Aliens Explored

On 23 August 1974, John Lennon claimed to witness a silent, illuminated UFO hovering over Manhattan. His partner May Pang said she saw it too.

The pair attempted to photograph the object, but when photographer Bob Gruen developed the film, the results were blank.

In this solo episode of Aliens Explored, Stu investigates the encounter through Lennon's own 1974 account, Pang's later recollections and Gruen's firsthand account of the photographic failure.

Lennon even documented the sighting on his album Walls and Bridges. But how much weight should we give eyewitness testimony when the supporting photographic evidence is missing?

We examine the reported object's appearance and behaviour, possible additional witnesses, the problems surrounding the film and the conventional explanations that might account for the encounter.

An intriguing historical UFO case that raises a bigger question about how we investigate extraordinary experiences.

The video edition, featuring historical photographs and archival documents, is available at:

Contact: [email protected]

Six years after his extraordinary claims about extraterrestrial contact and a Galactic Federation, former Israeli space-security chief Haim Eshed has resurfaced — and he is still standing by them.

Stu and Neil revisit the claims that made international headlines in 2020 and examine Eshed’s new account of unidentified men visiting his apartment and questioning him about scientific subjects.

But the central question is bigger than the latest claim: how much evidential weight should we give the extraordinary credentials of the person making it?

Eshed’s background makes him unusually difficult to dismiss out of hand. The lack of independently verifiable evidence creates a very different problem.

Stu and Neil do not entirely agree on where that leaves the story.

Contact: [email protected]

The Pentagon wants access to a vast privately held collection of historical UFO records. What could decades of civilian investigations add to the government’s own files?

In this solo September 2026 news roundup, Stu covers AARO’s proposed archive access, the sixth PURSUE release, new Galileo Project research into measuring UFO distance and movement, more than 1,000 pages of Navy UAP correspondence, the NSA’s response concerning Immaculate Constellation, whistleblower developments and several other significant stories from the month.

The central theme running through many of them is access to information — and the difference between simply having more UFO material and having evidence scientists can actually test.

Contact: [email protected]

The latest PURSUE release contains 72 UAP records — but they are not all equally revealing.

In this solo episode, Stu selects three documents and three recordings that deserve closer scrutiny, ranging from Edward J. Ruppelt’s 1952 Air Force presentation and an unusual AAWSAP paper on reported biological effects to recent military sensor cases and a lengthy Colorado law-enforcement sighting.

The central question running through the episode is simple: when a report contains striking estimates but the released evidence lacks complete range, altitude or sensor data, how much can we reasonably conclude?

Although the original video version contains the released footage and document extracts, the evidence and its limitations are explained throughout for audio listeners.

Contact: [email protected]

Did the modern UFO story really begin at Roswell?

Stu and Neil start their journey through the early history of the modern UFO phenomenon with the strange “Foo Fighter” reports of the Second World War, before moving into Kenneth Arnold’s famous 1947 sighting, the arrival of the term “flying saucer”, Roswell and the US Air Force investigations that became Project Sign, Project Grudge and Project Blue Book.

Along the way, they discuss how language and popular culture may have affected the way UFOs were reported, why the Roswell story changed dramatically over time, the recurring role of balloon explanations, and what we should — and shouldn’t — infer from Project Blue Book’s thousands of investigated cases.

The timeline continues next time with the remarkable events over Washington DC in 1952.

Contact: [email protected]

August brought more government UAP material — and some of David Grusch’s most specific claims yet.

Stu and Neil examine Grusch’s claim that he has seen photographs and video relating to an alleged crash-retrieval programme, alongside his new estimate of more than 25 but fewer than 100 supposedly recovered vehicles.

But August also brought an almost perfect counterpoint: researchers examining all 112 publicly released PURSUE sensor videos found that none contains the complete information needed to calculate an object’s physical speed reliably.

