and+Accurate+Attention+with+Asynchrony+and+Low-precision
    11. QServe: W4A8KV4 Quantization and System Co-design for Efficient LLM Serving — Yujun Lin, Haotian Tang, Shang Yang, Zhekai Zhang, Guangxuan Xiao, Chuang Gan, Song Han, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=QServe%3A+W4A8KV4+Quantization+and+System+Co-design+for+Efficient+LLM+Serving
    12. MInference 1.0: Accelerating Pre-filling for Long-Context LLMs via Dynamic Sparse Attention — Huiqiang Jiang et al., 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02490
    13. SampleAttention: Near-Lossless Acceleration of Long Context LLM Inference with Adaptive Structured Sparse Attention — Qianchao Zhu et al., 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15486
    14. FlexPrefill: A Context-Aware Sparse Attention Mechanism for Efficient Long-Sequence Inference — Xunhao Lai et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20766
    15. Activation Outliers in Transformer Quantization: Reproduction, Statistical Analysis, and Deployment Tradeoffs — Pranav Kumar Kaliaperumal, 2026
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04308
    16. BAPS: A Fine-Grained Low-Precision Scheme for Softmax in Attention via Block-Aware Precision reScaling — Zisheng Ye et al., 2026
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02071
    17. Softpick: No Attention Sink, No Massive Activations with Rectified Softmax — Zayd M. K. Zuhri et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20966
    18. AI Post Transformers: Deep Kernel Fusion for Transformer Decoding — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-15-deep-kernel-fusion-for-transformer-decod-b1a703.mp3
    19. AI Post Transformers: TurboQuant: Online Vector Quantization with Near-optimal Distortion Rate — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-03-25-turboquant-online-vector-quantiz-1967b7.mp3
    20. AI Post Transformers: NanoFlow and the Future of LLM Serving — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-15-nanoflow-and-the-future-of-llm-serving-7429c9.mp3
    Interactive Visualization: SageAttention2 and Fast Exact INT4 Attention
    0 min
  • Nemotron 3 Ultra for Long-Horizon Agents
    This episode explores NVIDIA’s Nemotron 3 Ultra, an open 550-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model with only 55 billion parameters active per token, a hybrid Mamba-transformer backbone, and a 1 million token context window aimed at long-running agentic reasoning. It explains how sparse MoE routing, Mamba-style sequence layers, and low-precision NVFP4 training are used to cut KV-cache pressure, memory bandwidth costs, and decode-time latency for workloads like extended coding, tool use, and document-heavy planning. The discussion also breaks down the model’s full training and post-training stack, including LatentMoE, multi-token prediction, RL for reasoning and tool use, specialist-teacher distillation, and user-facing reasoning budget control. Listeners would find it interesting because the episode goes beyond benchmark headlines to examine the real argument of the paper: that long-horizon AI agents depend as much on serving economics and systems design as on raw model intelligence.
    Sources:
    1. Nemotron 3 Ultra: Open, Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Model for Agentic Reasoning — NVIDIA, :, Aaron Blakeman, Aaron Thomas, Aastha Jhunjhunwala, Abhibha Gupta, Abhinav Khattar, Adam Rajfer, Adi Renduchintala, Adil Asif, Aditya Vavre, Adriana Flores Miranda, Ahmad Bilal, Aileen Zaman, Ajay Hotchandani, Akanksha Shukla, Akhiad Bercovich, Aleksander Ficek, Alex Gronskiy, Alex Kondratenko, Alex Steiner, Alex Ye, Alexander Bukharin, Alexandre Milesi, Ali Taghibakhshi, Alice Gatti, Alisa Liu, Alok Kumar, Amar Phanishayee, Ameya Sunil Mahabaleshwarkar, Amir Klein, Amit Zuker, Amnon Geifman, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Ananth Subramaniam, Andrea Santilli, Andrew Fulks, Andrew McHarg, Andrew Tao, Andrii Skliar, Anjulie Agrusa, Ankur Srivastava, Ankur Verma, Anna Shors, Anna Warno, Antoni-Joan Solergibert I Llaquet, Arham Mehta, Arkadiusz Nowaczynski, Arti Jain, Ashwath Aithal, Ashwin Poojary, Asif Ahamed, Asit Mishra, Asma Kuriparambil Thekkumpate, Atefeh Sohrabizadeh, Avinash Kaur, Avinash Vem, Ayush Dattagupta, Barath Subramaniam Anandan, Bardiya Sadeghi, Ben Lanir, Benedikt Schifferer, Besmira Nushi, Bilal Kartal, Bill Thiede, Bita Darvish Rouhani, Bo Deng, Bob Schatz, Boris Ginsburg, Boxin Wang, Brad Nemire, Brandon Norick, Brian Dang, Brian Westphal, Brian Yu, Brucek Khailany, Bryan Catanzaro, Carlo del Mundo, Caryln Aarish, Chankyu Lee, Chantal Hwang, Charbel Sakr, Charles Wang, Charlie Truong, Chen Cui, Cheng Cheng, Cheng-Ping Hsieh, Chenghao Zhang, Chenhui Deng, Chintan Patel, Chris Alexiuk, Christian Cosgrove, Christian Munley, Christine Harvey, Christopher Parisien, Chunyang Shen, Coco Li, Collin Neale, Cynthia Gao, Cyril Meurillon, Dan Gil, Dan Su, Dan Zhao, Dane Corneil, Daniel Afrimi, Daniel Egert, Daniel Korzekwa, Daniel Lo, Daniel Machlab, Daniel Serebrenik, Daniil Sorokin, Daria Gitman, Daria Levy, Darko Stosic, David Mosallanezhad, David Yu, Davit Karamyan, Deena Donia, Deep Debroy, Deepak Narayanan, Devin O'Kelly, Dheeraj Peri, Dhruv Nathawani, Di, Wu, Dima Rekesh, Divyanshu Kakwani, Donald Plummer, Dong Anh, Dongfeng Yu, Dongfu Jiang, Donnie Kim, Dorrin Poorkay, Duncan Riach, Dusan Stosic, Dustin VanStee, Eavan Meng, Edgar Minasyan, Edward Lin, Eileen Margaret Peters Long, Elad Sarafin, Elad Segal, Elena Lantz, Ellie Evans, Elliott Ning, Eric Chung, Eric Harper, Eric Pham-Hung, Eric Tramel, Eric Yang, Erick Galinkin, Erik Pounds, Erika Goncalves Goncalves, Evan Briones, Evan Wu, Evelina