A study of oxygen-rich post-AGB stars in the Milky Way to understand the production of silicates from evolved stars by F. Dell'Agli et al. on Thursday 24 November
The study of post asymptotic giant branch (post-AGB) stars is a valuable tool
to study still poorly known aspects of the evolution of the stars through the
AGB. This is due to the accurate determination of their surface chemical
composition and to the peculiar shape of the SED: the emission from the central
star can be easily disentangled from the contribution from the dusty shell,
which can then be characterized. The goal of the present study is to
reconstruct the dust formation process and more generally the late phases of
the evolution of O-rich stars across the AGB phase. This is performed by
studying O-rich, post-AGB stars, which are analyzed in terms of their
luminosity, Teff and infrared excess. We study sources classified as single,
O-rich, post-AGB stars in the Galaxy, which exhibit a double-peaked
(shell-type) SED. We use results from stellar evolution modelling combined with
dust formation and radiative transfer modelling to reconstruct the late AGB
phases and the initial contraction to the post-AGB phase. We also determine the
mass-loss and dust formation rates for stars of different mass and chemical
composition. The analysis of the IR excess of the post-AGB, O-rich stars
examined in this study outlines an interesting complexity, in terms of the
correlation between the dust in the surroundings of the stars, the evolutionary
status and the progenitor's mass. The sources descending from massive AGBs
(>3Msun depending on metallicity) are generally characterized by higher IR
excess than the lower mass counterparts, owing to the more intense dust
formation taking place during the final AGB phases. From the determination of
the location of the dusty regions we deduce that the expanding velocities of
the outflow change significantly from star to star. The possibility that
radiation pressure is unable to accelerate the wind in the faintest objects is
also commented.
arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13029v1