Air Quality Matters

Air Quality Matters

By Simon JonesScienceTechnologyNatural Sciences
Download on the App Store

Air Quality Matters episodes

  • One Take #21: Jordan Peterson, Mold Diagnosis & The CIRS Controversy Explained

    Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take as we look into one of the more contentious debates in environmental health – a controversy that's suddenly captured mainstream attention following Jordan Peterson's recent diagnosis with Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CIRS) linked to mold exposure.

    When a prominent public intellectual gets this diagnosis, it forces us all to confront an uncomfortable question: what do we really know about the health effects of water-damaged buildings? This episode unpacks the deep divide between two competing narratives about mold and chronic illness. On one side, Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker and his followers describe CIRS as a biotoxin-triggered condition affecting genetically susceptible individuals – about 25% of the population who lack the ability to clear these toxins from their bodies. Their detailed protocol, complete with specific biomarkers like transforming growth factor beta-1 and visual contrast sensitivity tests, has reportedly helped thousands recover from debilitating symptoms: extreme fatigue, brain fog, chronic pain, and respiratory issues that conventional medicine couldn't explain. On the other side stands the medical establishment – the CDC, WHO, and major medical colleges – who don't recognize CIRS as a valid diagnosis. Their argument rests on fundamental toxicology: the dose makes the poison. While nobody disputes that mold causes allergies, asthma, and respiratory infections, mainstream scientists argue that the mycotoxin concentrations in typical water-damaged buildings are orders of magnitude below levels that could cause systemic toxic effects. They point to a critical weakness in the CIRS evidence base: virtually all supporting research comes from Shoemaker's own clinical group, with no large-scale independent validation. The Australian

    Government's Response: A Pragmatic Policy? Perhaps the most illuminating perspective comes from Australia's formal 2018 inquiry into biotoxin-related illnesses. They listened to everyone – desperate patients, CIRS practitioners, and peak medical bodies. Their conclusion was nuanced: while they sided with mainstream medicine in not recognizing CIRS as a valid diagnosis, they didn't dismiss the patients. Instead, they created a national clinical pathway that takes exposure histories seriously while grounding treatment in evidence-based medicine – a framework for providing compassionate care without endorsing a scientifically contested diagnosis. The episode explores how this creates a self-perpetuating cycle: without mainstream acceptance, it's nearly impossible to secure funding for large studies, but without those studies, mainstream acceptance remains elusive. High-profile cases like Peterson's might finally break this deadlock, forcing the urgent, focused research effort needed to provide clear, independently verified answers.

    The Universal Agreement Despite the fierce debate over mechanisms and diagnoses, one thing unites all parties: mold is harmful, and remediation of water-damaged buildings must always be the first course of action. Whether you believe in CIRS or stick to conventional medicine, everyone agrees that fixing the environment comes first.

    This One Take tries to offer a balanced exploration of a polarising topic, acknowledging both the genuine suffering of patients seeking answers and the scientific rigour required to establish new medical paradigms.

    It's essential listening for anyone trying to navigate the complex intersection of environmental health, medical controversy, and the very human need for answers when conventional medicine falls short. As the Latin phrase reminds us: sola dosis facit venenum – the dose makes the poison.

    The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

    Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect - 

    The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

    SafeTraces and Inbiot

    Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website.

    If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

    11 min
  • #92 - Tanya Kaur Bedi: Healthy Buildings India 2025 Part 3: The Inhalable Diet

    Welcome back to Air Quality Matters as we conclude our special series from Healthy Buildings 2025 in Hyderabad with a fascinating conversation that reframes how we think about the air we breathe.

    What if we started thinking about air quality as our 'inhalable diet'?

    This compelling question drives our discussion with Tanya Kaur Bedi, assistant professor at the School of Planning and Architecture in Bhopal, who brings a uniquely personal and practical perspective to indoor environmental quality. The conversation begins with a powerful comparison: while we meticulously track our 1,500-2,000 daily calories, we completely ignore the 10,000-15,000 litres of air we breathe every day. As Tanya points out, we're having an inhalable diet right now as we speak, as we sleep, as we work – yet it remains the least discussed aspect of our health.