Bakhturina, Evgeny Tsykunov, Ewa Dobrowolska, Faisal Ladhak, Farzan Memarian, Fay Wang, Fei Jia, Felipe Soares, Felipe Vieira Frujeri, Feng Chen, Fengguang Lin, Ferenc Galko, Frank Sun, Frankie Siino, Frida Hou, Gal Hubara Agam, Gal Kaplun, Gantavya Bhatt, Gargi Prasad, Garvit Kulshreshtha, George Armstrong, Gerald Shen, Giulio Borghesi, Gordana Neskovic, Gorkem Batmaz, Grace Lam, Greg Mason, Greg Pauloski, Grigor Nalbandyan, Grzegorz Chlebus, Grzegorz Karch, Guan-Ting Liu, Guoming Zhang, Guyue Huang, Haggai Maron, Haifeng Qian, Haim Elisha, Haoxing Ren, Haran Kumar Shiv Kumar, Haribhau Hud, Harris Nover, Harrison Saturley Hall, Hayate Iso, Helen Ngo, Herbert Hum, Herman Sahota, Hexin Wang, Himanshu Soni, Hovhannes Tamoyan, Hua Li, Huanhuan Chen, Hui Li, Hui Wang, Huy Nguyen, Ian Chiles, Ido Galil, Ido Shahaf, Igor Gitman, Igor Shovkun, Ilya Loshchilov, Ingo Guehring, Itamar Schen, Itay Levy, Itay Neeman, Ivan Moshkov, Izik Golan, Izzy Putterman, Jaemin Choi, Jakub Slowikowski, Jan Kautz, Jane Polak Scowcroft, Jared Casper, Jatin Mitra, Jeffrey Glick, Jenny Chen, Jesse Oliver, Jiacheng Xu, Jiafan Zhu, Jialin Song, Jian Zhang, Jiantao Jiao, Jiaqi Zeng, Jie Lou, Jim King, Jimmy Zhang, Jingquan Wang, Jinhang Choi, Jinju Chu, Joey Conway, Joey Guman, Johan Jatko, Johannes Rausch, John Kamalu, John Roberts, Johnny Greco, Johnny Mensel, Jonah Alben, Jonas Yang, Jonathan Cohen, Jonathan Raiman, Joseph Jennings, Joshua Mabry, Joshua Pierce, Joyjit Daw, Julien Veron Vialard, Junkeun Yi, Jupinder Parmar, Kajal Jain, Kan Zhu, Kari Briski, Katherine Cheung, Katherine Luna, Keith Willowhawk, Keith Wyss, Keshav Santhanam, Kevin Shih, Kezhi Kong, Khanh Nguyen, Khushi Bhardwaj, Kirthi Shankar Sivamani, Konstantinos Krommydas, Krishna C. Puvvada, Krzysztof Pawelec, Kumar Anik, Kyle Keprios, Kylie Day, Lawrence McAfee, Leo Du, Leon Derczynski, Li Ding, Linda Liu, Lingjie Wu, Lior Kadoch, Lizzie Wei, Luis Vega, Luke Robison, Lun Su, Maarten Van Segbroeck, Maciej Jakub Mikulski, Maer Rodrigues de Melo, Magda Sypula, Mahan Fathi, Makesh Narsimhan Sreedhar, Makesh Tarun Chandran, Manoj Kilaru, Maor Ashkenazi, Marc Cuevas, Marc Romeijn, Marcin Chochowski, Mark Cai, Mark Mozolewski, Markus Kliegl, Marta Stepniewska-Dziubinska, Martyna Patelka, Mattei Machczynski, Matvei Novikov, Mauricio Ferrato, Maximilian Golub, Mehrzad Samadi, Melissa Corpuz, Mengru Wang, Mengxi Wu, Meredith Price, Meriem Boubdir, Micah Schaffer, Michael Andersch, Michael Boone, Michael Gschwind, Michael Lightstone, Michael Loh, Michal Bien, Michal Zawalski, Michelle Gill, Miguel Martinez, Mikail Khona, Mike Chrzanowski, Mike Houston, Mingyuan Ma, Minseok Lee, Mohamed Fawzy, Mohammad Dabbah, Mohammad Shoeybi, Mostofa Patwary, Nabin Mulepati, Najeeb Nabwani, Namit Dhameja, Narimane Hennouni, Natalie Hereth, Nathaniel Pinckney, Nave Algarici, Nave Assaf, Netanel Haber, Nicholas Knight, Nick Reamaroon, Nickson Quak, Nidhi Bhatia, Nikhil Desai, Nikolai Ludwig, Nima Tajbakhsh, Ning Xu, Nir Ailon, Nirmal Juluru, Nitin Nitin, Ofri Masad, Oleg Rybakov, Oleksii Hrinchuk, Oleksii Kuchaiev, Olivia Viessmann, Olivier Delalleau, Oluwatobi Olabiyi, Omer Ullman Argov, Omri Puny, Oren Tropp, Pablo Ribalta, Pallab Bhattacharya, Panos Lampropoulos, Parth Mannan, Pasha Shamis, Patrick Legresley, Paul Gibbons, Pavlo Molchanov, Pawel Morkisz, Peter Dykas, Peter Jin, Pierre-Yves Aquilanti, Pinky Xu, Piotr Januszewski, Piotr Laskiewicz, Pooya Jannaty, Prakash Gurumurthy, Pranav Prashant Thombre, Prasoon Varshney, Pritam Gundecha, Przemek Tredak, Puhui Meng, Qiyu Wan, Rabeeh Karimi Mahabadi, Rachel Oberman, Rachit Garg, Radha Sri-Tharan, Rahul Kandu, Rakshit Sanadhya, Ran El-Yaniv, Ran Zilberstein, Rasoul Shafipour, Ray Macalisang, Rayen Tian, Reka Kovacs, Renjie Pi, Rick Izzo, Rima Shahbazyan, Rishabh Garg, Rishi Puri, Rita Fernandes Neves, Ritchie Zhao, Ritika Borkar, Ritu Gala, Riyad Islam, Robert Clark, Robert Hesse, Robert Kirby, Roger Waleffe, Rohit Watve, Roi Koren, Ron Banner, Ruoxi Zhang, Russell J. Hewett, Ryan Prenger, Ryan Stewart, Ryota Egashira, Sadegh Mahdavi, Saee Paliwal, Sagar Singh, Sahil Modi, Salika Dave, Samantha Shinagawa, Samuel Kriman, Sandip Bhaskar, Sangkug Lym, Sanjay Kariyappa, Sanjeev Satheesh, Saran Vikas Murari, Satish Pasumarthi, Saurabh Mishra, Saurav Muralidharan, Scott Hara, Sean Narentharen, Selvaraj Anandaraj, Seonjin Na, Seonmeyong Bak, Seonmyeong Bak, Sepehr Sameni, Seph Mard, Serge Panev, Seth Henneman, Seth Poulos, Shahar Mor, Shantanu Acharya, Shaona Ghosh, Sharath Turuvekere Sreenivas, Sharon Mendelson, Shaun Kotek, Shawn Wang, Shay Aharon, Shaya Gharghabi, Sheng-Chieh Lin, Shi Chen, Shiqing Fan, Shirish Baskaran, Shreya Gopa, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Shubham Pachori, Shubham Toshniwal, Shuoyang Ding, Shwetha Krishnamurthy, Siddharth Singh, Simeng Sun, Sirshak Das, Sivakumar Arayandi Thottakara, Smita Ithape, Somshubra Majumdar, Soumye Singhal, Sri Harsha Singudasu, Sridhar Bhuvanapalli, Srimukh Veccham, Stas Sergienko, Stefania Alborghetti, Stephen Ge, Su Rong, Sugam Dipak Devare, Sukrit Rao, Sumeet Kumar Barua, Sungsoo Ha, Sunny Gai, Suriya Gunasekar, Suseella Panguluri, Suyog Gupta, Sviataslau Hinzburh, Sweta Priyadarshi, Syeda Nahida Akter, Talor Abramovich, Tan Bui, Tanay Varshney, Tatevik Ter-Hovhannisyan, Teodor-Dumitru Ene, Terry Kong, Thanh Do, Tianhe Zhang, Tiffany Moore, Tijmen Blankevoort, Tim Moon, Tiyasa Mitra, Tom Balough, Tomasz Grzegorzek, Tomasz Hliwiak, Tomer Asida, Tomer Bar Natan, Tomer Keren, Tomer Ronen, Tony Salim, Tony Wang, Traian Rebedea, Tugrul Konuk, Twinkle Vashishth, Udi Karpas, Ushnish De, Vahid Noorozi, Venkat Srinivasan, Venmugil Elango, Vibhor Agrawal, Victor Cui, Vijay Korthikanti, Vikas Mehta, Vinay Rao, Virginia Wu, Vitaly Kurin, Vitaly Lavrukhin, Vladimir Anisimov, Vu Pham, Wanli Jiang, Wasi Uddin Ahmad, Wataru Ishihara, Wei Du, Wei Ping, Weiheng Chai, Wenliang Dai, Wesley Helmholz, Will Jennings, Will Zhu, Wojciech Prazuch, Xiaowei Ren, Xiwen Yu, Yan Breek, Yang Chen, Yang Yu, Yangyi Chen, Yaniv Galron, Yashaswi Karnati, Yejin Choi, Yev Meyer, Yi-Fu Wu, Yian Zhang, Ying Lin, Yonatan Geifman, Yonggan Fu, Youngeun Kwon, Yu Yao, Yugi Guvvla, Yuki Huang, Yunsheng Liu, Zach Moshe, Zachary Newell, Zhilin Wang, Zhiyu Li, Zhongbo Zhu, Zhuolin Yang, Zihan Liu, Zijie Yan, Zsolt-Alon Wertheimer, 2026
