i am not an expert   but   i  think something is wrong   the internet wasnt even that big in 1998

i really think they did a bad thing switching ownership of the internet from the u.s. military to icaan. i just read someone named jon postel was in charge of the internet before it as very big. then jon postel died in 1998 which is the same year they gave the internet from the u.s. government to a "multi stake holder" icaan. which was formed in 1998. in 2016 the process of switching the internet form us control to the "multi stake holder" was completed

i think a lot of the scientists int he military when arpanet was happening though were descendants of the wwII folks  arpanet lasted from 1969 to 1990   the scientists were different then

the u.s. military didnt create the internet, the internet says, but they were in a project called arpanet that was a precursor to the internet

it does seem bad to use a "multi stake holder" to run the internet.  the u.s. military seemed more trustworthy back then 

https://www.reddit.com/r/decadeology/comments/19bxjkj/internet_culture_has_felt_stagnant_since_about/

since so much is done through the internet, sundar cant represent everyone 

since google controls so much it could be a good idea to switch out the ceo's every once in a while . does google control more than the military does?  it seems like every time everyone who does anything on line gets put in to one big room and the person at the top is sundar   if everyone gets put in to one big room i think they will start fighting to the death

i am pretty angry about this 

obviously if anyone marries in to your family the english royal family it is special