
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
ore and more often, when searching for information online or interacting with AI-powered chatbots, we get a familiar feeling: are we really getting the whole truth? Or is something important being quietly left out?
In this episode, we dive deep into one of the most crucial issues of the digital age — how large language models (LLMs) moderate, filter, and sometimes censor information, subtly shaping how we understand the world.
Based on the recent study "What Large Language Models Do Not Talk About: An Empirical Study of Moderation and Censorship", we explore:
What hard censorship is — from outright refusals to pre-written template responses.
What soft censorship is — subtle omissions of crucial facts and context.
How different AI models, including Western, Chinese, and Russian models, censor differently based on the language of the question and political sensitivity of the topic.
Why some models are more cautious discussing political figures from their own countries, and why others are not.
How the language of your query affects censorship rates — for example, Russian models refusing more often when asked in Russian, while Western models censored more often in Chinese.
What AIs omit in descriptions of major political figures — from skipping Stalin’s purges to ignoring Snowden’s whistleblowing.
How soft censorship shows up by omitting human rights violations and contributions to global development goals.
Why shorter answers might not just be brevity, but a way to avoid sensitive topics.
This episode unpacks the complexity of AI censorship: where is the line between deliberate silence, safety policies, and genuine gaps in knowledge? We discuss:
How AI developers may unintentionally or intentionally influence the information users receive.
Why it's crucial to think critically about any AI-generated answer, even when it sounds confident.
The risks of centralizing information in the hands of a few AI platforms.
What strategies might help preserve diversity of opinions and increase algorithmic transparency.
Who will benefit from this episode:
Anyone interested in AI development, media literacy, and freedom of information.
Researchers in AI ethics, media, and communications.
Developers, policymakers, and regulators concerned with censorship and information fairness in the digital era.
In this episode, you'll find practical advice on:
Recognizing potential biases in AI responses.
Comparing different AI tools to see how they treat sensitive topics.
Evaluating sources critically, even when they seem "neutral."
Using AI consciously without falling into hidden censorship traps.
This conversation offers not just facts but serious food for thought about the future of our informational environment — and what role we, as users, must play in protecting its fairness and diversity.
🎧 Listen now to discover:
How hidden censorship shapes your understanding of the world.
Why different countries train their AI models differently.
How to spot soft censorship in AI outputs.
What's next: heavy regulation or a free marketplace of AI perspectives?
Read more: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.03803
ore and more often, when searching for information online or interacting with AI-powered chatbots, we get a familiar feeling: are we really getting the whole truth? Or is something important being quietly left out?
In this episode, we dive deep into one of the most crucial issues of the digital age — how large language models (LLMs) moderate, filter, and sometimes censor information, subtly shaping how we understand the world.
Based on the recent study "What Large Language Models Do Not Talk About: An Empirical Study of Moderation and Censorship", we explore:
What hard censorship is — from outright refusals to pre-written template responses.
What soft censorship is — subtle omissions of crucial facts and context.
How different AI models, including Western, Chinese, and Russian models, censor differently based on the language of the question and political sensitivity of the topic.
Why some models are more cautious discussing political figures from their own countries, and why others are not.
How the language of your query affects censorship rates — for example, Russian models refusing more often when asked in Russian, while Western models censored more often in Chinese.
What AIs omit in descriptions of major political figures — from skipping Stalin’s purges to ignoring Snowden’s whistleblowing.
How soft censorship shows up by omitting human rights violations and contributions to global development goals.
Why shorter answers might not just be brevity, but a way to avoid sensitive topics.
This episode unpacks the complexity of AI censorship: where is the line between deliberate silence, safety policies, and genuine gaps in knowledge? We discuss:
How AI developers may unintentionally or intentionally influence the information users receive.
Why it's crucial to think critically about any AI-generated answer, even when it sounds confident.
The risks of centralizing information in the hands of a few AI platforms.
What strategies might help preserve diversity of opinions and increase algorithmic transparency.
Who will benefit from this episode:
Anyone interested in AI development, media literacy, and freedom of information.
Researchers in AI ethics, media, and communications.
Developers, policymakers, and regulators concerned with censorship and information fairness in the digital era.
In this episode, you'll find practical advice on:
Recognizing potential biases in AI responses.
Comparing different AI tools to see how they treat sensitive topics.
Evaluating sources critically, even when they seem "neutral."
Using AI consciously without falling into hidden censorship traps.
This conversation offers not just facts but serious food for thought about the future of our informational environment — and what role we, as users, must play in protecting its fairness and diversity.
🎧 Listen now to discover:
How hidden censorship shapes your understanding of the world.
Why different countries train their AI models differently.
How to spot soft censorship in AI outputs.
What's next: heavy regulation or a free marketplace of AI perspectives?
Read more: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.03803