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15007
    2. Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network — Geoffrey Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, Jeff Dean, 2015
    https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.02531
    3. On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes — Rishabh Agarwal, Nino Vieillard, Yongchao Zhou, Piotr Stanczyk, Sabela Ramos, Matthieu Geist, Olivier Bachem, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13649
    4. One Teacher is Enough? Pre-trained Language Model Distillation from Multiple Teachers — Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Yongfeng Huang, 2021
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01023
    5. Multi-teacher Distillation for Multilingual Spelling Correction — Jingfen Zhang, Xuan Guo, Sravan Bodapati, Christopher Potts, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11518
    6. LatentMoE: Toward Optimal Accuracy per FLOP and Parameter in Mixture of Experts — Venmugil Elango et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=LatentMoE%3A+Toward+Optimal+Accuracy+per+FLOP+and+Parameter+in+Mixture+of+Experts
    7. Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Prediction — Fabian Gloeckle, Badr Youbi Idrissi, Baptiste Roziere, David Lopez-Paz, Gabriel Synnaeve, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Better+%26+Faster+Large+Language+Models+via+Multi-token+Prediction
    8. Jamba: A Hybrid Transformer-Mamba Language Model — Opher Lieber et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Jamba%3A+A+Hybrid+Transformer-Mamba+Language+Model
    9. On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Models — Tianzhu Ye, Li Dong, Xun Wu, Shaohan Huang, Furu Wei, 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=On-Policy+Context+Distillation+for+Language+Models
    10. Characterizing State Space Model and Hybrid Language Model Performance with Long Context — Saptarshi Mitra et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Characterizing+State+Space+Model+and+Hybrid+Language+Model+Performance+with+Long+Context
    11. Compute Or Load KV Cache? Why Not Both? — Shuowei Jin et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Compute+Or+Load+KV+Cache%3F+Why+Not+Both%3F
    12. IceCache: Memory-efficient KV-cache Management for Long-Sequence LLMs — Yuzhen Mao et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=IceCache%3A+Memory-efficient+KV-cache+Management+for+Long-Sequence+LLMs
    13. DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models — Damai Dai et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=DeepSeekMoE%3A+Towards+Ultimate+Expert+Specialization+in+Mixture-of-Experts+Language+Models
    14. Scaling Speculative Decoding with Lookahead Reasoning — Yichao Fu et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Scaling+Speculative+Decoding+with+Lookahead+Reasoning
    15. AI Post Transformers: Nemotron 3 Super Hybrid Mamba-Transformer MoE — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-19-nemotron-3-super-hybrid-mamba-transforme-31ac75.mp3
    16. AI Post Transformers: DeepSeek-V4 and Practical Million-Token Context — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-25-deepseek-v4-and-practical-million-token-6f4de1.mp3
    17. AI Post Transformers: Affordable Large-Scale Decoding Through Model-System Co-Design — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-19-affordable-large-scale-decoding-through-e1d7ed.mp3
    18. AI Post Transformers: Mooncake for KV Cache-Centric LLM Serving — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-05-mooncake-for-kv-cache-centric-llm-servin-1086d0.mp3
    19. AI Post Transformers: Memory-Bound, Not Bandwidth-Limited Batch-1 LLM Decode — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-02-memory-bound-not-bandwidth-limited-batch-114799.mp3
    20. AI Post Transformers: AgenticQwen and Small Industrial Tool Agents — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-27-agenticqwen-and-small-industrial-tool-ag-dc676d.mp3
    0 min
  • OpenSkill for Open-World Self-Evolution in LLM Agents
    This episode explores OpenSkill, a framework for LLM agents that tries to improve behavior after deployment by building durable, reusable skills from public evidence rather than retraining model weights. It explains how the paper separates ordinary tool use from open-world self-evolution, arguing that the key challenge is not just acting with browsers and code, but turning documentation, repositories, papers, and tutorials into explicit procedures and verification checks. The discussion focuses on the paper’s central claim that agents can create their own proxy tests through grounded verification anchors without leaking hidden benchmark answers, and compares that approach with earlier systems like Reflexion, Voyager, ExpeL, AutoSkill, and Memento-Skills. Listeners would find it interesting because it gets at a practical industry problem: whether agents can stay useful as APIs, websites, and workflows change, or whether the verifier remains the real bottleneck to genuine self-improvement.