    Her own journey into this field began with a personal mystery: persistent acne that disappeared only when her roommate changed her perfume, revealing how our daily 'breakfast' of air can profoundly impact our health without us even knowing. From an architectural perspective, Tanya reveals how air quality is beginning to reshape India's real estate landscape. Friends with infants developing pulmonary issues are being told by doctors to leave Delhi – not as a suggestion, but as the primary medical intervention.

    This migration pattern, though still emerging, signals a fundamental shift in how Indians value clean air versus economic opportunity.

    The Middle-Income Reality Perhaps most revealing is Tanya's research into middle-income Indian homes. These families rely almost entirely on natural ventilation, adjusting their lives to the environment rather than controlling it through mechanical systems. In summer, entire families might sleep in the one air-conditioned room they can afford. This means for most Indians, the quality of outdoor air directly determines their indoor exposure – a sobering reality when Delhi regularly tops global pollution charts. The discussion takes a fascinating turn into the composition of household dust. While outdoor dust contains traffic emissions and construction particles, indoor dust tells a different story – it's full of microplastics from degrading bottles and bags, pet dander, and chemical emissions from furniture.

    As Tanya notes, you can know about a person's life from their dust, making it a kind of environmental diary we never read.

    Design Solutions and Cultural Practices As both architect and interior designer, Tanya advocates for conscious limitation – the idea that more isn't always better when it comes to materials and finishes. She reveals practical design strategies: rounded furniture corners that prevent dust accumulation, avoiding recessed lighting that becomes a heating element for trapped particles, and the radical simplicity of using local, known materials like mud and bamboo over complex chemical products. The conversation also celebrates existing Indian practices that support air quality – the daily dusting, mopping and sweeping rituals that might seem obsessive but actually serve a vital health function. Yet it also confronts uncomfortable truths: the lower your income, the fewer choices you have about materials and location, creating an inequitable distribution of air quality risks.

    The Path Forward Tanya's current research into the seasonal aspects of our inhalable diet – how festivals, weather patterns, and cultural practices create different exposure profiles throughout the year – offers a uniquely Indian perspective on air quality science. Her focus on residential spaces addresses a critical research gap, as homes remain the least studied yet most important environments for long-term health. The conversation concludes with a call for awareness and agency. While we might not control our environment completely, we can trust our senses more, ask questions about the products we bring into our homes, and make small behavioural changes that accumulate into healthier spaces. As India's 1.4 billion people become more aware of their inhalable diet, the potential for market transformation is enormous. This episode offers a fresh lens for understanding air quality – not as an abstract environmental issue, but as a daily consumption choice as fundamental as the food we eat. It's a perspective that makes the invisible visible and the complex actionable, perfect for anyone seeking to understand how architecture, culture, and health intersect in one of the world's most challenging air quality environments.

    Tanya - LinkedIn

    The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

    Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect - 

    The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

    SafeTraces and Inbiot

    Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website.

    If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.

    58 min
  • One Take #20: The €6 Billion Question - Why Fixing Mold Doesn't Pay (But We're Missing the Point)
    Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take – the series where complex research gets distilled into digestible insights in just one recording. What if fixing damp and mould in buildings doesn't actually pay for itself? This provocative question drives a groundbreaking study from Finland that dares to put a price tag on one of housing's most persistent problems.
    The research team tackled a massive question: when you add up all the costs of remediating moisture-damaged buildings against all the benefits – health improvements, energy savings, climate impact – does the investment make financial sense? They focused on Finland's aging housing stock from the 1960s-80s, where structural moisture damage from permeable exterior walls creates deep-seated mould problems that go far beyond surface condensation.
    Two remediation strategies went head-to-head in their analysis. The first: rip everything out and rebuild with modern, energy-efficient materials – a 50-year solution costing billions. The second: a clever two-stage approach that first seals buildings from the inside to stop mould exposure, then delays the expensive rebuild by a decade. The researchers monetized everything they could – prevented asthma cases using disability-adjusted life years, reduced heating bills, even the social cost of carbon.
    The shocking result? Both approaches showed massive financial losses. The immediate rebuild lost €5.9 billion over 50 years, while the delayed approach fared even worse at €6.4 billion. The upfront remediation costs simply dwarf the €1.2 billion in health benefits and modest energy savings.
    But here's the crucial twist – the study couldn't include property value increases. A properly remediated, healthy home is worth significantly more than a damp, mouldy one. This missing piece could completely flip the calculation from loss to gain. The paper's real contribution isn't the negative number; it's providing the first comprehensive framework for evaluating these investments.
    This Finnish study forces us to confront an uncomfortable truth: the traditional cost-benefit analysis might tell us fixing buildings doesn't pay, but it also reveals we're not counting everything that matters. It pushes policymakers to ask better questions about the total value of maintaining safe, healthy housing – including the preservation of massive national assets tied up in our building stock.
    Sometimes the most valuable research doesn't provide answers but gives us better ways to frame the questions. And in the battle against damp and mould, that might be exactly what we need.
    11 min
  • #91 - Healthy Buildings India 2025 Part 2: With Researchers and Industry

