
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Last week an article published in Al Jazeera by an academic at the University of Doha in Qatar proposed something that felt crazy to some western war watchers: America and Israel’s strategy in Iran is working.On this episode of Angry Planet, author Muhanad Seloom is here to explain his position. Seloom is an assistant professor of international politics…
America went to war in Iran, we’re told, because the idea of the country developing nuclear weapons was intolerable. Nukes are complicated and technical weapons that require scientists and experts to build, maintain, and manage. Highly enriched uranium (HEU) is core to the design and unless all of Iran’s HEU is accounted for the threat of it becoming a …
When the President said America had been at war with Iran for 47 years he mischaracterized fifty years of history. After World War II America envisioned Iran as a regional hegemon that would act in US interest. It didn’t play out that way.
This week on Angry Planet, journalist Aram Shabanian joins the program to talk about his first reactions to the Iran…
AI enthusiasts love to say that the technology is as revolutionary and important as nuclear weapons. Even the Trump administration has adopted the metaphor. The President and the Department of Energy have repeatedly referred to the development of AI in the US as “Manhattan Project 2.0.”
But is the buildout of LLMs and machine learning systems really as important as the development of the atom bomb? And what are the lessons from the atomic age that AI scientists should then learn? Do we need an AI Non Proliferation Treaty? An AI International Atomic Energy Agency?
On this episode of Angry Planet, Ankit Panda comes on to talk about the uses and limitations of the “AI as nuclear weapons” metaphor. Panda is an expert in nukes and a Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He’s been sharing his extended thoughts on the AI-nuclear connection at his Nukesletter Substack.
* Stanislav Petrov
* AI as nuclear weapons
* Why nuclear weapons resonate with people in the AI field
* The Strategic Air Command story
* That time we spilled nuclear material all over Greenland and Spain
* NNSA and Anthropic
* AI as the next Manhattan Project
* A massive infrastructure project
* Fissile material as silicon
* What’s the AI version of an NPT and IAEA?
* AI and nuclear are both dual use
* On AI winters
* What AI is actually being used for, what it might be used for
* The socialization around AI will change.
AI Arms and Influence: Frontier Models Exhibit Sophisticated Reasoning in Simulated Nuclear Crisis
Things have gotten very surreal in the dark corners of the internet. AI-generated prophets are preaching jihad in Facebook groups, Minecraft servers host digital caliphates, and school shooting fandoms gather to study their heroes and plot how to up beat their score. It’s a double bill on this episode of Angry Planet as two experts from the Institute fo…
America spent most of the 19th century at war with itself. It conquered its western expanse then collapsed into civil war. Once the North beat the South, partisan politics consumed the country for a generation. A string of assassinations, progressive firebrands, and civil service reforms burned people out on domestic politics and a bored and febrile nat…
Greenland fever has faded for now but it will return. The world’s polar region, you see, is pretty damn important. As the planet heats and the ice melts, what was once an impassible warren of ice and snow has become a geopolitical opportunity.
On today’s Angry Planet, we host journalist Kenneth R. Rosen who just published the book Polar War. He’s spent t…
There was a time, just before the pandemic, when folks would say “Twitter isn’t real life” as a means of dismissing the horrors of social media. This was a cope, a way to ignore the worst political and cultural actors who now dominate our psychic landscape. Now those people are in charge and they’ve manifested Twitter into real life in a way previously …
On January 28, 2025, I sat down with Aram Shabanian to talk about how we thought the first year of the Trump administration would go. I put the audio in a vault and didn’t listen to it until now.
We focused on geopolitics and the American military and our hit rate for predictions was about fifty percent. Domestically, it’s been much worse than I expected…
On the last Angry Planet of 2025, novelist and Marine Corps veteran Phil Klay returns to reflect on a year of spectacle and cruelty.
Between the Pentagon’s boat strikes and the administration’s constant barrage of grotesque memes, it feels like America is a crueler and cruder place. For better and worse, the Presidency sets a moral standard for the country and Trump has lowered that standard. Klay wrote about all this in a piece at The New York Times and he’s here with us today to talk through it.
* “It’s too easy to condemn.”
* The project is spectacles of cruelty
* “You’re not supposed to be joining a gang of thugs.”
* What is this doing to us as a nation?
* The lust for cruelty and domination
* Klay’s review of Hegseth’s first year
* War vs. Defense
* “Read long things.”
* Living in the Hell of opinions
* Ending on a high note
What Trump Is Really Doing With His Boat Strikes
Trump Admin’s Racist Halo Memes Are ‘A New Level of Dehumanization of Immigrants’
Trump has accused boat crews of being narco-terrorists. The truth, AP found, is more nuanced
From the publisher's feed