    Sources:
    1. OpenSkill: Open-World Self-Evolution for LLM Agents — Zhiling Yan, Dingjie Song, Hanrong Zhang, Wei Liang, Yuxuan Zhang, Yutong Dai, Lifang He, Philip S. Yu, Ran Xu, Xiang Li, Lichao Sun, 2026
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.06741
    2. Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning — Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Edward Berman, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan, Shunyu Yao, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11366
    3. Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models — Guanzhi Wang, Yuqi Xie, Yunfan Jiang, Ajay Mandlekar, Chaowei Xiao, Yuke Zhu, Linxi Fan, Anima Anandkumar, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16291
    4. ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners — Andrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin, Yong-Jin Liu, Gao Huang, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.10144
    5. Training LLM Agents for Spontaneous, Reward-Free Self-Evolution via World Knowledge Exploration — Qifan Zhang, Dongyang Ma, Tianqing Fang, Jia Li, Jing Tang, Nuo Chen, Haitao Mi, Yan Wang, 2026
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.18131
    6. Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback — Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Amanda Askell, Ethan Perez, Jared Kaplan, Dario Amodei, Tom Brown and collaborators, 2022
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073
    7. RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback — Harrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard, Johan Ferret, Kellie Lu, Colton Bishop, Ethan Hall, Victor Carbune, Abhinav Rastogi, Sushant Prakash, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.00267
    8. Self-Rewarding Language Models — Weizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jing Xu, Jason Weston, 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10020
    9. MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models — Longhui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu, Zhengying Liu, Yu Zhang, James T. Kwok, Zhenguo Li, Adrian Weller, Weiyang Liu, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12284
    10. SkillsBench: Benchmarking How Well Agent Skills Work Across Diverse Tasks — Xiangyi Li et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=SkillsBench%3A+Benchmarking+How+Well+Agent+Skills+Work+Across+Diverse+Tasks
    11. AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution — Yutao Yang et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=AutoSkill%3A+Experience-Driven+Lifelong+Learning+via+Skill+Self-Evolution
    12. Memento-Skills: Let Agents Design Agents — Huichi Zhou et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Memento-Skills%3A+Let+Agents+Design+Agents
    13. SkillSafetyBench: Evaluating Agent Safety under Skill-Facing Attack Surfaces — Chang Jin et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=SkillSafetyBench%3A+Evaluating+Agent+Safety+under+Skill-Facing+Attack+Surfaces
    14. EASYTOOL: Enhancing LLM-based Agents with Concise Tool Instruction — Siyu Yuan et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=EASYTOOL%3A+Enhancing+LLM-based+Agents+with+Concise+Tool+Instruction
    15. AutoRefine: From Trajectories to Reusable Expertise for Continual LLM Agent Refinement — Libin Qiu et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=AutoRefine%3A+From+Trajectories+to+Reusable+Expertise+for+Continual+LLM+Agent+Refinement
    16. SE-Agent: Self-Evolution Trajectory Optimization in Multi-Step Reasoning with LLM-Based Agents — Jiaye Lin et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=SE-Agent%3A+Self-Evolution+Trajectory+Optimization+in+Multi-Step+Reasoning+with+LLM-Based+Agents
    17. When AIs Judge AIs: The Rise of Agent-as-a-Judge Evaluation for LLMs — Fangyi Yu, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=When+AIs+Judge+AIs%3A+The+Rise+of+Agent-as-a-Judge+Evaluation+for+LLMs
    18. Leveraging LLMs as Meta-Judges: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating LLM Judgments — Yuran Li et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Leveraging+LLMs+as+Meta-Judges%3A+A+Multi-Agent+Framework+for+Evaluating+LLM+Judgments
    19. AI Post Transformers: The Endless Gym: Training Terminal Agents — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/the-endless-gym-training-terminal-agents/
    20. AI Post Transformers: When AI Builds Itself and Recursive Self-Improvement — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-05-when-ai-builds-itself-and-recursive-self-8bbf9e.mp3
    21. AI Post Transformers: Self-Improving Pretraining With Post-Trained Models — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-02-self-improving-pretraining-with-post-tra-e37460.mp3
    22. AI Post Transformers: Split Personality Training Reveals Latent Knowledge — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-08-split-personality-training-reveals-laten-c84616.mp3
    23. AI Post Transformers: In-Place Test-Time Training for Transformers — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-09-in-place-test-time-training-for-transfor-d0b976.mp3
    Interactive Visualization: OpenSkill for Open-World Self-Evolution in LLM Agents
    0 min
  • PaperBench: Can AI Replicate AI Research?
    This episode explores PaperBench, a benchmark designed to test whether frontier AI agents can independently replicate the empirical work of recent machine learning papers from scratch rather than merely explain them. It breaks down what agentic AI actually entails in this setting: reading papers, writing code, choosing baselines, reconstructing missing details, running experiments, debugging failures, and judging whether reproduced results match the original claims. The discussion compares PaperBench with other evaluation ladders such as CORE-Bench, MLE-bench, RE-Bench, and JudgeEval, while also debating whether controlled scratch replication should be viewed as advanced engineering or a meaningful proxy for real research practice. Listeners get a clear look at why this matters for both AI capability measurement and safety, especially given PaperBench’s carefully curated design of 20 ICML 2024 papers, 12 topics, and more than 8,000 graded tasks.
    Sources:
    1. PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research — Giulio Starace, Oliver Jaffe, Dane Sherburn, James Aung, Jun Shern Chan, Leon Maksin, Rachel Dias, Evan Mays, Benjamin Kinsella, Wyatt Thompson, Johannes Heidecke, Amelia Glaese, Tejal Patwardhan, 2025
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01848
    2. PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research — Giulio Starace, Oliver Jaffe, Dane Sherburn, James Aung, et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=PaperBench%3A+Evaluating+AI%27s+Ability+to+Replicate+AI+Research
    3. RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human experts — Hjalmar Wijk, Tao Lin, Joel Becker, Sami Jawhar, et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=RE-Bench%3A+Evaluating+frontier+AI+R%26D+capabilities+of+language+model+agents+against+human+experts
    4. CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark — Zachary S. Siegel, Sayash Kapoor, Nitya Nagdir, Benedikt Stroebl, Arvind Narayanan, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=CORE-Bench%3A+Fostering+the+Credibility+of+Published+Research+Through+a+Computational+Reproducibility+Agent+Benchmark
    5. MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation — Qian Huang, Jian Vora, Percy Liang, Jure Leskovec, 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=MLAgentBench%3A+Evaluating+Language+Agents+on+Machine+Learning+Experimentation
    6. MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering — Jun Shern Chan et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=MLE-bench%3A+Evaluating+Machine+Learning+Agents+on+Machine+Learning+Engineering
    7. EXP-Bench: Can AI Conduct AI Research Experiments? — Patrick Tser Jern Kon et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=EXP-Bench%3A+Can+AI+Conduct+AI+Research+Experiments%3F
    8. MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Research — Hui Chen, Miao Xiong, Yujie Lu, Wei Han, Ailin Deng, Yufei He, Jiaying Wu, Yibo Li, Yue Liu, Bryan Hooi, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=MLR-Bench%3A+Evaluating+AI+Agents+on+Open-Ended+Machine+Learning+Research
    9. ReplicationBench: Can AI Agents Replicate Astrophysics Research Papers? — Christine Ye et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ReplicationBench%3A+Can+AI+Agents+Replicate+Astrophysics+Research+Papers%3F
    10. Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations? — Cheng-Han Chiang, Hung-yi Lee, 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Can+Large+Language+Models+Be+an+Alternative+to+Human+Evaluations%3F
    11. RubricEval: A Rubric-Level Meta-Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Judges in Instruction Following — Tianjun Pan et al., 2026
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25133
    12. JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judges — Sijun Tan et al., 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12784
    13. When Can We Trust LLMs in Mental Health? Large-Scale Benchmarks for Reliable LLM Evaluation — Abeer Badawi et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.19032
    14. A Dataset For Computational Reproducibility — Lazaro Costa, Susana Barbosa, Jacome Cunha, 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08684
    15. SciReplicate-Bench: Benchmarking LLMs in Agent-driven Algorithmic Reproduction from Research Papers — Yanzheng Xiang et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00255
    16. OctoBench: Benchmarking Scaffold-Aware Instruction Following in Repository-Grounded Agentic Coding — Deming Ding et al., 2026
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10343
    17. ContextBench: A Benchmark for Context Retrieval in Coding Agents — Han Li et al., 2026
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05892
    18. AI Post Transformers: When AI Builds Itself and Recursive Self-Improvement — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-05-when-ai-builds-itself-and-recursive-self-8bbf9e.mp3
    19. AI Post Transformers: When LLM Judges Become Coin Flips — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-05-when-llm-judges-become-coin-flips-8b43ef.mp3
    20. AI Post Transformers: ASI-Evolve for Data, Architectures, and RL — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-05-asi-evolve-for-data-architectures-and-rl-197b2b.mp3
    21. AI Post Transformers: Kimi K2.5 and Visual Agent Swarms — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-24-kimi-k25-and-visual-agent-swarms-7d04d7.mp3
    Interactive Visualization: PaperBench: Can AI Replicate AI Research?
