
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This week’s data offered a familiar tension: reassuring headlines paired with more concerning underlying dynamics. The latest employment report appeared strong at first glance. Payrolls exceeded expectations and the unemployment rate declined. Yet the details tell a different story. Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco suggests that unusually warm weather materially distorted the data, implying that payrolls may in fact have fallen by roughly 79,000 rather than rising by 178,000. If accurate, that would mark the largest weather-related divergence in the series since 2015. The unemployment rate, too, deserves skepticism. Both employment and labor force participation declined. The drop in the unemployment rate was therefore less a sign of labor market strength than a reflection of arithmetic: the labor force shrank faster than unemployment itself. It is a softer dynamic than the headline suggests, and one that aligns with your broader theme of a labor market losing underlying momentum. The inflation side of the ledger was equally uncomfortable. The latest Personal Consumption Expenditures report from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed real disposable personal income slipping by 0.1 percent, even as both headline and core PCE rose by 0.4 percent month over month. In other words, purchasing power is being squeezed at the same time that inflation remains firm. That combination is rarely benign. Layered on top of this is the geopolitical backdrop. The conflict in Iran continues to inject uncertainty into energy markets and, by extension, inflation expectations. Oil’s volatility is not just a market story; it feeds directly into the policy dilemma facing the Federal Reserve, which must weigh persistent inflation pressures against signs of a softening economy. Taken together, the picture is not one of resilience but of fragility. Strong headlines are masking weaker foundations, while inflation remains uncomfortably elevated. It is precisely the kind of environment in which markets begin to question the narrative rather than accept it.
By Michael Roberts and Jeff BaldwinThis week’s data offered a familiar tension: reassuring headlines paired with more concerning underlying dynamics. The latest employment report appeared strong at first glance. Payrolls exceeded expectations and the unemployment rate declined. Yet the details tell a different story. Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco suggests that unusually warm weather materially distorted the data, implying that payrolls may in fact have fallen by roughly 79,000 rather than rising by 178,000. If accurate, that would mark the largest weather-related divergence in the series since 2015. The unemployment rate, too, deserves skepticism. Both employment and labor force participation declined. The drop in the unemployment rate was therefore less a sign of labor market strength than a reflection of arithmetic: the labor force shrank faster than unemployment itself. It is a softer dynamic than the headline suggests, and one that aligns with your broader theme of a labor market losing underlying momentum. The inflation side of the ledger was equally uncomfortable. The latest Personal Consumption Expenditures report from the Bureau of Economic Analysis showed real disposable personal income slipping by 0.1 percent, even as both headline and core PCE rose by 0.4 percent month over month. In other words, purchasing power is being squeezed at the same time that inflation remains firm. That combination is rarely benign. Layered on top of this is the geopolitical backdrop. The conflict in Iran continues to inject uncertainty into energy markets and, by extension, inflation expectations. Oil’s volatility is not just a market story; it feeds directly into the policy dilemma facing the Federal Reserve, which must weigh persistent inflation pressures against signs of a softening economy. Taken together, the picture is not one of resilience but of fragility. Strong headlines are masking weaker foundations, while inflation remains uncomfortably elevated. It is precisely the kind of environment in which markets begin to question the narrative rather than accept it.