Abstract
Background:
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i),as key therapeutic agents for type 2 diabetes, have in recent years been recognized as potentially exerting europrotective effects on the central nervous system. However, systematic comparative evidence remains lacking regarding whether different Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) exhibit differential effects on dementia risk. By conducting a network meta-analysis to compare the association between different Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i)and the risk of dementia onset, the relative efficacy of each drug in reducing dementia risk is determined.
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the ochraneLibrary, from their inception to the search cutoff date of 1 December 2025. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing Sodium-glucosecotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) with other antidiabetic medications or placebo, and reporting dementia outcomes, were included. A network meta-analysis employing arandom-effects model was conducted. Pooled effect sizes were expressed as hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Relative efficacy among different drugs was ranked using the probability of ranking, whilst heterogeneity andconsistency were assessed.
Results:
Six cohort studies involving 845,433 patients were included in this analysis. The results of the network meta-analysis indicated that canagliflozin (HR = 0.75, 95% CrI: 0.59, 0.98),Dapagliflozin (HR = 0.75, 95% CrI: 0.59, 0.98), and Empagliflozin (HR = 0.69, 95% CrI: 0.55, 0.85) significantly reduced the risk of dementia onset. Empagliflozin had the highest probability of being ranked as the most effective treatment (81.2%). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between empagliflozin and dapagliflozin or canagliflozin in the network comparisons. For Alzheimer’s disease, Dapagliflozin (HR = 0.68,95% CrI: 0.48, 0.96) and Empagliflozin (HR = 0.62, 95% CrI: 0.45, 0.87) also demonstrated significant risk reduction, whilst direct comparisons between Empagliflozin and other agents showed no significant differences. For vasculardementia, Empagliflozin (HR = 0.63, 95% CrI: 0.46, 0.87) and Canagliflozin (HR = 0.71, 95% CrI: 0.48, 0.98) also demonstrated favorable outcomes.
Conclusions:
The findings of this study indicate that dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin, particularly empagliflozin, demonstrate significant potential in reducing the incidence ofdementia and related cognitive impairments. Compared with Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, these agents effectively lower the risk of dementia, Alzheimer’sdisease, and vascular dementia, offering an effective therapeutic option for diabetic patients, particularly the elderly.