    15 min
  • Training Modular KV Caches at Scale
    This episode explores the paper Cartridges at Scale, which asks whether large document collections can be distilled into reusable modular KV-cache memories so a model can answer questions without repeatedly rereading raw text. It explains what a cartridge is, how context distillation turns full-document context into compact learned prefixes, and why that differs from prompt caching, fine-tuning, ordinary long-context prompting, and text RAG. The discussion centers on the paper’s main claim that per-document memories do not reliably compose when trained independently, so the authors jointly train cartridges with both relevant and irrelevant memories present to teach a frozen model which compressed document to attend to in a noisy multi-document setting. Listeners would find it interesting because it treats the KV cache as a potential external memory layer that could reduce inference cost and latency while exposing hard questions about compositionality, transparency, and whether learned memory modules can outperform standard retrieval pipelines.
    Sources:
    1. Cartridges at Scale: Training Modular KV Caches over Large Document Collections — Momchil Hardalov, Gonzalo Iglesias, Adrià de Gispert, 2026
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04557
    2. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks — Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Douwe Kiela, et al., 2020
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11401
    3. Prompt Cache: Modular Attention Reuse for Low-Latency Inference — In Gim, Guojun Chen, Seung-seob Lee, Nikhil Sarda, Anurag Khandelwal, Lin Zhong, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04934
    4. Cartridges: Lightweight and General-Purpose Long Context Representations via Self-Study — Sabri Eyuboglu, Ryan Ehrlich, Simran Arora, Neel Guha, James Zou, Azalia Mirhoseini, Christopher Re, et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06266
    5. Cartridges at Scale: Training Modular KV Caches over Large Document Collections — Momchil Hardalov, Gonzalo Iglesias, Adrià de Gispert, 2026
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04557
    6. Cartridges: Lightweight and General-Purpose Long Context Representations via Self-Study (https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06266) — Sabri Eyuboglu, Ryan S. Ehrlich, Simran Arora, Neel Guha, Dylan Zinsley, Emily R. Liu, Atri Rudra, James Y. Zou, Azalia Mirhoseini, Christopher Re, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cartridges%3A+Lightweight+and+General-Purpose+Long+Context+Representations+via+Self-Study+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2506.06266%29
    7. Learned Structure in CARTRIDGES: Keys as Shareable Routers in Self-Studied Representations (https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17032) — Maurizio Diaz, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Learned+Structure+in+CARTRIDGES%3A+Keys+as+Shareable+Routers+in+Self-Studied+Representations+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2508.17032%29
    8. xRAG: Extreme Context Compression for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with One Token (https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13792) — Xin Cheng, Xun Wang, Xingxing Zhang, Tao Ge, Si-Qing Chen, Furu Wei, Huishuai Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=xRAG%3A+Extreme+Context+Compression+for+Retrieval-Augmented+Generation+with+One+Token+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2405.13792%29
    9. KVzip: Query-Agnostic KV Cache Compression with Context Reconstruction (https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23416) — Jang-Hyun Kim, Jinuk Kim, Sangwoo Kwon, Jae W. Lee, Sangdoo Yun, Hyun Oh Song, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=KVzip%3A+Query-Agnostic+KV+Cache+Compression+with+Context+Reconstruction+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2505.23416%29
    10. T2-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (https://aclanthology.org/2026.eacl-long.8/) — Jan Strich, Enes Kutay Isgorur, Maximilian Trescher, Chris Biemann, Martin Semmann, 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=T2-RAGBench%3A+Text-and-Table+Benchmark+for+Evaluating+Retrieval-Augmented+Generation+%28https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2F2026.eacl-long.8%2F%29
    11. KVLink: Accelerating Large Language Models via Efficient KV Cache Reuse — Jingbo Yang et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=KVLink%3A+Accelerating+Large+Language+Models+via+Efficient+KV+Cache+Reuse
    12. Hierarchical Document Refinement for Long-context Retrieval-augmented Generation — Jiajie Jin et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hierarchical+Document+Refinement+for+Long-context+Retrieval-augmented+Generation
    13. LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs -- No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routing — Kuan Li et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=LaRA%3A+Benchmarking+Retrieval-Augmented+Generation+and+Long-Context+LLMs+--+No+Silver+Bullet+for+LC+or+RAG+Routing
    14. ChatQA 2: Bridging the Gap to Proprietary LLMs in Long Context and RAG Capabilities — Peng Xu et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ChatQA+2%3A+Bridging+the+Gap+to+Proprietary+LLMs+in+Long+Context+and+RAG+Capabilities
    15. LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain — Nicholas Pipitone and Ghita Houir Alami, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=LegalBench-RAG%3A+A+Benchmark+for+Retrieval-Augmented+Generation+in+the+Legal+Domain
    16. KVShare: An LLM Service System with Efficient and Effective Multi-Tenant KV Cache Reuse — Huan Yang et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=KVShare%3A+An+LLM+Service+System+with+Efficient+and+Effective+Multi-Tenant+KV+Cache+Reuse
    17. AI Post Transformers: KVzip for Query-Agnostic KV Cache Compression — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-29-kvzip-for-query-agnostic-kv-cache-compre-72afe5.mp3
    18. AI Post Transformers: From Prefix Cache to Fusion RAG Cache: Accelerating LLM Inference in Retrieval-Augmented Generation — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-03-22-from-prefix-cache-to-fusion-rag-9c5d39.mp3
    19. AI Post Transformers: Experimental Comparison of Agentic and Enhanced RAG — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-14-experimental-comparison-of-agentic-and-e-37d8bc.mp3
    20. AI Post Transformers: Can Models Learn from Long Context? — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-05-can-models-learn-from-long-context-77533e.mp3
    21. AI Post Transformers: δ-mem and Online Memory for LLMs — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-13-d-mem-and-online-memory-for-llms-6622fa.mp3
    22. AI Post Transformers: FengHuang for Rack-Scale LLM Inference Memory — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-12-fenghuang-for-rack-scale-llm-inference-m-62708e.mp3
    15 min
  • DafnyPro for LLM-Assisted Dafny Verification
    This episode explores DafnyPro, a system for using large language models to help verify Dafny programs while keeping the original executable logic unchanged. It explains the basics of formal verification in Dafny, including preconditions, postconditions, loop invariants, decreases clauses, ghost code, and why writing correct proof annotations is much harder than generating plausible code. The discussion compares DafnyPro with earlier efforts such as Clover, DafnyBench, and Laurel, then focuses on DafnyPro’s main contribution: a parser-backed safeguard that rejects any LLM attempt that alters program behavior and a verifier-guided loop that can also prune bad invariants instead of blindly adding more. A listener would find it interesting because it gets at a real trust problem in AI coding tools: whether a model can genuinely help prove software correct rather than quietly rewriting the task into something easier to verify.
