
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of Badlands Book Club, CannCon and Ashe in America are joined by Colonel Towner Watkins as they continue working through Stolen Elections, covering the next section of the book and unpacking its claims in real time. The discussion revisits allegations surrounding Venezuela, cartel activity, Chinese money laundering, and narco-trafficking, with the hosts challenging the sourcing, math, and logic presented in the text.
As the chapter shifts toward Smartmatic, Sequoia, Dominion, and international election contracts, the panel scrutinizes assertions about corporate ownership, offshore registrations, CFIUS investigations, and the role of figures like Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. They compare the book’s claims to publicly available records, question the reliance on unnamed whistleblowers, and dissect the interview excerpts used as evidence.
Throughout the episode, the hosts emphasize the difference between documented proof and layered hearsay, pushing back on what they argue is narrative framing rather than substantiated fact. The result is a detailed, point-by-point analysis of the book’s claims and the broader story it attempts to tell about elections and foreign influence.
By Badlands Media4.7
120120 ratings
In this episode of Badlands Book Club, CannCon and Ashe in America are joined by Colonel Towner Watkins as they continue working through Stolen Elections, covering the next section of the book and unpacking its claims in real time. The discussion revisits allegations surrounding Venezuela, cartel activity, Chinese money laundering, and narco-trafficking, with the hosts challenging the sourcing, math, and logic presented in the text.
As the chapter shifts toward Smartmatic, Sequoia, Dominion, and international election contracts, the panel scrutinizes assertions about corporate ownership, offshore registrations, CFIUS investigations, and the role of figures like Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. They compare the book’s claims to publicly available records, question the reliance on unnamed whistleblowers, and dissect the interview excerpts used as evidence.
Throughout the episode, the hosts emphasize the difference between documented proof and layered hearsay, pushing back on what they argue is narrative framing rather than substantiated fact. The result is a detailed, point-by-point analysis of the book’s claims and the broader story it attempts to tell about elections and foreign influence.

64,089 Listeners

16,643 Listeners

1,343 Listeners

685 Listeners

5,945 Listeners

2,227 Listeners

240 Listeners

1,832 Listeners

546 Listeners

516 Listeners

1,255 Listeners

383 Listeners

16,419 Listeners

1,189 Listeners

288 Listeners