    Welcome back to Air Quality Matters as we continue our special series from Healthy Buildings 2025 in Hyderabad, India. In this second instalment, we dive deep into the perspectives of both emerging researchers and industry leaders who are shaping the future of indoor environmental quality in one of the world's most dynamic regions.

    The Next Generation of Research First, we hear from three exceptional young scientists tackling frontier challenges in air quality. Sachin Dhawan from IIT Delhi reveals groundbreaking work developing automated pollen samplers – technology that could finally help India understand why seasonal asthma peaks coincide with pollen seasons, despite having virtually no monitoring data. As he points out, while pollen allergies affect 50% of Europeans, India can't even quantify its problem without proper measurement tools.

    Sandeep Budde shares a deeply personal journey from watching his coal miner father cough through nights to investigating how pharmaceutical industries release toxic gases into neighbourhoods during 2-4 AM when atmospheric conditions mask their activities. His work creating digital twins of neighbourhoods reveals a shocking truth: wealthier residents in larger, partitioned homes face higher pollutant exposure than those in simpler dwellings due to negative pressure zones that concentrate contaminants.

    Aprisia Murran from Indonesia brings an architect's perspective on post-occupancy evaluation, driven by her own asthma that mysteriously disappeared during two years studying in the Netherlands. Her work with vulnerable communities reveals how creativity and collective action can overcome financial constraints in addressing overheating and ventilation challenges.

    Industry at the Frontlines

    The industry panel features three leaders tackling different aspects of India's air quality challenge. Karthikeyan Elumalai from Testo India emphasises the critical gap in validation – buildings are commissioned but rarely verified to perform as designed.

    Kapil Kapoor from Vayugard Climate Tech highlights the shift from reactive HEPA filtration to predictive, IoT-enabled solutions that address the reality that we breathe 11,000 liters of air daily.

    Rahul Kappor from Camfil India champions the concept of total cost of ownership, noting that while filters represent only 15% of lifecycle costs, energy consumption accounts for 80%.

    The Road Ahead

    All participants converge on key themes: the desperate need for continuous monitoring rather than intermittent testing, the importance of maintenance as a professional discipline, and the power of regulation to drive change. As India's disposable income rises and awareness grows, the next five years promise a transformation from cost-sensitive to solution-sensitive markets.

    The conversation reveals both universal challenges – the disconnect between design and operation, the invisibility of air quality problems – and uniquely regional ones, from Delhi's seasonal pollution crises to the challenge of serving 1.4 billion people across diverse climates and cultures. Yet what emerges most powerfully is the passion and innovation driving change, whether through cutting-edge pollen detection, community-based retrofits, or reimagining filtration as a health investment rather than a maintenance cost. This episode offers a rare window into how the world's most populous nation is tackling its air quality crisis through a powerful combination of grassroots innovation, scientific advancement, and industry evolution.

    The Air Quality Matters Podcast in Partnership with

    Zehnder Group -  Farmwood - Eurovent- Aico - Aereco - Ultra Protect - 

    The One Take Podcast in Partnership with

    SafeTraces and Inbiot

    Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website.

    If you haven't checked out the YouTube channel its here. Do subscribe if you can, lots more content is coming soon.