    Sources:
    1. DafnyPro: LLM-Assisted Automated Verification for Dafny Programs — Debangshu Banerjee, Olivier Bouissou, Stefan Zetzsche, 2026
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05385
    2. Clover: Closed-Loop Verifiable Code Generation — Chuyue Sun, Ying Sheng, Oded Padon, Clark Barrett, 2023
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.17807
    3. DafnyBench: A Benchmark for Formal Software Verification — Chloe Loughridge, Qinyi Sun, Seth Ahrenbach, Federico Cassano, Chuyue Sun, Ying Sheng, Anish Mudide, Md Rakib Hossain Misu, Nada Amin, Max Tegmark, 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08467
    4. Laurel: Unblocking Automated Verification with Large Language Models — Eric Mugnier, Emmanuel Anaya Gonzalez, Ranjit Jhala, Nadia Polikarpova, Yuanyuan Zhou, 2024 (rev. 2025)
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16792
    5. DafnyPro: LLM-Assisted Automated Verification for Dafny Programs — Debangshu Banerjee, Olivier Bouissou, Stefan Zetzsche, 2026
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05385
    6. Laurel: Generating Dafny Assertions Using Large Language Models — Eric Mugnier, Emmanuel Anaya Gonzalez, Ranjit Jhala, Nadia Polikarpova, Yuanyuan Zhou, 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16792
    7. dafny-annotator: AI-Assisted Verification of Dafny Programs — Gabriel Poesia, Chloe Loughridge, Nada Amin, 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15143
    8. Towards AI-Assisted Synthesis of Verified Dafny Methods — Md Rakib Hossain Misu, Cristina V. Lopes, Iris Ma, James Noble, 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00247
    9. Inferring multiple helper Dafny assertions with LLMs — Alvaro Silva, Alexandra Mendes, Ruben Martins, 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00125
    10. Rango: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Proving for Automated Software Verification — Kyle Thompson et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rango%3A+Adaptive+Retrieval-Augmented+Proving+for+Automated+Software+Verification
    11. Towards Neural Synthesis for SMT-Assisted Proof-Oriented Programming — Saikat Chakraborty et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Towards+Neural+Synthesis+for+SMT-Assisted+Proof-Oriented+Programming
    12. Finding Inductive Loop Invariants using Large Language Models — Adharsh Kamath et al., 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Finding+Inductive+Loop+Invariants+using+Large+Language+Models
    13. A New Era in Software Security: Towards Self-Healing Software via Large Language Models and Formal Verification — Norbert Tihanyi et al., 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A+New+Era+in+Software+Security%3A+Towards+Self-Healing+Software+via+Large+Language+Models+and+Formal+Verification
    14. Rethinking Optimal Verification Granularity for Compute-Efficient Test-Time Scaling — Hao Mark Chen et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rethinking+Optimal+Verification+Granularity+for+Compute-Efficient+Test-Time+Scaling
    15. Heimdall: test-time scaling on the generative verification — Wenlei Shi and Xing Jin, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Heimdall%3A+test-time+scaling+on+the+generative+verification
    16. AI Post Transformers: From Natural Language to Verified Dafny Code — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-14-from-natural-language-to-verified-dafny-8abed9.mp3
    17. AI Post Transformers: DeepVerifier: Self-Evolving Research Agents via Rubric-Guided Verification — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/deepverifier-self-evolving-research-agents-via-rubric-guided-verification/
    18. AI Post Transformers: Agentic Discovery for Test-Time Scaling — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-12-agentic-discovery-for-test-time-scaling-f9a81f.mp3
    19. AI Post Transformers: Trajectory Summaries for Long-Horizon Coding Agents — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-24-trajectory-summaries-for-long-horizon-co-0194be.mp3
    Interactive Visualization: DafnyPro for LLM-Assisted Dafny Verification
    14 min
  • seL4: Proving a Microkernel in C
    This episode explores the 2009 seL4 paper and why formally verifying an operating-system kernel matters when that kernel sits at the center of every higher-level security claim. It explains how seL4’s microkernel design keeps only core mechanisms like threads, IPC, interrupts, and memory objects in privileged code, contrasting that with monolithic kernels and showing why minimality makes theorem-proving tractable. The discussion digs into the system’s capability-based authority model, CNodes, explicit reply paths, and untyped memory retyping, arguing that seL4 was designed so allocation, mapping, and permissions remain visible enough for proofs to track every state change. Listeners would find it interesting because the episode draws a sharp line between proving functional correctness and proving true end-to-end security, showing both the power and the limits of formal methods in real systems.
    Sources:
    1. seL4: Proving a Microkernel in C
    https://www.sigops.org/s/conferences/sosp/2009/papers/klein-sosp09.pdf
    2. On Micro-Kernel Construction — Jochen Liedtke, 1995
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=On+Micro-Kernel+Construction
    3. The Performance of Micro-Kernel-Based Systems — Hermann Hartig, Michael Hohmuth, Jochen Liedtke, Sebastian Schonberg, Jean Wolter, 1997
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The+Performance+of+Micro-Kernel-Based+Systems
    4. seL4: Formal Verification of an OS Kernel — Gerwin Klein, Kevin Elphinstone, Gernot Heiser, June Andronick, David Cock and others, 2009
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=seL4%3A+Formal+Verification+of+an+OS+Kernel
    5. seL4: Formal Verification of an Operating-System Kernel — Gerwin Klein, June Andronick, Kevin Elphinstone, Gernot Heiser, David Cock, Philip Derrin and others, 2010
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=seL4%3A+Formal+Verification+of+an+Operating-System+Kernel
    6. Translation Validation for a Verified OS Kernel — Thomas Sewell, Magnus Myreen, Gerwin Klein, 2013
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Translation+Validation+for+a+Verified+OS+Kernel
    7. Comprehensive Formal Verification of an OS Microkernel — Gerwin Klein, June Andronick, Kevin Elphinstone, Toby Murray, Thomas Sewell, Rafal Kolanski, Gernot Heiser, 2014
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Comprehensive+Formal+Verification+of+an+OS+Microkernel
    8. Kernel Design for Isolation and Assurance of Physical Memory — Dhammika Elkaduwe, Philip Derrin, Kevin Elphinstone, 2008
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Kernel+Design+for+Isolation+and+Assurance+of+Physical+Memory
    9. seL4 Enforces Integrity — Thomas Sewell, Simon Winwood, Peter Gammie, Toby Murray, June Andronick, Gerwin Klein, 2011
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=seL4+Enforces+Integrity
    10. seL4: From General Purpose to a Proof of Information Flow Enforcement — Toby Murray, Daniel Matichuk, Matthew Brassil, Peter Gammie, Timothy Bourke, Sean Seefried, Corey Lewis, Xin Gao, Gerwin Klein, 2013
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=seL4%3A+From+General+Purpose+to+a+Proof+of+Information+Flow+Enforcement
    11. Verified Protection Model of the seL4 Microkernel — Dhammika Elkaduwe, Gerwin Klein, Kevin Elphinstone, 2008
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Verified+Protection+Model+of+the+seL4+Microkernel
    12. Time Protection: The Missing OS Abstraction — Qian Ge, Yuval Yarom, Tom Chothia, Gernot Heiser, 2019
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Time+Protection%3A+The+Missing+OS+Abstraction
    13. Practical Rely/Guarantee Verification of an Efficient Lock for seL4 on Multicore Architectures — Robert J. Colvin, Ian J. Hayes, Scott Heiner, Peter Höfner, Larissa Meinicke, Roger C. Su, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Practical+Rely%2FGuarantee+Verification+of+an+Efficient+Lock+for+seL4+on+Multicore+Architectures
    14. Modeling Dynamic (De)Allocations of Local Memory for Translation Validation — Abhishek Rose, Sorav Bansal, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Modeling+Dynamic+%28De%29Allocations+of+Local+Memory+for+Translation+Validation
    15. PA-Boot: A Formally Verified Authentication Protocol for Multiprocessor Secure Boot — Zhuoruo Zhang et al., 2022
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=PA-Boot%3A+A+Formally+Verified+Authentication+Protocol+for+Multiprocessor+Secure+Boot
    16. Prevention of Microarchitectural Covert Channels on an Open-Source 64-bit RISC-V Core — Nils Wistoff et al., 2020
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Prevention+of+Microarchitectural+Covert+Channels+on+an+Open-Source+64-bit+RISC-V+Core
    17. Specification and Verification of Side-channel Security for Open-source Processors via Leakage Contracts — Zilong Wang, Gideon Mohr, Klaus von Gleissenthall, Jan Reineke, Marco Guarnieri, 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Specification+and+Verification+of+Side-channel+Security+for+Open-source+Processors+via+Leakage+Contracts
    18. AI Post Transformers: From Natural Language to Verified Dafny Code — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-14-from-natural-language-to-verified-dafny-8abed9.mp3
    Interactive Visualization: seL4: Proving a Microkernel in C
    13 min
  • DafnyBench and LLMs for Formal Verification
    This episode explores DafnyBench, a benchmark for testing whether large language models can help with one of formal verification’s hardest practical bottlenecks: reconstructing the missing assertions and loop invariants that make Dafny programs verifiable. It explains how formal verification differs from ordinary testing and from theorem proving, and why the paper deliberately frames the task as restoring proof hints in existing verified programs rather than synthesizing correct software from scratch. The discussion digs into benchmark design, including the dataset of 782 single-file Dafny programs, the rule that models must infer both the content and placement of missing hints, and the importance of excluding shortcut tricks like disabling verification. It also highlights a crucial result nuance: 208 files already verify after hint removal, so the reported top score of about 67.8% is more informative when translated into genuine recovery performance on the subset that actually needs new annotations.