Also discussed are new UAP NDA-reporting guidance, PURSUE Release Five, Robert Bigelow’s claimed Oval Office briefing, European UAP monitoring, the latest Gallup polling, competing interpretations of PR043 and new Air Force material entering the National Archives.

More claims. More files. But how much can we actually test?

Contact: [email protected]

Two researchers have systematically analysed all 112 sensor videos released through the US government's PURSUE UAP programme — and their work raises a fundamental question about what those videos can actually establish.

In this solo Aliens Explored episode, Stu examines the new scientific preprint from Jacob Haqq-Misra and Ravi Kopparapu, including PR113, where the available information permits physical scenarios ranging from a small nearby object to something much larger travelling at extraordinary speed.

We also look at PR149, the importance of distance and camera geometry, and why the additional telemetry contained in the famous GOFAST footage makes such a difference to scientific analysis.

The original video version contains the sensor footage and diagrams discussed, but the central argument is equally important in audio: when we watch something moving rapidly across a screen, how much do we really know about how fast it was moving in the real world?

Contact: [email protected]

In 1969, Virgo Mitt was digging a well beneath his garden in Merivälja, Tallinn, when he reportedly encountered an extraordinarily hard metallic layer. The fragments he removed would become part of a mystery involving Soviet scientists, military interest and claims of something much larger beneath the property.

In this solo episode, Stu examines Object M and asks what the evidence really supports. A sample associated with the original discovery was analysed in 2017 and identified as likely human-made ferrochrome — but researchers could not be certain that it actually came from Mitt's original find.

So does that solve the mystery, or merely identify one particular piece of metal?

With renewed interest in Object M and the possibility of a modern ground-penetrating-radar survey, this remains a surprisingly testable UFO case.

Question of the Week: Is Object M effectively solved, or would you still want the garden properly scanned before closing the case?

Contact: [email protected]

The fifth tranche of PURSUE UAP records has arrived — but after 41 newly released items, are we actually any closer to understanding the phenomenon?

Stu Jackson and Neil Kelly examine Tranche 5 of the Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP Encounters, from its newly released videos and images to some much more intriguing historical government documents.

The footage itself leaves Neil distinctly underwhelmed: more distant lights, indistinct objects and sensor recordings that remain extremely difficult to interpret.

But buried among the documents are records showing that US military and intelligence agencies were taking the UFO problem seriously as far back as the 1940s.

We look at Project SIGN, technical analysis of UFO films from the early 1950s, recurring descriptions of unusual objects across generations, and a spectacular 1963 Brazilian crashed-object report which provides an excellent lesson in why the presence of a claim in a government file does not necessarily make that claim true.

Does Tranche 5 contain extraordinary evidence of extraterrestrial visitation?

No.

Does it strengthen the case that there is a genuine unresolved UAP phenomenon worthy of serious investigation?

That's where Stu and Neil don't entirely agree.

📩 [email protected]

#UAP #UFO #PURSUE #Tranche5 #UAPDisclosure #AliensExplored

July 2026 brought new government records, a delayed AARO report, scientific initiatives and potentially important movement on UAP disclosure legislation.

In this episode, Stu examines the month’s major developments, including AARO’s latest annual report, the extraordinary account of approximately 100 airborne UAP off the Virginia coast, the UAP Science Advisory Council chaired by Avi Loeb, the reported nondisclosure-agreement waiver and the House adoption of a new UAP disclosure framework.

We also briefly revisit the fourth PURSUE records release and consider continuing allegations involving private aerospace contractors.

July did not produce publicly verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial craft or reverse-engineering programmes. However, it may have expanded the processes through which government records, testimony and physical evidence could eventually be examined.

Did the month bring us closer to meaningful disclosure—or merely add another layer of bureaucracy to the subject?

Watch our full PURSUE Tranche Four analysis:

Watch our in-depth discussion of the UAP NDA waiver:

Contact Aliens Explored:

#UAP #UFO #UAPDisclosure #AARO #AliensExplored