Anthony Chipoletti

Stone Spirit by Anthony Chipoletti Parts of me have turned to stone, and my only joy is being alone. Other parts dissolve from me into the next reality. Only my spirit truely lives, where other spirits always give wholesomeness to who I am.

Text of the story. Shortly after I wrote the story, I found an online link to ZDNET, publisher of PC MAGAZINE and other amazing tech stuff. Downloading was a kind of new idea that the publisher wanted to showcase on a free CD which they often used as a free gift for new subscribers. Several short stories, including mine, were sent to subscribers all over the world. My first fan soon contacted me to ask when I would write another story. He lived in Estonia! It was several years before I wrote anything new on the web.Android, Age One is a science fiction adventure based on a real event.The author created the character, Android, from a child born with agenetic anomaly called leukodystrophy. The trait occurs in the nuclearfamily of the writer.The fictional setting for the story reflects recent studies tracinghuman female mitochondrial cell structures. The studies indicatedall humans living now are descended from as few as two females wholived on earth more than 200,000 years ago.See the complete story free. Listen to audio of the story. Free MP3 download.

https://waveform-particle-state.blogspot.com/ This site is written by myself, Anthony Chipoletti. My pen name is Graviton Ring from my book title. External links may have quoted titles or short descriptions from their linked pages. ALL of the information which I have written here is ONLY my opinion. I cannot justify any of my beliefs, so if my ideas here offend or confuse anyone, it is probably because I am still confused about anything and everything :) My pen name is Graviton Ring from my book title.I have added many new references to the blog posts here, and I update this site when possible.The goal of this site is to express my belief that I am an intangible observer of everything physical, including myself. As an observer, I never become the observed. I create my physical existence by observing it.My own opinion about our freedom to choose is that we have the ability to define ourselves as an observer. Everyone has the freedom to define their own awareness from their own point of view. There might be billions of different ways to observe reality. Just as there are a billion different stars. There are also billions of ways to define what we observe. There are obviously billions of objects which can be observed.The question for science to answer now seems to be exactly how are any physical objects created. Or perhaps, whether what is observed is actually physical or simply perceived to be physical. Identifying awareness as solely a physical object might limit our freedom to choose.My opinions are often based on ideas such as the ones at this site: The Philosophy of Objectivism One of the ideas there that I particularly like is that it is undeniable that we exist, have an identity, and are aware of reality. Also that these three axioms are indeed undeniable, however, they are not self-evident. Rather that nothing is self-evident because everything must be tested by reality.I added many Reference web links in the transcript of the interview with Sue Grandys and added my comments to clarify what I was thinking at the time.Most of what is here is simply my own opinion, which can change from time to time. I think it is wise to believe in one's own experiences, and whatever science can prove. Please forgive me if any of my opinions seem to be unreasonable. Everyone should be free to express their opinions, and have the right to change them when they choose. Enjoy! - Anthony Chipoletti

My real life experience showing me my brain needed weeks to construct the present moment. Inside the brain the so-called future may actually be the past. The brain needs a long time to construct the present moment. The event below happened to me in the mid 1990s which was about 50 years after I had a near death experience at age seven.The event appeared in my drawing about 30 days before the actual event, as if my drawing was a black and white [mirror image] photograph of the actual event which happened a month after I drew it ?? I was working through PMH Atwater's book FUTURE MEMORY. You can find the book with a web search. James van Avery has an experiment which PMH Atwater thoroughly outlines in the book.

Research has shown that as many as half of the people hearing a joke will be offended. The possible reason for this might be that many people cannot suspend reality. They may be offended because they do not see the conditions in the joke as imaginary, rather they think of the conditions in the joke as real.

There have been several after death events in my life. The first one I can recall was about age 7 in 1945 a few years after my uncle was killed in the US Army as described in another blog post. The other events happened much more closely to the actual date of the death of a friend or family member and were just brief encounters such as a smell or an unexpected encounter with a bird. The first event that clearly changed my life is described below. The editor described below is Charles T. Tart, Ph.D. This article first appeared on his website, T.A.S.T.E., The Archives of Scientists' Transcendent Experiences.Anthony Chipoletti (real name) graduated from the University of Pittsburgh in 1980 with a BS degree that included training in Chemistry, Biology and Psychology. He was employed for a time in Pittsburgh in 1968 as a medical research technician in hematology and hemophilia research with Jessica Lewis, who discovered Factor VIII. Financial and family needs kept him from further graduate education and he was employed as a researcher in the media industry. This Beyond the Light article was first published on T.A.S.T.E., The Archives of Scientists' Transcendent Experiences. http://www.issc-taste.org/arc/dbo.cgi?set=expom&id=00042&ss=1 The website of the third person, Nancy Clark https://www.freewebs.com/nancy-clark/

I wanted to mention some sources of many of my ideas about freedom of thought. Alan Watts died about 40 years ago. However, his work in audio, video and text is available on the internet at Alan Watts dot com. A free podcast is also available there.My ability to think freely was influenced by Alan Watts for at least 30 years. His lectures were broadcast on WDUQ, a national public radio station in Pittsburgh at Duquesne University. I never met Alan Watts, yet I believe that he has contributed more ideas to my personal beliefs and behavior than any other person. His ability to explain how humans think and act seems to me to be the most enlightened freedom of thought that I have ever seen.In particular, recently I listened to his podcast about fundamentalist Christian bigotry, that distorts the ideas of Christianity to justify xenophobia. Generally disrespecting any other beliefs in any religion or culture other than the distorted bigotry of fundamentalist obsessions? In my opinion, these obsessions that humans have with racial or cultural bigotry are caused by various disorders, including biological diseases and chemical abuses which affect the brainAnother person who has influenced my ideas is Michel Martin. She is a wonderfully talented interviewer and journalist at Amanpour and Company One of her excellent articles, called Witness to Doubt, has the subtitle What if the enemy of faith is not doubt but certainty? Witness-to-Doubt https://www.beliefnet.com/wellness/2003/01/witness-to-doubt.aspx

Can the human mind define itself? From what point of view do we define our lives? How are we aware that we are tangible? What is the source of our awareness of anything?Fifty psychological and psychiatric terms to avoid: a list of inaccurate, misleading, misused, ambiguous, and logically confused words and phrases: This site says the term scientific 'method' is misleading !!'...conceptualize science as.. finely honed tools designed to minimize mistakes, especially.. the ubiquitous propensity to seek out and selectively interpret evidence consistent with our hypotheses and to deny, dismiss, and distort evidence that does not.. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4522609/I hope I can carry the same respect for scientific method tools, that my professors and the great scientists did.

Near the end of the 1900s, scientists found the tau neutrino. It is the last of the fundamental building blocks of matter. It took six million tries to find the four events that proved the tau neutrino exists. The magic number of building blocks of matter appears to be six. That is, there are sixquarks, and six leptons. The tau neutrino, which is a lepton, was the last of the dozen.The tau lepton, which is what the tau neutrino becomes, after hitting an atomic nucleus, such as iron, quickly disappears. The only evidence the tau lepton leaves is a one millimeter track.

A summary of my podcasts and my ideas about the nature of time.