DEMNUni: comparing nonlinear power spectra prescriptions in the presence of massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy by G. Parimbelli et al. on Monday 21 November
We provide an accurate comparison, against large cosmological $N$-body
simulations, of different prescriptions for modelling nonlinear matter power
spectra in the presence of massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy. We test
the current most widely used approaches: fitting functions (HALOFIT and
HMcode), the halo-model reaction (ReACT) and emulators (baccoemu and
EuclidEmulator2). Focussing on redshifts $z\leq2$ and scales $k\lesssim 1 \
h/$Mpc (where the simulation mass resolution provides $\sim 1\%$ accuracy), we
find that HMcode and ReACT considerably improve over the HALOFIT prescriptions
of Smith and Takahashi (both combined with the Bird correction), with an
overall agreement of 2\% for all the cosmological scenarios considered.
Concerning emulators, we find that, especially at low redshifts,
EuclidEmulator2 remarkably agrees with the simulated spectra at $\lesssim 1\%$
level in scenarios with dynamical dark energy and massless neutrinos, reaching
a maximum difference of $\sim 2\%$ at $z=2$. baccoemu has a similar behaviour
as EuclidEmulator2, except for a couple of dark energy models. In cosmologies
with massive neutrinos, at $z=0$ all the nonlinear prescriptions improve their
agreement with respect to the massless neutrino case, except for the Bird and
TakaBird models which, however, are not tailored to $w_0$--$w_a$ models. At
$z>0$ we do not find a similar improvement when including massive neutrinos,
probably due to the lower impact of neutrino free-streaming at higher
redshifts; rather at $z=2$ EuclidEmulator2 exceeds $2\%$ agreement for some
dark energy equation of state. When considering ratios between the matter power
spectrum computed in a given cosmological model and its $\Lambda$CDM
counterpart, all the tested prescriptions agree with simulated data, at
sub-percent or percent level, depending on $z$. [ABRIDGED]
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.13677v2