Beer and Conversation with Pigweed and Crowhill

Genuine racism is a bad thing. That's why the word "racist" used to carry real moral weight — because real racism is a serious wrong.

But the word has been misused, abused, overused, and trampled on.

After decades of overuse, misapplication, and outright abuse, the accusation of racism has jumped the shark.

Today, voter ID is racist. Advanced math is racist. Showing up on time is racist. Flying your country's flag is racist.

When everything is racist, nothing is.

Pigweed and Crowhill dig into how the left turned a legitimate moral concept into a political weapon — and how that weapon is now misfiring badly.

Plus: a review of honey Kölsch from Danville Ballad Brewing and a listener pushback on our Saul Alinsky episode.

📬 Send us your thoughts: [email protected]

🌐 More episodes: pigweedandcrowhill.com

👍 Like, subscribe, and tell a friend

P&C crack open a Dogfish Head apricot IPA and take on the 19th Amendment — the real history, not the mythology.

The standard story says women were yearning for the vote while men kept them down. The actual history is more nuanced.

* Who actually opposed women's suffrage (hint: many women),

* Why the anti-suffragettes predicted today's social problems with eerie accuracy, and

* What the growing political divide between men and women means for the future of democracy.

Plus: is universal suffrage actually the right system, or is "everybody votes" a more radical idea than we think?

📬 Send us your thoughts: [email protected]

🌐 More episodes: pigweedandcrowhill.com

👍 Like, subscribe, and tell a friend

Why does the aftermath of every revolution look like a disaster -- except ours?

Pigweed and Crowhill walk through the big ones.

* France's Reign of Terror killed tens of thousands and left the country in chaos for a century.

* Haiti's slave revolt produced 111 changes of head of state and has never stopped bleeding.

* Russia's communist revolution promised a people's paradise and delivered gulags and engineered famines.

* China's Cultural Revolution had students beating their teachers to death and killed sparrows until the plague came.

* Cuba took one of the wealthiest islands in the Caribbean and turned it into a museum.

The common threads: destroy religion, abolish private property, eliminate the old institutions, and above all — try to create a new kind of man from scratch.

It never works. It always ends in mass death and tyranny.

What did America do differently?

The founders weren't trying to remake human nature. They weren't starting from year zero. They were British citizens who already had self-government, local institutions, and a functioning legal tradition — and they simply wanted the king to stop interfering with it. Conservative in the truest sense of the word.

Beer: Czech Style Pale Lager — Montgomery County, MD | 2025 Great American Beer Festival Gold

#AmericanRevolution #History #FrenchRevolution #Communism #ColdWarHistory #CraftBeer #Politics

Has Pride Month reached its peak?

Pigweed and Crowhill discuss the origins of Pride Month, the Stonewall riots, the changing meaning of the word "pride," and why June feels different than it did just a few years ago. Along the way they explore corporate virtue signaling, rainbow branding, LGBTQ activism, transgender controversies, compelled speech in sports, and whether the movement has expanded so far that it is beginning to generate its own backlash.

The conversation also touches on biblical views of pride, the difference between accomplishment and identity, and why some activists, corporations, athletes, and even members of the LGBTQ community appear less enthusiastic than they once were.

Plus: a Southern Maryland IPA from Calvert Brewing Company.

#PrideMonth #Stonewall #CultureWar #LGBTQ #Politics #CurrentEvents #BeerAndConversation #PigweedAndCrowhill

Benjamin Franklin was a printer, publisher, inventor, scientist, diplomat, entrepreneur, author, and Founding Father. He helped secure American independence, invented practical technologies still used today, built civic institutions, and retired wealthy at age 42.

He may well have been the most impressive American -- maybe even the most impressive man -- who ever lived.

In this installment of our America 250 series, Pigweed and Crowhill explore the remarkable life of the man some have called "the first American."

Plus: a review of Monument City's American Brown Ale.

#America250 #BenjaminFranklin #FoundingFathers #AmericanHistory #USHistory

Is the insanity defense a get-out-of-jail-free card — or does "not knowing right from wrong" actually make you more dangerous? Pigweed and Crowhill dig into one of law's most misunderstood doctrines: what the insanity defense actually requires, why it succeeds in only about 25% of the cases where it's even attempted, and why the guys think the standard argument runs backwards. From the Son of Sam's killer dog (mostly a myth) to the McNaughton Rule, the Garfield assassination, James Holmes, and a Florida State student who believed he was half dog — the case studies are wild, but the underlying question is serious: when someone genuinely can't distinguish right from wrong, is that a reason for leniency, or a reason they should never be released?

Also: a blood orange blonde ale from Molly's down in Prince Frederick. It actually tastes like orange. High praise.

#InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #LegalHistory #Podcast #CriminalJustice

📬 Send us your thoughts: [email protected]

🌐 More episodes: pigweedandcrowhill.com

👍 Like, subscribe, and tell a friend

For the inaugural episode of Conspiracy Corner, Pigweed and Crowhill investigate the claim that birds are actually government surveillance drones. The theory is completely fake—and that's the point.

Created as a parody of conspiracy culture, Birds Aren't Real became a social experiment that exposed how easily movements can gain momentum and how quickly people can mistake satire for sincerity. Along the way, the hosts discuss fake whistleblowers, media reactions, group identity, persecution narratives, and the enduring appeal of hidden truths. Plus, they settle an important question: Have you ever seen a baby pigeon?

The boys drink and review Sierra Nevada's Torpedo Extra IPA, then move on to political strategy and methods.

Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals remains one of the most influential—and controversial—books on political organizing ever written. In this episode, Pigweed and Crowhill dive into the life and ideas of the Chicago community organizer whose methods have shaped activist movements for generations. From "pick the target" and "keep the pressure on" to the strategic use of ridicule, disruption, and media attention, they unpack Alinsky's famous tactics and examine why they continue to be effective decades after they were first developed.

But the conversation goes beyond a simple review of organizing techniques. Are these tactics merely practical tools that can be used by anyone seeking political change, or do they encourage a permanent culture of conflict? Why do modern movements always seem to be searching for the next crisis, the next injustice, or the next cause? Pigweed and Crowhill explore whether activism has become less about solving problems and more about sustaining a mindset of perpetual agitation.

Along the way, they discuss Barack Obama's background as a community organizer, Hillary Clinton's connection to Alinsky, Ben Shapiro's surprising praise for some of Alinsky's methods, and the broader question of how political narratives are created, amplified, and maintained. Whether you see Alinsky as a champion of the powerless, a master strategist, or something more troubling, his influence on modern politics is impossible to ignore.

📬 Send us your thoughts: [email protected]

🌐 More episodes: pigweedandcrowhill.com

👍 Like, subscribe, and tell a friend

Is the government secretly poisoning us through airplane exhaust? Pigweed and Crowhill drink a couple of stouts and dig into the chemtrails conspiracy — one of the most persistent theories in the skies today.

They break down the real historical cases that give the theory its legs: Operation Sea Spray, Operation Large Area Coverage, MKUltra, and other documented government experiments conducted without public consent.

Then they weigh the actual claims — population control, weather modification, compliance drugs, corporate cover-ups — against the far simpler scientific explanation for contrails.

Along the way, the conversation drifts into cloud seeding (which is real and uncontroversial), the ethics of weather manipulation, trolley-problem-style moral dilemmas, and whether a slow chemical buildup could gradually make us all more compliant voters.

Their verdict? Totally false. But the kind of totally false that makes you understand exactly why people believe it.

Conspiracy Corner examines the plausible, the ridiculous, and the occasionally true — one theory at a time.

#chemtrails, #conspiracytheories, #cloudseeding, #MKUltra, #OperationSeaSpray

Human moral judgment emerges from emotion, empathy, lived experience, social development, and our embodied understanding of the world. AI has none of those things. So, can artificial intelligence be taught right from wrong?

If we're going to rely on AI (the way the tech bros want us to), we're going to need to trust it, which means we're going to need to believe it has a trustworthy moral sense. Is that reasonable? Or even possible?

Pigweed and Crowhill recall Google's Gemini image-generation fiasco (where "give me an image of a pope" created anything but an image of a pope), which resulted from a ham-handed attempted to paste moral rules on top of AI. It was comically stupid, but entirely predictable.

Many people assume morality is simply a matter of following a set of rules, but no set of rules can create a proper moral sense.

The boys discuss hallucinated legal citations, content moderation, reinforcement learning, the limits of rule-based ethics, Isaac Asimov's famous Three Laws of Robotics, and Pope Leo's recent call for AI guardrails. The conversation also explores autonomous weapons, the global AI arms race, and the uncomfortable reality that even the engineers building these systems do not always understand how they arrive at their conclusions.

Their conclusion is both simple and unsettling: AI may become useful, powerful, and even trustworthy in certain contexts, but that is not the same thing as being moral. Machines may imitate moral reasoning, yet human beings must remain skeptical, vigilant, and ultimately responsible for the decisions AI helps make.

Can a machine have a conscience? Or are we fooling ourselves when we talk about "moral AI" at all?

📬 Send us your thoughts: [email protected]

🌐 More episodes: pigweedandcrowhill.com

👍 Like, subscribe, and tell a friend