What really happened during Noah’s flood? If you read Genesis 6-9 carefully, it’s clearly NOT a kids’ story filled with cute cartoon animals on a floating playground.

In Genesis 6, we’re told the human heart had become so bent, so violent, that God was grieved to His core. The flood isn’t just about water, arks, and animals. It’s about God’s judgment, mercy, and the unsettling truth about what the human race is capable of.

But buried in the story are questions we rarely slow down to ask:

Was Noah extraordinary—or just faithful in a corrupt world?

Why does the Bible say God “regretted” creating humanity? Could the ark actually hold all those animals? Why did the flood last a full year, not just 40 days?

What does the olive branch really prove?

Has anyone actually found the ark on Mount Ararat?

And why does Jesus Christ point back to Noah when talking about the end?

Even more, what does this story say about us as human beings?

On today’s episode, we’ll dig into the difficult questions: the justice of God, the depth of human brokenness, and the surprising thread of grace running through it all.

What if the "ancient world" wasn't a primitive era of cavemen, but a sophisticated, global civilization that rivaled—or maybe even exceeded—our own?

In today’s episode, we dive into the 1,656-year gap between Adam and the Great Flood—a span of time equal to the distance between the Fall of Rome and the invention of the internet. We’re asking the heavy questions the text leaves behind:

Such as the mystery of the Nephilim. Who were the "Sons of God," and how did their union with human women create a race of legendary "men of renown"?

The Gift of Time: How would society change if you lived for 900 years? Would you become a master of dozens of trades, or would a few "ancients" simply hoard all the world’s wealth and power?

The Greenhouse Earth: Imagine a world with no seasons, no polar ice caps, and no rain—where a single supercontinent allowed you to walk to any corner of the globe.

The Dark Side of Progress: How did a world with a single language and advanced industry descend into a state of "total war" and absolute spiritual depravity?

The Bible says that as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Are we seeing the shadows of that pre-Flood world in our headlines today?

Join us as we explore the "world that was" and the warning it holds for the world that is.

The pro-life movement changed dramatically after the fall of Roe v. Wade. But new debates are emerging inside the movement itself. In this week’s episode, we sit down with pro-life speaker and writer Andrew Wood to talk about the current state of the pro-life cause, the rise of the abortion abolitionist movement, and why he believes wisdom—not just urgency—must guide how Christians seek to end abortion. We discuss strategy, moral clarity, and what faithful engagement looks like in this cultural moment.

Last night, February 24, 2026, U.S. President Donald J. Trump, addressed the nation. This morning, we’re breaking it down — the substance, the spin, and what it could mean for the year ahead.

This is our State of the Union reaction.

Christianity in America is on the decline. Or is it? Even as fewer American adults claim to practice the Christian faith, Bible sales are up by 41% in the last 3 years, and downloads of spiritual apps are up by 79%.

So is Christianity in America growing? Or shrinking?

One thing’s for sure— the landscape of the church in America certainly is changing.

So on today’s episode, we’re talking about the church—where it’s clearly changing, where the data is surprising, and where it’s honestly a little unsettling. Some of these trends feel encouraging, some raise real questions, and none of them let us stay on autopilot.

So while we can’t predict the future or we don’t want to chase fads, it is helpful to pay attention, ask better questions, and think faithfully about what it means to lead and follow Jesus in this moment.

It’s not secret to anyone paying attention: America is more divided politically and ideologically than we’ve been in a very long time. And conversations about important cultural moments often quickly devolve into name-calling, shouting, and shaming those who don’t see things the way that we do. Regardless of what side you’re on of whatever issue is in the forefront of the news cycle, there’s talking points we repeat that we’ve been given from whatever news source we’ve consumed while we simultaneously shout down the “other side” as loudly as possible.

But none of this is working. Something is deeply broken. And for all our rage, it’s not getting fixed anytime soon.

But why? Why is it that we’ve found ourselves at such a deeply divided ideological impasse?

Perhaps the problem isn’t just about politics. Maybe it’s not really political at all.

Perhaps we are living in the same country, using the same words, but operating with two very different visions of reality itself. Two competing answers to deeper questions we rarely stop to name: 

Like, what is America, really? What is justice? What does it mean to be free? What is the purpose of law, and who gets to define it?

And for those who call themselves Christians, the divide cuts even deeper.

What is Christianity at its core? Is it a gospel that calls us to repentance, faith, and obedience to Jesus as Lord? Is it a message that calls us to submit to the commands of God and speaks of God’s judgment towards the wicked and unrepentant? Or, is it following a Jesus who was a social activist who lived primarily to extend compassion towards the weak, poor, and disenfranchised?

If we’re commanded to love our neighbor, what is the wisest and most faithful way to do that in a fractured culture? When love and truth appear to collide, which do we choose? Or is just a false dilemma altogether?

OK, real talk. Our intent with this episode is not to yell louder or score points with a certain side. We just want to ask better questions, and hopefully name the rival stories shaping our moment.

Because until we understand the visions competing for our allegiance, we’ll keep fighting the wrong battles and wondering why nothing ever changes.

And maybe…just maybe…if we’ll listen long enough and seek truth, maybe the fractures among us just might to start to slowly heal.

You asked, we listened. And now dear listener, here is an episode devoted entirely to your listener questions. On today’s episode, we field questions about self-defense, miraculous healing, why the younger generation is gravitating towards more liturgical traditions, and what Jesus meant by the phrase, “lead not into temptation” in the Lord’s prayer.

So sit back, grab your popcorn or bonbons, and let’s open up the mailbag together. 

Send us your questions for our "From the Mailbag" episode to [email protected]. 

Thanks for listening!

On today's episode, Gabe is joined by special guest Nick Sayers as they step into the ring to discuss the King James Version Only movement. 

Textual criticism is basically the process of comparing all the oldest and best ancient copies of the Bible we’ve discovered, so we can get as close as possible to the original words the biblical authors wrote.

Properly understood- it’s not scary, it’s not anti-faith, and it doesn’t deny the inspiration of Scripture — it’s simply good scholarship. And modern Bible translations use this approach to draw from a much larger, older, and more diverse set of manuscripts than translators had access to in the 1600s. The goal is clarity, accuracy, and faithfulness to the earliest text we can reconstruct.

But the KJV-Only movement takes a very different path. It leans solely on the Textus Receptus, a smaller collection of later manuscripts that the King James translators used. While those manuscripts are valuable, they represent only a sliver of the evidence we have today— which means the KJV-Only position often struggles to account for the full reality of how Bible translation actually works and how language naturally develops over time.

In the first part of a two-part series, we’re going to hear from Seth Knorr from BibleTheologyBlog.com as he explains and defends the textual-criticism approach to Bible translation—unpacking how it works, why it uses a broader and earlier set of manuscripts, and how it differs from the KJV-Only reliance on the Textus Receptus.