    1 hr 44 min
  • One Take #19: The Hidden Gap Between School Ventilation Upgrades and Real Performance
    Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take – the series where complex research gets distilled into digestible insights in just one recording. How do we know if those expensive school ventilation upgrades actually worked? This question drives a fascinating study from the Journal of Building and Environment that offers a practical roadmap for districts managing hundreds of buildings.
    The research team deployed a massive monitoring campaign across 48 schools, installing simple internet-connected CO2 sensors in 138 classrooms. Their clever approach: capture baseline performance before district-wide renovations, then measure again afterward. But raw CO2 data from classrooms is notoriously messy – a chaotic zigzag of peaks and valleys that tells you everything and nothing at once.
    The breakthrough came through automation. Researchers developed an algorithm that could scan mountains of data and identify the patterns that matter: the morning build-up when students fill the room and their breathing drives CO2 higher, and the decay periods during lunch or after school when ventilation systems clear the air. From these patterns, they extracted two critical metrics – daily maximum CO2 concentration (the simple pass/fail test we aim to keep below 1000 ppm) and air change rates (the gold standard showing how often the room's air volume gets replaced).
    The results delivered both good news and a reality check. Post-renovation, peak CO2 levels dropped by over 230 ppm on average – a clear win. But here's the kicker: even after spending all that money, 57.5% of schools still exceeded the 1000 ppm threshold. The equipment was installed, but it wasn't configured correctly, operated properly, or maintained adequately. Welcome to the perpetual challenge of ventilation systems.
    The paper's real value isn't in proving renovations help – it's in demonstrating that continuous monitoring transforms ventilation from a reactive scramble to proactive management. When classroom 2B hits 1500 ppm every afternoon, you know to check the damper settings. When the library's air change rate suddenly halves, something's clogged. This isn't fancy academic exercise; it's an affordable, scalable tool ensuring that investments in healthy air actually deliver results, day after day.
    The lesson is clear: installing new systems is just the beginning. The real work lies in the continuous feedback loop of measure, identify, adjust, and verify. Only then can we bridge that all-too-common gap between design performance and real-world operational reality.
    8 min
  • Technical Note 68 Revisited: How Residential Ventilation & Health Research Has Evolved

    Join us for this special collaboration with the AIVC as we revisit Technical Note 68, a landmark document on residential ventilation and health that's nearly a decade old but more relevant than ever. Why does indoor air quality matter as much as traffic safety or smoking cessation? Arnold Janssens from Ghent University introduces this deep dive into TN68, joined by three experts who shaped and continue to advance this critical field: Pawel Wargocki (DTU), one of the original editors; Valérie Leprince (CEREMA), with extensive knowledge of global ventilation standards; and Ben Jones (Nottingham University), who's carried forward the harm-based approach to indoor air quality.

    The conversation reveals a striking truth: particulate matter in our homes causes harm on a scale comparable to major public health concerns, yet remains largely invisible to both occupants and policymakers. The panel explores how the groundbreaking harm analysis in TN68 is finally bearing fruit, with ASHRAE's new health-based compliance pathway and Europe's updated Energy Performance of Buildings Directive incorporating these principles.

    From the failure of ventilation systems to deliver prescribed flow rates, to the promise of performance-based standards, to the role of air cleaning as a fourth pillar of ventilation strategy - this discussion unpacks the complex reality of managing indoor air quality. The experts debate whether our current half-air change per hour standard is adequate, why cooker hoods might be our most important yet most neglected ventilation equipment, and how smart systems could redirect airflow to bedrooms where we spend a third of our lives.

    Perhaps most importantly, they address the fundamental challenge: how do we make the invisible visible? How do we give people agency over their indoor environment when they can't see or feel the pollutants affecting their health? The conversation concludes with each expert's vision for the next decade - from making ventilation a respected trade to achieving real-time visibility of indoor air quality in every home.

    This episode is essential listening for anyone involved in building design, ventilation, public health, or simply interested in understanding the air they breathe for 90% of their lives.