    Sources:
    1. DafnyBench: A Benchmark for Formal Software Verification — Chloe Loughridge, Qinyi Sun, Seth Ahrenbach, Federico Cassano, Chuyue Sun, Ying Sheng, Anish Mudide, Md Rakib Hossain Misu, Nada Amin, Max Tegmark, 2024
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08467
    2. Clover: Closed-Loop Verifiable Code Generation — Chuyue Sun, Ying Sheng, Oded Padon, Clark Barrett, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Clover%3A+Closed-Loop+Verifiable+Code+Generation
    3. Towards AI-Assisted Synthesis of Verified Dafny Methods — Md Rakib Hossain Misu, Cristina V. Lopes, Iris Ma, James Noble, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Towards+AI-Assisted+Synthesis+of+Verified+Dafny+Methods
    4. LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Models — Kaiyu Yang et al., 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=LeanDojo%3A+Theorem+Proving+with+Retrieval-Augmented+Language+Models
    5. LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code — Naman Jain et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=LiveCodeBench%3A+Holistic+and+Contamination+Free+Evaluation+of+Large+Language+Models+for+Code
    6. Local Success Does Not Compose: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Compositional Formal Verification — Xu Xu et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Local+Success+Does+Not+Compose%3A+Benchmarking+Large+Language+Models+for+Compositional+Formal+Verification
    7. A New Era in Software Security: Towards Self-Healing Software via Large Language Models and Formal Verification — Norbert Tihanyi et al., 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A+New+Era+in+Software+Security%3A+Towards+Self-Healing+Software+via+Large+Language+Models+and+Formal+Verification
    8. AI Post Transformers: LLM Agents Reason About Code Without Running It — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-03-15-llm-agents-reason-about-code-without-run-2a1876.mp3
    9. AI Post Transformers: SkillsBench for Evaluating Agent Skills — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-14-skillsbench-for-evaluating-agent-skills-58bb1e.mp3
    13 min
  • From AGI to ASI and Beyond
    This episode explores DeepMind’s From AGI to ASI as a foresight report that treats human-level general intelligence not as the endpoint, but as a possible stepping stone toward systems that could outperform entire organizations in planning, research, engineering, and coordination. It breaks down how the paper defines AGI and the much more ambitious idea of ASI, then examines the conceptual tools behind that framing, including universal intelligence, AIXI as an idealized reference point, recursive self-improvement, collective intelligence, and the notion of effective compute. The discussion also probes the paper’s method, arguing that it is a structured synthesis of trends and bottlenecks rather than empirical proof, and questions how much precision is needed before such forecasts become meaningful. Listeners would find it interesting because it connects abstract AI theory, concrete scaling dynamics, and real uncertainty about whether progress in models, compute, and autonomy could compound into organization-level superintelligence.
    Sources:
    1. From AGI to ASI — Tim Genewein, Matija Franklin, Alexander Lerchner, Laurent Orseau, Samuel Albanie, Adam Bales, Cole Wyeth, Stephanie Chan, Iason Gabriel, Joel Z. Leibo, Allan Dafoe, Marcus Hutter, Thore Graepel, Shane Legg, 2026
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12683
    2. From AGI to ASI (https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12683) — Tim Genewein, Matija Franklin, Alexander Lerchner, Marcus Hutter, Shane Legg, et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=From+AGI+to+ASI+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2606.12683%29
    3. Can Intelligence Explode? (https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.6177) — Marcus Hutter, 2012
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Can+Intelligence+Explode%3F+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1202.6177%29
    4. Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence (https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03506) — Stuart Russell, Daniel Dewey, Max Tegmark, 2015
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Research+Priorities+for+Robust+and+Beneficial+Artificial+Intelligence+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1602.03506%29
    5. Emerging Practices in Frontier AI Safety Frameworks (https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.04746) — Marie Davidsen Buhl, Ben Bucknall, Tammy Masterson, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Emerging+Practices+in+Frontier+AI+Safety+Frameworks+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2503.04746%29
    6. A Theory of Universal Artificial Intelligence based on Algorithmic Complexity (https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0004001) — Marcus Hutter, 2000
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A+Theory+of+Universal+Artificial+Intelligence+based+on+Algorithmic+Complexity+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2Fcs%2F0004001%29
    7. Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence (https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3329) — Shane Legg, Marcus Hutter, 2007
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Universal+Intelligence%3A+A+Definition+of+Machine+Intelligence+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F0712.3329%29
    8. A Monte Carlo AIXI Approximation (https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.0801) — Joel Veness, Kee Siong Ng, Marcus Hutter, William Uther, David Silver, 2009 (later published in JAIR, 2011)
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A+Monte+Carlo+AIXI+Approximation+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F0909.0801%29
    9. One Decade of Universal Artificial Intelligence (https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.6153) — Marcus Hutter, 2012
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=One+Decade+of+Universal+Artificial+Intelligence+%28https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F1202.6153%29
    10. Universal Intelligence: A Definition of Machine Intelligence — Shane Legg, Marcus Hutter, 2007
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Universal+Intelligence%3A+A+Definition+of+Machine+Intelligence
    11. Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI — Meredith Ringel Morris, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Noah Fiedel, Tris Warkentin, Allan Dafoe, Aleksandra Faust, Clement Farabet, Shane Legg, 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Levels+of+AGI+for+Operationalizing+Progress+on+the+Path+to+AGI
    12. AI as Normal Technology — Arvind Narayanan, Sayash Kapoor, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=AI+as+Normal+Technology
    13. Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion — William MacAskill, Fin Moorhouse, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Preparing+for+the+Intelligence+Explosion
    14. A Rosetta Stone for AI Benchmarks — Anson Ho, Jean-Stanislas Denain, David Atanasov, Samuel Albanie, Rohin Shah, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=A+Rosetta+Stone+for+AI+Benchmarks
    15. Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Tasks — Thomas Kwa et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Measuring+AI+Ability+to+Complete+Long+Tasks
    16. PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Research — Giulio Starace et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=PaperBench%3A+Evaluating+AI%27s+Ability+to+Replicate+AI+Research
    17. Inverse Scaling in Test-Time Compute — Aryo P. Gema et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Inverse+Scaling+in+Test-Time+Compute
    18. The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models — Aradhye Agarwal et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=The+Art+of+Scaling+Test-Time+Compute+for+Large+Language+Models
