
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


TL;DR
Motivation
When I announced April's Better Futures Highlight Week,[1] I confidently wrote: “To make the future go better, we can either work to avoid near-term catastrophes like human extinction or improve the futures where we survive.”
But what if I was wrong? What if both options are bankrupt, and we have no justified answer as to whether any particular work would make the future better? In his Challenge of Unawareness sequence, Anthony DiGiovanni argues that we are in just this position.
Specifically, he argues that our evidence about the future is so poor that our assessments of impact (explicit expected-value estimates [...]
---
Outline:
(00:12) TL;DR
(00:54) Motivation
(02:12) How the competition works
(02:55) What your entry should look like
(03:49) Option 1: Challenge a premise
(05:19) Option 2: Challenge the inference
(05:33) Option 3: Offer a constructive response
(05:54) Prizes
(05:58) Essay competition
(07:43) Comment competition
(08:09) How will the essays and comments be judged?
(08:40) What comes after the competition?
(09:00) Judges
(09:13) Essay competition
(09:33) Comment competition
(09:50) Disclaimer
(10:44) FAQs
(10:48) Can I use AI?
(11:21) Can I co-author a piece?
(11:31) Can I submit a piece I've already published elsewhere?
(12:03) Will I get feedback on my entry?
(12:31) Does style matter?
---
First published:
Source:
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.
By EA Forum Team4.9
99 ratings
TL;DR
Motivation
When I announced April's Better Futures Highlight Week,[1] I confidently wrote: “To make the future go better, we can either work to avoid near-term catastrophes like human extinction or improve the futures where we survive.”
But what if I was wrong? What if both options are bankrupt, and we have no justified answer as to whether any particular work would make the future better? In his Challenge of Unawareness sequence, Anthony DiGiovanni argues that we are in just this position.
Specifically, he argues that our evidence about the future is so poor that our assessments of impact (explicit expected-value estimates [...]
---
Outline:
(00:12) TL;DR
(00:54) Motivation
(02:12) How the competition works
(02:55) What your entry should look like
(03:49) Option 1: Challenge a premise
(05:19) Option 2: Challenge the inference
(05:33) Option 3: Offer a constructive response
(05:54) Prizes
(05:58) Essay competition
(07:43) Comment competition
(08:09) How will the essays and comments be judged?
(08:40) What comes after the competition?
(09:00) Judges
(09:13) Essay competition
(09:33) Comment competition
(09:50) Disclaimer
(10:44) FAQs
(10:48) Can I use AI?
(11:21) Can I co-author a piece?
(11:31) Can I submit a piece I've already published elsewhere?
(12:03) Will I get feedback on my entry?
(12:31) Does style matter?
---
First published:
Source:
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

138 Listeners