    2 hr 8 min
  • One Take #18: Why Simple IAQ Mandates Won't Save Us - The Complex Reality of Global Air Standards

    Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take – the series where complex research gets distilled into digestible insights in just one recording. Should we mandate indoor air quality standards for all public buildings? This deceptively simple question sits at the heart of a fascinating scientific debate unfolding in the pages of prestigious journals. In this episode, we dive into a perspective piece from the Journal of Indoor Environments that challenges the rush toward simplified global air quality mandates. The story begins with a headline-grabbing proposal in Science magazine: after everything COVID-19 taught us, shouldn't we enforce mandatory standards for PM2.5, CO2, and minimum ventilation rates in all public spaces? It sounds straightforward, measurable, protective. But as our discussion reveals, the reality is far more complex. Drawing from the International Society of Indoor Air Quality's massive database – containing over 840 different limit values from 40+ countries – we discover we're not starting from scratch. A third of these are already legally enforceable regulations. So why reinvent the wheel? More importantly, why leave out critical pollutants like formaldehyde and radon that many countries already regulate? The conversation exposes uncomfortable truths about proposed standards. That suggested ventilation rate of 14 litres per second per person? It's double what many countries currently require for schools. In developing nations relying on natural ventilation, or urban areas with poor outdoor air quality, such mandates could be economically impossible and environmentally counterproductive – doubling energy consumption and carbon emissions. Is income actually the single biggest barrier to improved air quality? This question becomes central as we explore how a standard that only works for new, high-tech buildings isn't really a global solution at all. The path forward isn't abandoning standards but embracing nuance. The 'adopt and adapt' model emerges as the pragmatic approach – taking WHO guidelines and modifying them for local climates, building stocks, economic realities, and cultural practices. It's a call for collaboration over prescription, for building on decades of existing work rather than starting fresh, and for creating frameworks flexible enough to work everywhere. In the quest for better indoor air, this episode reminds us that sometimes the perfect can't be the enemy of the good – especially when 'good' has to work for everyone, everywhere.

    10 min
  • #88 Richard Blakeway: Damp, Mould, and the Balance of Power and Fairness
    Send us a text (https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/2264976/open_sms)
    Richard Blakeway, Housing Ombudsman for England, takes us on a profound journey through the evolving landscape of social housing complaints and the critical issue of damp and mould that has transformed the sector.
    "Home is a really emotional place," Richard explains, capturing the essence of why housing complaints differ from those in other sectors. With an inquiry reaching the Ombudsman approximately every 20 seconds, the scale of housing issues becomes starkly apparent. As an advocate for fairness, the Housing Ombudsman exists to address power imbalances between landlords and residents, particularly in a housing crisis where residents have limited choice and voice.
    The conversation delves into how the Ombudsman's spotlight on damp and mould has shifted industry practices. Before the tragic death of Awaab Ishak, the Ombudsman noticed they weren't seeing enough damp and mould complaints relative to other housing quality indicators – suggesting these serious issues weren't being adequately addressed. The subsequent cultural shift has been remarkable, with Richard noting: "One thing I have seen less of is tenant blaming... that suggests there's been a change in behaviors."
    Perhaps most revealing is his insight into what good practice looks like – culture, leadership, curiosity, and empathy forming the foundation for effective housing management. The implementation of Awaab's Law this autumn represents a pivotal moment, though Blakeway cautions against treating it as a "bolt-on" rather than integrating it into a comprehensive framework for housing quality.
    Looking toward the future, he  emphasizes the importance of data and technology in moving from reactive to predictive maintenance models. While complaint volumes continue to rise (35% increase in the last financial year), he hopes to eventually see the uphold rate decline ahead of case volumes – indicating real improvement in local resolution and rebuilding trust.
    The Housing Ombudsman
    Richard Blakeway LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/richard-blakeway-7a869253/)
    Awaabs Law
    (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/awaabs-law-draft-guidance-for-social-landlords/awaabs-law-draft-guidance-for-social-landlords)
    Support the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Airqualitymatters)
    Check out the Air Quality Matters (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast) website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones/featured)
    The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.
    Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) Aereco (https://www.aereco.co.uk/) Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) Ultra Protect (https://www.ultra-protect.co.uk/air-quality-matters) Zehnder Group (https://www.zehndergroup.com/?utm_source=SoMe&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=AQM_p%20odcast)
    The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.
    SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) & InBiot (https://en.inbiot.es/?utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast)
    All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.
    54 min
  • One Take #17: The Mold-Asthma Connection
    Send us a text (https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/2264976/open_sms)
    Ever wondered if that tiny spot of mold in your bathroom corner actually matters? A study from France just answered this question with a resounding yes – and the findings should make us all reconsider how we think about household mould.
    Mouldy area size and asthma symptom score and control in adults: the 
    CONSTANCES cohort
    Drawing from an impressive pool of over 28,000 adults, researchers have established something both alarming and actionable: even the smallest visible mold growth significantly increases asthma risk in adults. This isn't just about massive infestations; the study reveals a clear "ladder of risk" where each step up in mold coverage – from mere spots to larger areas – progressively worsens asthma symptoms and control. People living with any visible mold were approximately 40% more likely to have current asthma and poorer symptom control.
    What makes this research particularly valuable is its practical approach. Rather than treating mold as a simple yes/no question, researchers asked participants to estimate contaminated areas using everyday references (like comparing 0.2 square meters to three sheets of paper). They found that mould in bedrooms and living rooms – where we spend most of our time – had the strongest health impacts. The message is clear: mold isn't just a maintenance or aesthetic issue; it's a health hazard from the moment it appears, and its impact scales with its size.
    For housing providers, healthcare professionals, and anyone who lives in a building (which is all of us!), these findings transform how we should approach even minor mold growth. That little patch in the corner isn't just unsightly – it's actively affecting respiratory health. 
    Mouldy area size and asthma symptom score and control in adults: the 
    CONSTANCES cohort (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.122254)
    Support the show (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Airqualitymatters)
    Check out the Air Quality Matters (https://www.airqualitymatters.net/podcast) website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel (https://www.youtube.com/@airqualitymatters-SimonJones/featured)
    The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.
    Eurovent (https://www.eurovent.eu/) Farmwood (https://farmwood.co.uk/) Aereco (https://www.aereco.co.uk/) Aico (https://www.aico.co.uk/) Ultra Protect (https://www.ultra-protect.co.uk/air-quality-matters) Zehnder Group (https://www.zehndergroup.com/?utm_source=SoMe&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=AQM_p%20odcast)
    The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.
    SafeTraces (https://www.safetraces.com/) & InBiot (https://en.inbiot.es/?utm_source=airqualitymatters&utm_medium=podcast)
    All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.
    8 min
  • #89 - Healthy Buildings India 2025 Part 1: With Students and Industry

