
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Bible speaks of the existence of enormous humans in the past–individuals over nine feet tall. Does the fossil record support that contention?
While naturalistic scientists claim that the fossil record is proof of evolution, upon studying the evidence, one finds that the three sweeping traits of the fossil record provide powerful evidence that validates biblical Creation/the Flood and falsifies Darwinian evolution.
Even if the Bible was originally authored by God, how do we know it has been copied faithfully through the centuries? Has the Bible been corrupted through its transmission?
Can a person know that the Bible really was authored by God, rather than mere men? The Bible has divine characteristics (like its unity, brevity, and scientific foreknowledge) which are beyond the ability of humans to have produced.
Even if we can know that A god exists, how do we know that that god is specifically the God of the Bible?
If a poem demands the existence of a poet, then design demands the existence of a designer. The Universe contains billions of examples of design, proving that the Universe had a Designer. One example: the eye.
There are several logical arguments that demand that God must exist (e.g., the Cosmological, Aesthetic, Intuitional, Moral, and Teleological Arguments). Although those arguments have been made for centuries, they have never been disproven by atheists and still stand as testaments against atheism.
The mere existence of the laws of science logically demands the existence of God. Specific laws, like the Law of Cause and Effect and the Law of Biogenesis, provide further evidence for God, and even naturalists must tacitly admit it.
Many claim that biblical faith is a blind, evidence-less belief. The Bible, however, does not support that view. On the contrary, the Bible claims that God has left immense amounts of evidence that will force a person to believe in Him if he will simply study the evidence without bias.
While we see numerous different continents on Earth’s surface today, there seems to be some evidence for these continents being joined together into one large landmass, sometimes called Pangaea. Does the Bible say anything about Pangaea? Would this idea be contradictory to the Bible or fit within the history described?
From the publisher's feed