We welcome people from the Czech Republic to our proud pool of podcast patrons.
We do trivia and a listener offers a question inspired by our last podcast.
John outlines the process by which cases come to the Supreme Court.
We examine the Colorado law banning “conversion therapy” in the case of Chiles v. Colorado.
Tim discusses the law considering concept creep, its vagueness, and where guidelines come from. John shares thoughts on free speech and consent.
Tim has two whack-jobs who are united by a common desire to slip something past discovery.
John’s hero saved millions of lives by donating blood.
Referred to:
Prohibit Conversion Therapy for A Minor | Colorado General Assembly
Supreme Court takes up challenge to Colorado ban on “conversion therapy”
U.S. Study on Puberty Blockers Goes Unpublished Because of Politics, Doctor Says - The New York Times
Final Report – Cass Review
The WPATH Files — Environmental Progress
Wisconsin governor's push to remove gendered language sparks controversy | Fox News
James Harrison, Australian blood donor who helped babies, dies at 88 - The Washington Post
Maybe you have a whack-job, a hero, trivia, or a topic? Your ideas come first—send them [email protected].
Don’t forget to share, subscribe, rate, and review.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ideasfirst.substack.com