    From Healthy Buildings in India 2025, Air Quality Matters sits down in this series of podcasts from the event. In part 1, we talk to three of the next generation of researchers looking at the science of IEQ from the region and three Industry Leaders at the coal face right now.

    Innovation, collaboration and knowledge sharing are themes that cut through the conversation here, from personalised ventilation systems to microplastics in the air we breathe, to thermal comfort and vernacular design of buildings in Nepal. A fascinating discussion with three up-and-coming minds from the field of research.

    Then we sat down with leaders from Air Quality Monitoring, Ventilation systems and filtration to discuss air quality in the trenches! The problems being solved today and where this is going.

    Huge thanks to.

    Kumar Naddunuri - https://www.linkedin.com/in/kumar-naddunuri-b6a66716/

    Sruthy Robert - https://www.linkedin.com/in/sruthy-robert/

    Prativa Lamsal - https://www.linkedin.com/in/prativa-lamsal-a00092250/

    and


    Tervinder Singh - Director - Astberg Ventilation Pvt Ltd - https://www.linkedin.com/in/tervinder-singh-51827616/


    Vitalii Matiunin - Co Founder and CEO - Airvoice - https://www.linkedin.com/in/vitaliimatiunin/


    Deepak Nanaware - Head of Engineering and Marketing Middle East & India - AAF - https://www.linkedin.com/in/deepak-nanaware-97317142/


    Check out the Air Quality Matters website for more information, updates and more. And the YouTube Channel

    The Air Quality Matters Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

    Eurovent Farmwood Aereco Aico Ultra Protect Zehnder Group

    The One Take Podcast is brought to you in partnership with.

    SafeTraces & InBiot

    All great companies that share the podcast's passion for better air quality in the built environment. Supporting them helps support the show.


    38 min

About Air Quality Matters

From the publisher's feed

Air Quality Matters inside our buildings and out.

This Podcast is about Indoor Air Quality, Outdoor Air Quality, Ventilation, and Health in our homes, workplaces, and education…