This episodes addresses yet another aspect of how human control can be sufficiently maintained. Article 36 puts forth its arguments of why it is crucial for the user of a system to understand the system in use, as well as outlining what an assessment of sufficient understanding could look like.

This episode answers following questions:

- Will weapons with autonomous function do what we intend for them to do?

- And to what degree should the user understand the system that is being used?

In this episode, we look at arguments for why we believe it is a problem to have machines targeting people.

This episodes explores how time and space should be considered as means for maintaining meaningful human control. The key questions that this episode answers are:

1) What systems are considered unacceptable that would need to be prohibited?

2) How is meaningful human control ensured over the systems that do not need to be prohibited?

Target profiles are the way that autonomous weapons identify targets. They are the patterns of information from a system’s sensors that are supposed to match an intended target - or target type. This episode is talking about how these systems work, exploring the problems that arise when the complexity of the world, including people, is reduced into a pre-programmed pattern of data.

Applying force based on sensors is the connection between algorithmic decision and execution of kinetic force onto a target, which could be either a non-living target or a person. In this episode, we’ll be gaining insight into Article 36’s position on banning and regulating some weapons systems that apply force based on processing sensor inputs.