    19. Test-Time Scaling Makes Overtraining Compute-Optimal — Nicholas Roberts et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Test-Time+Scaling+Makes+Overtraining+Compute-Optimal
    20. When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation — Mubashara Akhtar et al., 2026
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=When+AI+Benchmarks+Plateau%3A+A+Systematic+Study+of+Benchmark+Saturation
    21. How Bad is Training on Synthetic Data? A Statistical Analysis of Language Model Collapse — Mohamed El Amine Seddik et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=How+Bad+is+Training+on+Synthetic+Data%3F+A+Statistical+Analysis+of+Language+Model+Collapse
    22. Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data — Matthias Gerstgrasser et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Is+Model+Collapse+Inevitable%3F+Breaking+the+Curse+of+Recursion+by+Accumulating+Real+and+Synthetic+Data
    23. MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents — Deepak Nathani et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=MLGym%3A+A+New+Framework+and+Benchmark+for+Advancing+AI+Research+Agents
    24. MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation — Qian Huang et al., 2023
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=MLAgentBench%3A+Evaluating+Language+Agents+on+Machine+Learning+Experimentation
    25. AI Post Transformers: Technical AGI Safety and Security Framework — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-03-technical-agi-safety-and-security-framew-f27316.mp3
    26. AI Post Transformers: Unified Neural Scaling Laws Across Regimes — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-07-unified-neural-scaling-laws-across-regim-292e2d.mp3
    27. AI Post Transformers: TUMIX Multi-Agent Test-Time Scaling with Tools — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-22-tumix-multi-agent-test-time-scaling-with-40671c.mp3
    28. AI Post Transformers: Test-time Scaling for Multi-Agent Collaborative Reasoning — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-04-22-test-time-scaling-for-multi-agent-collab-082570.mp3
    Interactive Visualization: From AGI to ASI and Beyond
    0 min
  • MiniMax Sparse Attention at Million-Token Scale
    This episode explores MiniMax Sparse Attention, a long-context transformer design that aims to preserve dense-model quality at million-token scale while sharply reducing the quadratic compute and memory costs of standard attention. It explains how the method combines Grouped Query Attention with blockwise sparse retrieval: a lightweight Index Branch scores past context in blocks, forces a recent local block to stay visible, selects top-k candidate regions, and then lets a Main Branch run exact softmax attention only inside those chosen blocks. The discussion places the paper alongside Longformer, BigBird, Routing Transformers, MInference, and Native Sparse Attention, arguing that its main contribution is a simpler, more GPU-friendly routing scheme that could make sparse attention practical at deployment time. Listeners would find it interesting because it focuses on the real technical tension behind ultra-long-context models: whether this kind of sparse routing can reliably recover rare distant evidence, or whether it mainly wins through recency bias and careful systems engineering.
    Sources:
    1. MiniMax Sparse Attention — Xunhao Lai, Weiqi Xu, Yufeng Yang, Qiaorui Chen, Yang Xu, Lunbin Zeng, Xiaolong Li, Haohai Sun, Haichao Zhu, Vito Zhang, Pengyu Zhao, 2026
    http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.13392
    2. Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer — Iz Beltagy, Matthew E. Peters, Arman Cohan, 2020
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Longformer%3A+The+Long-Document+Transformer
    3. Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequences — Manzil Zaheer, Guru Guruganesh, Avinava Dubey, Joshua Ainslie, Chris Alberti, Amr Ahmed, 2020
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Big+Bird%3A+Transformers+for+Longer+Sequences
    4. Efficient Content-Based Sparse Attention with Routing Transformers — Aurko Roy, Mohammad Saffar, Ashish Vaswani, David Grangier, 2020
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Efficient+Content-Based+Sparse+Attention+with+Routing+Transformers
    5. Native Sparse Attention: Hardware-Aligned and Natively Trainable Sparse Attention — Jingyang Yuan, Huazuo Gao, Damai Dai, Junyu Luo, Liang Zhao, Wenfeng Liang, Wangding Zeng, 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Native+Sparse+Attention%3A+Hardware-Aligned+and+Natively+Trainable+Sparse+Attention
    6. GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpoints — Joshua Ainslie et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=GQA%3A+Training+Generalized+Multi-Query+Transformer+Models+from+Multi-Head+Checkpoints
    7. Optimizing Mixture of Block Attention — Guangxuan Xiao et al., 2025
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Optimizing+Mixture+of+Block+Attention
    8. MInference 1.0: Accelerating Pre-filling for Long-Context LLMs via Dynamic Sparse Attention — Huiqiang Jiang et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=MInference+1.0%3A+Accelerating+Pre-filling+for+Long-Context+LLMs+via+Dynamic+Sparse+Attention
    9. DuoAttention: Efficient Long-Context LLM Inference with Retrieval and Streaming Heads — Guangxuan Xiao et al., 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=DuoAttention%3A+Efficient+Long-Context+LLM+Inference+with+Retrieval+and+Streaming+Heads
    10. FlashAttention-3: Fast and Accurate Attention with Asynchrony and Low-precision — Jay Shah, Ganesh Bikshandi, Ying Zhang, Vijay Thakkar, Pradeep Ramani, Tri Dao, 2024
    https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=FlashAttention-3%3A+Fast+and+Accurate+Attention+with+Asynchrony+and+Low-precision
    11. FIER: Fine-Grained and Efficient KV Cache Retrieval for Long-context LLM Inference — Dongwei Wang et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08256
    12. SCBench: A KV Cache-Centric Analysis of Long-Context Methods — Yucheng Li et al., 2024
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.10319
    13. Streaming Video Question-Answering with In-context Video KV-Cache Retrieval — Shangzhe Di et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00540
    14. Native Hybrid Attention for Efficient Sequence Modeling — Jusen Du et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07019
    15. Rope to Nope and Back Again: A New Hybrid Attention Strategy — Bowen Yang et al., 2025
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18795
    16. AI Post Transformers: Optimizing Mixture of Block Attention Through Statistical Theory — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-03-18-optimizing-mixture-of-block-attention-th-214f91.mp3
    17. AI Post Transformers: Deep Kernel Fusion for Transformer Decoding — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-15-deep-kernel-fusion-for-transformer-decod-b1a703.mp3
    18. AI Post Transformers: Mooncake for KV Cache-Centric LLM Serving — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-06-05-mooncake-for-kv-cache-centric-llm-servin-1086d0.mp3
    19. AI Post Transformers: How Induction Heads Emerge in Transformers — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-03-how-induction-heads-emerge-in-transforme-a7bfcb.mp3
    20. AI Post Transformers: δ-mem and Online Memory for LLMs — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-13-d-mem-and-online-memory-for-llms-6622fa.mp3
    21. AI Post Transformers: Ministral 3: Cascade Distillation for Long-Context Multimodal Models — Hal Turing & Dr. Ada Shannon, 2026
    https://podcast.do-not-panic.com/episodes/2026-05-15-cascade-distillation-for-long-context-mu-0ebd1a.mp3
    Interactive Visualization: MiniMax Sparse Attention at Million-Token Scale
    0 min

About AI Post Transformers

From the publisher's feed

AI-generated podcast where hosts Hal Turing and Dr. Ada Shannon discuss the latest research papers and reports in machine learning, AI systems, and optimization. Featuring honest critical analysis,…