but look it is not my fault that migrants took over germany you know.  i think it is a problem as well. 

i am not even really native american that i know of. 

it would be interesting to be living out side of the u.s. right now and watch what donald trump is going to do 

the truth is i think the current supreme court would be ok with stripping citizenship from anyone who doesnt look european or african.   

not even the native americans will be safe. i think they would use that as a way to completely get rid of them. 

i did say way back that it does seem like it could be a good idea to give people land  kind of like they did for the native americans.  but even in mexico the native american people didnt get private land.  but i think in mexico it was very different than the u.s. because there werent that many european settlers like in the u.s. 

i dont think there was massacre in mexico like there was in the u.s. and probably canada 

they are trying to say it will only apply to people born to non citizen parents. but why bring up a point that you think it was only for descendents of slaves?   you could have just said it is for legal residents only or something. 

in 1865 they are saying that african americans were repeatedly denied birthright citizenship.  i am not sure if half european half latin american or half european half asian people or half european half native american were also denied citizenship.  they are just saying that african americans were repeatedly denied citizenship. 

there are a lot of half european half latin americans. kind of like anywhere else europeans migrated.  but for all the half european half latin americans that lived in this area in 1865, were they considered americans? 

obviously the law is saying that african americans were repeatedly denied citizenship even in 1865.  were the half european half latin american  or half european and half asian  people also denied citizenship?  i know there were not that many people of asian descent in the u.s. in 1865