Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share #BattleFest2016: What’s the truth about ’post-truth’ politics?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
#BattleFest2016: What’s the truth about ’post-truth’ politics?
Listen to the debate from the Battle of Ideas 2016.
In November, Oxford Dictionaries declared ‘post-truth’ its Word of the Year. For some commentators, both the US presidential campaign and the EU referendum in the UK have revealed the emergence of ‘post-truth’ politics. Donald Trump has dismissed fact-checking as an ‘out-of-touch, elitist media-type thing’. Former Tory minister and Brexit leader Michael Gove notoriously claimed that ‘people in this country have had enough of experts’.
Have experts been over-reaching themselves and intruding into matters that require political judgement rather than statistics? On the other hand, if people scorn evidence, will society sink into the mire of prejudice and superstition? Have the majority of voters really given up on assessing the evidence?
SPEAKERS
Professor Frank Furedi
sociologist and social commentator; author, What’s Happened to the University?, Power of Reading: from Socrates to Twitter, and Authority: a sociological history
Josh Lowe
European politics reporter, Newsweek
Neena Modi
professor of neonatal medicine, Imperial College London; consultant in neonatal medicine, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust; president, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Dr Adam Rutherford
geneticist, science writer and broadcaster, BBC; author, Creation and A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived.
View all episodes
By academyofideas
3.9
77 ratings
Listen to the debate from the Battle of Ideas 2016.
In November, Oxford Dictionaries declared ‘post-truth’ its Word of the Year. For some commentators, both the US presidential campaign and the EU referendum in the UK have revealed the emergence of ‘post-truth’ politics. Donald Trump has dismissed fact-checking as an ‘out-of-touch, elitist media-type thing’. Former Tory minister and Brexit leader Michael Gove notoriously claimed that ‘people in this country have had enough of experts’.
Have experts been over-reaching themselves and intruding into matters that require political judgement rather than statistics? On the other hand, if people scorn evidence, will society sink into the mire of prejudice and superstition? Have the majority of voters really given up on assessing the evidence?
SPEAKERS
Professor Frank Furedi
sociologist and social commentator; author, What’s Happened to the University?, Power of Reading: from Socrates to Twitter, and Authority: a sociological history
Josh Lowe
European politics reporter, Newsweek
Neena Modi
professor of neonatal medicine, Imperial College London; consultant in neonatal medicine, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust; president, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health
Dr Adam Rutherford
geneticist, science writer and broadcaster, BBC; author, Creation and A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived.
More shows like Academy of Ideas
View all
Making Sense with Sam Harris
26,369 Listeners
The spiked podcast
211 Listeners
Americano
266 Listeners
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
33,907 Listeners
Academy of Ideas
563 Listeners
TRIGGERnometry
1,972 Listeners
The Brendan O'Neill Show
370 Listeners
Last Orders - a spiked podcast
54 Listeners
Quillette Podcast
792 Listeners
Planet Normal
183 Listeners
heretics.
596 Listeners
The Rest Is History
13,541 Listeners
The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
545 Listeners
The Current Thing
29 Listeners
Beyond Gender
40 Listeners