What is going on here?! is this really a topic of converastion? Apparently, Yes and I address it here in this episode of AAC.

Is there a line in the sand as far as what actions can be used to defend based on the violence committed? If there is something like a line in the sand I describe it here. A line in the sand may be strong phrasing. Call it what you will. Let's get into the conversation!

I'm sure you've seen/heard some of the debates about borders during the past election year. Here is my take on what will happen with borders after the state is abolished or obsolete.

"Russia hacked the US Power Grid!... Up next we have some more fake news to report before we tell you which news outlets report fake news. Don't change the channel!"

"Click"

Trump trusts courier services for important info over email. The Holm's declined a birth certificate and SSN for their child and are now fighting to get her back! BitCoin breaks $1,000, but what strategy should anarchists use in attempting to make government money go obsolete?

I recently listened to Tom Woods host Bob Murphy and Walter Block on his PodCast. They debated the topic of accepting government money. I'm not sure any of them hit the nail on the head. Here's my response.

Here I discuss the concept that we need those who will engage the state head on and those that can support them by avoiding the state to keep their noses clean.

Is the Media pumping the Russian Hack nonsense to distract us from the corruption in the election that is coming out? Steve and I chat about a few other topics in the process and just have a generally good time!

Voting itself is an act that limits freedom. Might a vote loosen the chains a bit? Yes, but loose chains doesn't make one free.